INFLUENCE OF INTERACTIVE ACTIVITIES ON STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE IN READING COMPREHENSION IN SENIOR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KADUNA, NIGERIA

Authors

  • Hanna Onyi Yusuf PhD, Department of Educational Foundations and Curriculum, Faculty of Education, Ahmadu Bello University, Samaru-Zaria, Nigeria
  • Hadiza Ahmed Tukur PhD, Department of Educatıonal Psychology, Faculty of Educatıon, Ahmadu Bello Unıversıty Zarıa, Samaru-Zaria, Nigeria

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.2966

Keywords:

interactive, activities, learning resources, inclusive education, preschools

Abstract

The research investigated the influence of interactive activities on students’ performance in reading comprehension. Two secondary schools were used for the study. Eighty (80) homogenized senior secondary school II students were used for the study, i.e 40 students from each school. The two schools were located far apart i.e Government Secondary School Doka, Kaduna North, Government Secondary School, Makera in Kaduna South. Two instruments were administered on the students. T-test was used to analyse the result of the tests. The results revealed that interactive activities had significant influence  on students’ performance in reading comprehension. The findings suggest that interactive activities are helpful in understanding and comprehending written texts. It also helps teachers to see how students’ individual thought processes are working with the information received from texts. Teachers are encouraged to use interactive activities to facilitate students’ reading comprehension. Interactive activities such as ‘turn on the meaning by engaging students in purposeful strategic conversations’ provide students with ample opportunities to interact with the text, teacher and peers. Curriculum planners are equally encouraged to include interactive activities in the reading component of the English language curriculum for senior secondary schools.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

DOI

References

Adams M. J. (1980). Failures to comprehend levels of processing in reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce & W. F. Brewer (Eds). Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. (pp.11-32) New Jersey: LEA.

Brunsdon. R. Coltheart, M. & Nickels, L. (2006). Severe developmental letter processing impairment: a treatment case study. Cognitive neuropsychology 23. (6), 795-82.

Hacker D. (1997). Metacognitive definitions and empirical foundations. In D. Hacker, D. Dunloskys, Y. A. Graecer (Eds). Metacognitive in educational theory and practice. Erlabaum. Hillshale N.B.

Oyetude A. (2010). The teaching of reading and writing in junior secondary schools: an appraisal. Nigeria Educational Forum. Zaria: 12(1), 43-49

Oyetunde T. O. (2009). Beginning reading scheme empowering teachers to help their pupils become good teachers. Jos: LECAPS publishers

Perfetti, C. (1985). Reading ability. model of word-form encoding in speech productions, cognition, New York 64, 249.284.

Ruddel, F. B., Ruddel M. R. & Singer, H. (1994). Classrooms instruction in reading. N.Y: Longman.

Stanovich, K. E. (1993). Toward an interactive compensatory model of individual difference in the development of reading fluency, reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32.71

Yusuf H. O. (2010). The effect of using instructional conversation method in teaching reading comprehension in selected Junior Secondary Schools in Kaduna Metropolis in Oyetunde et al. Improving Educational Standards in Nigeria. Prospects, Challenges and Strategies. Jos: Lecaps

Yusuf H. O. (2013). Influence of vocabulary instruction on students’ performance in reading comprehension. Journal of Research in Arts and Social Science Education. Vol 4(3), 63-68. Zaria: ABU Press.

Downloads

Published

2020-03-31

Issue

Section

Articles