GENDER AND SCIENCE ENROLMENT AND ATTAINMENT TRENDS IN SCOTLAND
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2798Keywords:
This paper presents the trend of science enrolment and attainment for the National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher in Scotland. Also, analysis of enrolment and attainment in the core science subjects of biology, chemistry and physics by gender for all threeAbstract
This paper presents the trend of science enrolment and attainment for the National 5, Higher and Advanced Higher in Scotland. Also, analysis of enrolment and attainment in the core science subjects of biology, chemistry and physics by gender for all three qualifications have been presented. Results in public domain from the Scottish Qualifications Authority (SQA) from 2008 – 2018 (for Higher and Advanced Higher) and 2014 – 2018 (for National 5) were accessed and analyzed. Data were analyzed using simple percentages and t-test for significance, using SPSS. The results show a slight decline in enrolment in the three core science subjects especially for the National 5 and Higher qualifications. An independent sample t-test conducted using SPSS, to compare the mean percentage attainment of boys and girls in Higher biology, physics and chemistry showed a significant difference in the mean percentage physics attainment for boys and girls with t(20)=9.99, p<.05. The result also shows significant difference in the mean performance by gender in all three subjects at the Advanced Higher level. The study also affirm the gross underrepresentation of girls in physics that has been reported in many countries and that a greater proportion of girls than boys generally attain better grades in science, especially in physics. Finally, the paper calls for a need for further research in investigate for instance, the persistent underrepresentation of girls in physics classrooms despite all efforts to mitigate this imbalance by government and other organizations such as the Institute of Physics (IOP), the Royal Society of Chemistry.
Article visualizations:
References
Amunga, J. K., Amadalo, M. M., & Musera, G. (2011). Disparities in chemistry and biology achievement in secondary schools: Implications for vision 2030. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science. 1(18), 226-236.
Barnes, G., McInerney, D. M. and Marsh, H. W. (2005). Exploring sex differences in science enrolment intentions: An application of the general model of academic choice. The Australian Educational Researcher, 32(2), 1-23.
Bennett, J., Lubben, F. & Hampden-Thompson (2013). Schools that make a difference to post-compulsory uptake of physical science subjects: some comparative case studies in England. International Journal of science Education, 35(4), 663-689.
Breakwell, G. M. & Beardsell, S. (1992). Gender, parental and peer influences upon science attitudes and activities. Public Understanding of Science, 1, 183-197.
Britner, S. L. (2008). Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(8), 955–970.
Buccheri, G., Gurber, N. A. and Bruhwiler, C. (2011). The impact of gender on interest in science topics and the choice of scientific and technical vocations. International Journal of Science Education, 33(1), 159-178.
Education Scotland (2018). Sciences. Retrieved online at https://education.gov.scot on 03/08/2018.
Francis, L. J., & Greer, J. E. (1999). Measuring attitude towards science among secondary school students: the affective domain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 17(2), 219-226.
Garg, K. C. and Gupta, B. M. (2003). Decline in science education in India – A case study at +2 and undergraduate level. Current Science 84(9), 1198-1201.
Gillibrand, E., Robinson, P., Brawn, R. and Osborn, A. (1999). Girls’ participation in physics in single sex classes in mixed schools in relation to confidence and achievement. International Journal of Science Education. 21(4), 349-362.
Henriksen, E. K. (2015). Introduction: Participation in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM): Presenting the challenge and introducing project IRIS. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon and J. Ryder (Eds). Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education. NY: Springer.
Houtte, M. V. (2004). Why boys achieve less at school than girls: the difference between boys’ and girls’ academic culture. Educational Studies, 30(2), 159-173.
Jackson, C. (2002). Can single-sex classes in coeducational schools enhance the learning experiences of girls and/or boys? An exploration of pupils’ perceptions. British Educational Research Journal, 28(1), 37-48.
Joint Council for Qualifications (2015, 2016, 2018). Examination Results. Retrieved online at https://www.jcq.org.uk/examination-results on 23/08/2018.
Kennedy, J. P., Lyons, T. and Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34-46.
Kessels, U. and Hannover, B. (2008). When being a girl matters less: Accessibility of gender-related self-knowledge in single-sex and coeducational classes and its impact on students’ physics-related self-concept of ability. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 273-289.
Mujtaba, T. & Reiss, M. J. (2013). What Sort of Girl Wants to Study Physics After the Age of 16? Findings from a Large-scale UK Survey. International Journal of Science Education, 35(17). 2979-2998.
Mujtaba, T., Sheldrake, R., Reiss, M. J. and Simon, S. (2018). Students’ science attitudes, beliefs, and context: associations with science and chemistry aspirations. International Journal of Science Education, 40(6), 644-667.
Ormerod, M. B. (1975). Subject preference and choice in co-educational and single-sex secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Psychology. 45(3), 257-267.
Osborne, J., Simon, S. & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049-1079.
Palmer, T., Burke, P. F. and Aubusson, P. (2017). Why students choose and reject science: a study of the factors that students consider when selecting subjects. International journal of Science Education, 39(6), 645-662.
Parker, L. H. and Rennie, L. J. (2002). Teachers’ implementation of gender-inclusive instructional strategies in single-sex and mixed-sex science classrooms. International Journal of Science Education, 24(9), 881-897.
Perera, J. & Velummayilum, P. (2008). Women’s career choice and gender roles: a South Asian experience. The Clinical Teacher, 5(3), 186 – 190.
Regan, E. and DeWitt, J. (2015). Attitudes, Interest and Factors Influencing STEM Enrolment Behaviour: An Overview of Relevant Literature. In E. K. Henriksen, J. Dillon and J. Ryder (Eds). Understanding Student Participation and Choice in Science and Technology Education. NY: Springer.
Semela, T. (2010). Who is joining physics and why? Factors influencing the choice of physics among Ethiopian university students. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education. 5(3), 319 – 340.
Stables, A. (1990). Differences between pupils from mixed and single-sex schools in their enjoyment of school subjects and in their attitude to science and to school. Educational Review, 42 (3), 221-230.
Steinmayr, R. and Spinath, B. (2008). Sex differences in school achievement: what are the roles of personality and achievement motivation? European Journal of Personality, 22, 185-209.
Tripney, J., Newman, M., Bangpan, M., Niza, C., MacKintosh, M. and Sinclair, J. (2010). Subject choice in STEM: Factors influencing young people (aged 14-19) in education – A systematic review of the UK literature. Report commissioned by the Wellcome Trust. London: University of London Institute of Education.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
