APPROPRIATENESS OF MNEMONIC TECHNIQUES ON FREE RECALL LEARNING OUTCOMES IN PUBLIC UPPER PRIMARY SCHOOLS IN MACHAKOS SUB-COUNTY, KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2674Keywords:
free call, verbal learning, pegword, keyword, learning outcomes, mnemonic techniquesAbstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the appropriateness of mnemonic techniques on free recall learning outcomes in primary schools in Machakos Sub-County, Machakos County, Kenya. A 2x4 factorial design was used to test the appropriateness of three mnemonic techniques on free recall learning outcomes. Stratified sampling was to select one school from each of the three educational zones of Machakos Sub-County. Purposeful sampling was used to select four schools with mean grades between 279-281 marks in 2017 KCPE results. Random sampling was used to assign intact groups experimental and control groups. A sample size of 317 pupils was selected from standard seven pupils to participate in the study. The following research instruments were used: observation schedules for monitoring treatment process, Questionnaires for testing pupils’ satisfaction level and test scores for measuring free recall learning outcomes. The validity and reliability of the instruments was established by piloting the research instruments in Kathiani Sub-County. The reliability of the research instrument was determined through the split-half correlation method. The treatment process involved exposing pupils to learning using three mnemonic instruction conditions. Two-way ANOVA was used to analyse the data. Post-hoc pair wise comparison (LSD) was done to test which groups had significant difference. The results were analyzed descriptively and inferentially. The study had the following findings: No significance differences (F(3,318)= 2.26, P> 0.05) were found in free recall learning outcomes between learners who were taught using the three mnemonic techniques hence none of the three mnemonic techniques was found to be more appropriate for free recall learning tasks. The study recommended that, teacher trainees need to be trained on how to teach using mnemonic techniques and similar study should be replicated with samples drawn from students in secondary schools, colleges and Universities.
Article visualizations:
References
Balch, W. R. (2005). Elaborations of introductory psychology terms: Effects on test performance and subjective ratings. Teaching of Psychology, 32, 29-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15328023top3201-7
Bellezza, F. (1996). Mnemonic methods to enhance storage and retrieval. In E. L. Bjork, & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Memory: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 345-380). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Kothari, C. R. (2011). Research methodology and techniques (2nded.) Delhi: New Age International Limited Publishers.
Kombo, D. K. & Tromp, L. A. (2011). Proposal and theses writing: Nairobi: Pauline Publication.
Laing, G. (2010). An empirical test of Mnemonic devices to improve learning in elementary accounting. Journal of Education for Business, 85(6), 349-3
Levin, J. R. (1993). Mnemonic strategies and classroom learning: A twenty-year report card. Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 235-244.
Levin, J. R., Shriberg L. K., & Berry J. K, (1983). A Concrete Strategy for Remembering Abstract Prose: American Educational Research journal.
Levin, Dretzke B. J, McCormick C. B., Scruggs, T .E., McGivern J. E., & Mastropieri M. A., (1983), Learning via Mnemonic Pictures: Analysis of the Presidential Process Educational Communication and Technology Journal, Vol. 31, No. 3, pp. 161-173
Levin, J. R., Shriberg, L. K., Miller, G. E., & McCormick, C. B., (1982). The keyword method in the classroom: How to remember the states and their capitals. Elementary School Journal, 1980, 80, 186-191.
Machakos County Government, (2017). Retrieved January 2019 from http://www.machakosgovernment.com.
Mastropieri, M., Sweda, J.& Scruggs, T. (2000). Putting Mnemonic strategies to work in an inclusive classroom. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice (Lawrence Erlbaum), 15(2), 10/1/11-69-74.
Mastropieri, M. A. & Scruggs, T. E. (1998). Constructing more meaningful relationships in the classroom: A review of research on Mnemonic techniques. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 20–35.
Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & Levin, J. R. (1985). Maximizing what exceptional students can learn: A review of research on Mnemonic techniques. Remedial and Special Education, 6, 39–45.
McCabe, J. A., Osha K. L., Roche J. A., (2013),Psychology Students’ Knowledge and Use of Mnemonics: Goucher College in Baltimore, Maryland, sage journal
Melby-Lervåg, M. & Hulme C. (2010). Serial and Free Recall in Children Can Be Improved by Training: Evidence for the Importance of Phonological and Semantic Representations in Immediate Memory Tasks
Miller, G. A, Galanter E., & Pribram, K. H., (1960). Plans and the structure of behavior. New York: Henry Holt.
Orodho, A. (2009). Elements of education and social science research methods. Maseno, Kenya: Kanezja.
Petty, G. (2009). Evidence Based Teaching (2nd ed.). Nelson Thornes: Cheltenham.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
