LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS IN A TABLET BASED ENGLISH LANGUAGE LAB
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.292Keywords:
learning environments, tablets, English language laboratory, TROFLEIAbstract
Now days, ICT based language laboratories are being used in schools to teach children to communicate effectively. The language lab is a technological breakthrough for learning English and is a need of the hour to enhance English language skills in students. The present study attempts to study the learning environments in a tablet based English language lab and assess its effectiveness for use with 8thand 9th class students. A widely used questionnaire i.e. Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focused Learning Environment Inventory (TROFLEI) was used to study the learning environments in a tablet based English language lab and also to assess students’ attitude towards English. The study is quantitative in nature and the sample consisted of 138 students taken from one private school of Jammu (India) where this facility was available. Apart from the study of learning environments the other objectives of the study were to compare the actual and preferred learning environments, to investigate associations between the attitudes towards English and learning environments in a tablet based language laboratory, to investigate whether gender differences exist in a tablet based English language lab and to assess the effectiveness of the tablet based English language lab for use with 8thand 9th class students. The results also show that students usually want more teaching to be done using the tablet based English language lab and it helped in the creating positive psychosocial learning environments. Results also show that there is no significant gender difference between the male and female students, which, means that both male and female students perceived their tablet based English language lab learning environment in a similar manner. Furthermore, the result of the effectiveness of the tablet based English language lab shows that 70 to 95% of the students in the group look forward to learning English in a tablet based English language lab rather than through conventional methods. They also perceived their tablet based English language lab to be more interesting, livelier, relaxed, and enjoyable.
Article visualizations:
References
Bedre, M. (2008). Bedre bhashe wonderful world of languages. Language laboratory for learning spoken and written English. Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://bedrebhashe.blogspot.in/2008/09/language-laboratory-forlearning-spoken.html
Cakir, M. (2011). Validity and Reliability of Turkish from of Technology Rich Outcome Focused Learning Environment Inventory. Education Sciences: Theory and Practice,11(4),1959-1963.
Deepika, V., & Kalaiarasan, M. (2012). The role of language lab in learning English as a second language. Journal of Technology for ELT, 2(2), 12-18.Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/.../1-role-of-language-lab-by-deepika-kalaiarasa.
Fraser, B. J., Fisher, D. L., & McRobbie, C. J. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Education Research Association, Chicago.
Gupta, S. (2007). A comparative study of the learning environments of mathematics classrooms in private and Government School of Jammu city. (M.Ed. Dissertation, University of Jammu, 2007).
Gupta, A., & Fisher, D. (2012). Technology supported learning environments in science classrooms. Learning Environment Research.15 (2), 195-216.
Kitao, K. (1995). The History of Language Laboratories--Origin and Establishment: Paper presented at department of Commerce, Doshisha University, Japan. Retrieved from Retrieved November 20, 2010, from http://www.eric.ed. gov/PDFS/ED381020.pdf
Kour, A. (2013). To study the learning environments of technology supported mathematics classroom in selected private schools of Jammu city. (M.Ed. Dissertation, University Of Jammu, 2013).
Kumari, M., Goswami, V., & Gupta, A. (2015). Learning Environments of technology-supported teacher education classrooms in relation to gender, previous qualifications and teaching subjects. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 5(1), 71-86.
Perez-Paredes, P. (2002). From Rooms to Environments: Techno-short sightedness and Language Laboratories. Retrieved August 12, 2011, from http://www.um.es/dp-filologiainglesa/ijes/vol2n1/05-PascualPerez.pdf.
Welch, A. G., Cakir, M., Peterson, C. M., & Ray, C. M. (2014). The relationship between gender and classroom environment in Turkish science classrooms. Educational Research and Reviews, 9(20), 893-903.
Welch, A.G., Cakir, M., Peterson, C., & Ray, C.M. (2012). A cross-cultural validation of the Technology-Rich Outcomes-Focussed Learning Environment Inventory (TROFLEI) in Turkey and the USA. Research in Science and Technological Education, 30, 49–63.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


