THE VIEWPOINTS OF EDUCATIONAL MANAGERS ON EDUCATIONAL PLANNING IN TURKEY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2700Keywords:
education managers, education planning, phenomenology design, planning approach, concept of planningAbstract
The Phenomenology Design was used in the present study which aims to determine the viewpoints of educational managers on how much the educational planning processes are successful in Turkey. The Phenomenology Design is one of the Qualitative Research Methods. In recent studies that aim to investigate the relation between development and education, it has been reported that the knowledge, skills and attitudes acquired with the help of education increase the incomes of the individuals and the country. The behaviors acquired by individuals with the help of education increase the productivity in economy. Planning is defined as a design process which will take an institution or an individual to a certain goal from the present position. Educational planning may be defined as a basic roadmap to cover the needs of the society and to realize the aims of it. Educational planning is not only a topic that interests the Ministry of Education. This is a common issue of ministries responsible for planning, economy and society. The Study Group was selected with the Maximum Variety Sampling Method, which is one of the Purposeful Sampling Methods. Ten principals (n=10) working in Ankara were selected as the sample of the study. Three main themes, which were developed by the author of the study, were used in the data collection tool. These themes were Planning Concept, Planning Activities, and Application of Educational Planning. A “Semi-Structured Interview Form”, which consisted of the sub-themes of these main themes, was also used as the data collection tool. Detailed interviews were made with the participants to collect the study data. The interview records were analyzed by the author of the study, and were then converted into text on computer. It was determined in the study that the participants knew the planning concept, and were aware of using it as a management process. It was also determined that the participants did not have adequate knowledge on educational planning concept. However, it is also possible to claim that the managers that had postgraduate education had knowledge on educational planning as well. It was observed that educational planning was generally made in Teachers Board at schools in school management. It was determined that educational managers point out the importance of an applicable educational planning.
Article visualizations:
References
Âdem M. (1997). Eğitim planlaması. İkinci Basım, Ankara, Turkey
Adem M. (2008). Eğitim planlaması. Ankara, Turkey
Altundemir M. E (2012). Kalkınma planlarından eğitime bakış: kamusal mallar teorisi perspektifinden. The Journal of Knowledge Economy & Knowledge Management. Volume: VII Spring
Baker C., Wuest J., Stern, P. N. (1992). Method slurring: the grounded theory/ phenomenology example. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 17, 1355-1360.
Bayram A. (2009). Ankara İl Milli Eğitim Müdürlüğü'nde stratejik planlamanın uygulanmasına ilişkin ilköğretim müfettişi, yönetici ve diğer çalışanların görüşleri. Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi
Buraslıoğlu Z. (1994). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış. Ankara,
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Turkey
Coombs P. H. (1973). Eğitim planlaması nedir? (Çev. Cemal Mıhçıoğlu), İstanbul, Turkey
Ersoy F. (2016). Eğitimde nitel araştırma desenleri. Ankara, Turkey
Jasper M. A. (1994). Issues in phenomenology for researchers of nursing. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 19, 309- 314.
Karakütük K. (2001). Lisansüstü öğretimin planlanması. Ankara, Turkey
Karakütük K. (2016). Eğitim planlaması. Ankara, Turkey
Karakütük K. (2017). Eğitim planlaması. Ankara, Turkey
Küçüker E. (2016). Okul Müdürlerinin Planlama Etkinlikleri ve Stratejik Planlamada Karşılaşılan Sorunlar. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi Cilt:24 No:2
Kiraz Z. (2014). Türkiye'de öğretmenlerin işsizliği ve ataması yapılmayan öğretmenler hareketinin çözümlemesi. Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi. Ankara Üniversitesi
Memduhoğlu H. B., Uçar İ. H. (2012). Yönetici ve Öğretmenlerin Stratejik Planlama Algısı ve Okullarda Mevcut Stratejik Planlama Uygulamalarının Değerlendirilmesi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi, Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 12 (23), 234-256.
Miller S. (2003). Analysis of Phenomenological Data Generated with Children as Research Participants. Nurse Researcher, 10 (4), 68-82.
Patel R. M. (2002). Phenomenoloji: History, its methodological assumptions and application. Mini-dissertation. Unpublished master’s thesis, Rand Afrikaans University.
Smith J. A., Eatough V. (2007). Interpretative phenomenological analysis, in lyons E. & Coyle, A. Analysing Qualitative Data in Psychology, pp: 35-64, London, England
Şekerciler S. A. (2015). Nitel araştırma. Ankara, Turkey
Yıldırım A., Şimşek H. (2006). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara, Turkey
http://dokuman.osym.gov.tr/pdfdokuman/2017/OSYS/YER/YSay%C4%B1sal%20Bilgiler15082017.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
