INFORMATION PROCESSING AS LEARNING STRATEGY: THE CASE OF GRAPHIC ORGANISERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.3023Keywords:
graphic organisers, language learning strategies, cognitive overload, schema, dual codingAbstract
The use of information processing is one of many language learning skills learners can use to help them strategize their learning. One example of information processing is through the use of graphic organisers. It has been reported that learners use different strategies to lean a new language. However, the use of these language learning strategies is further facilitated with the help of graphic organisers. Furthermore, using graphic organisers is compensatory strategy where leaners replaces written information to pictures. While doing so, learners are able to use their metacognitive strategies to make plans for more learning. In addition to that, learning another language is less challenging when they do not have as much previous background of words as they had in their mother tongue. The use of graphic organisers helped learners learn language in a less wordy way; perhaps even in a less threatening environment. This quantitative case study used survey as the instrument to investigate how language learners fell about the use of graphic organisers as part of their language-related activities. The instrument uses 5 Likert scale and has 4 sections. Section A is the demographic profile, section B is the Cognitive Overload, section C is the Schema and Section D is the Dual Coding. Findings revealed interesting pedagogical implications towards the use of graphic organisers in the language classrooms.
Article visualizations:
References
Broadbent, D. (1958). Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press.
Carufel, R. (2018). No, Millennials’ Attention Spans aren’t Shrinking-They’re Getting More Selective. Agility-PR Solutions. Retrieved from https://www.agilitypr.com/pr-news/public-relations/no-millennials-attention-spans-arent-shrinking-theyre-getting-more-selective/.
Conley, G. K. (2008). The Effect of Graphic Organisers on the Academic Achievement of High School Students in United States History who received Instruction in Blended, Computer-Based Learning. A Doctoral Dissertation School of Education, Liberty University. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/58825092.pdf
Delrose, L. N. (2011). Investigating the Use of Graphic Organisers for Writing. Masters Dissertation, Louisiana State University, Retrieved from https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=3536&context=gradschool_theses.
Goh, E. (2019). Gen Zs and Millennials, Your Learning Attention Span Isn’t Just 8 Seconds. Smartup. Retrieved from https://www.smartup.io/2019/08/05/gen-zs-and-millennials-your-learning-attention-span-isnt-just-8-seconds/.
Habok, A., Magyar, A. (2018). The Effect of Language Learning Strategies on Proficiency, Attitudes and School Achievement. Frontiers in Psychology, Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02358/full.
Hardan, A. A. (2013). Language Learning Strategies: A General Overview. Procedia Social and Behavioural Sciences. Vol 106. Pp 1712-1726. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/82653331.pdf
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2008). Educational administration theory, research, and practice (8th ed.) (E. Barrosse & D. S. Patterson, Eds.). New York: McGraw Hill.
Institute for the Advancement of Research in Education. (2003). Graphic organizers: a review of scientifically based research. Retrieved from http://www.inspiration.com/sites/default/files/documents/Detailed-Summary.pdf.
Kansizoglu, H. B. (2017). The Effect of Graphic Organizers on language Teaching and Learning Areas: A Meta-Analysis Study. Education and Science. Vol 42(191) pp 139-164. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318253303_The_Effect_of_Graphic_Organizers_on_Language_Teaching_and_Learning_Areas_A_Meta-Analysis_Study
Laskaris, J. (2015). How to Engage Millennials: Important Moves. eLearning. Retrieved from https://www.efrontlearning.com/blog/2016/03/5-strategies-to-engage-the- millennials.html.
Meltzer, D. (2017). Combating the Millennial Attention Span to Keep your Team Engaged. Entrepreneur Insider. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/297833.
O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U., (1990). Learning Strategies in Second Language Acquisition. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language Learning Strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
Rahmat, N. H. (2020). Innovation in Education: Barriers and Facilitating factors. European Journal of Education Studies. Vol 6(10, pp 55-66.Retrieved from https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejes/article/view/2784.
Rahmat, N. H. (2018). Scaffolding Colour Codes and SAW Approach in ESL Academic Writing. European Journal of English language Teaching, Vol 491), pp 22-34. Retrieved from https://oapub.org/edu/index.php/ejel/article/view/1881.
Sharma, A. (2018). Designing Learning for Millennials. Association for Talent Developer. Retrieved from https://www.td.org/magazines/td-magazine/designing-learning-for-millennials.
Rahmat, N. H. (2011). Approaches in the Teaching of ESL Writing. Selangor, Malaysia: UiTM Press.
Tayib, A. (2015). The Effect of Using Graphic Organisers on Writing (A Case Study of Preparatory College Students at UMM-Al-Qura University). International Journal of English Language and Linguistics Research. Vol 3(1), pp15-36. Retrieved from http://www.eajournals.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Effect-of-Using-Graphic Organizers-on-Writing.pdf.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


