THE VIEWS OF PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS CONCERNING THE USE OF LOCAL DIALECT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3276Keywords:
teacher candidate, local dialect, qualitative research, interview, content analysisAbstract
This study aims to examine the opinions of teacher candidates on the use of local dialect. 50 teacher candidates, who attended Kafkas, Kilis 7 Aralık and Atatürk Universities in 2019-2020 academic year from different branches and class levels, were chosen according to convenience sampling, and participated in the study which was designed as qualitative research and a case study. The data were collected through the five-question semi-structured interview form, developed by the researchers, and were analyzed with the content analysis method. As a result of the study, it was determined that teacher candidates did not lean towards the use of local dialect mostly, but they felt comfortable while using the local dialect and did not find it necessary to make efforts to reduce the use of local dialect. Besides, it was determined that teacher candidates thought that the city they were born or lived in had an impact on the uses of local dialect, and they used the local dialect most often with their families and their friends.
Article visualizations:
References
Akkaya, A. (2012). The opinions of teacher candidates about speech problems. Mustafa Kemal University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 9(20), 405-420. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/mkusbed/issue/19549/208420.
Alford, R. L. & Judith, B. S. (1990). Attitudes of native and nonnative speakers toward selected regional accents of U.S. English. ESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 479-495. Doi: 10.2307/3587231.
Alyılmaz, S. & Alyılmaz, C. (2018). The importance of dialectology studies in regards to Turkish teaching. Journal of Language and Literature, 45, 7-38. Doi: 10.24155/tdk.2018.55.
Büyükikiz, K. K. & Hasırcı, S. (2013). The importance of speaking skill in mother tongue education. Research in Reading & Writing Instruction, 1(1), 57-63. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/oyea/issue/20479/218126.
Cheshire, J. & Trudgill, P. (1989). Dialect and education in the United Kingdom. ed. J. Cheshire, V. Edwards, H. Münstermann ve B. Weltens. Dialect and education. Philadelphia: Multilingual Matters, 94-109.
Demir, N. (2002). Ağız terimi üzerine. Türkbilig, 4, 105-116.
Demir, S. & Gül Özdil, B. (2019). Speaking skills of secondary school students by teachers’ opinions. Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(3), 865-881. Doi: 10.17240/aibuefd.2019.19.49440-431301.
Dilekmen, M. & Başçı, Z. (2008). Eğitim fakültesi öğrencilerinin iletişim becerileri. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 12(2), 223-231. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2822/38075.
Dunstan, S. B. & Jaeger, A. (2015). Dialect and influences on the academic experiences of college students. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 777-803. Doi: 10.1080/00221546.2015.11777383.
Ekberg, L. & Östman, Jan-Ola (2020). Identity construction and dialect acquisition among immigrants in rural areas - the case of Swedish-language Finland. Journal of Multilingual & Multicultural Development. Doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1722681.
Er, O. & Demir, Ö. (2013). An investigation of speaking skills of Turkish teachers from the viewpoint of the preservice Turkish teaching teachers. Turkish Studies, 8(1), 1417-1436. Doi: 10.7827/TurkishStudies.3696.
Erdem, İ. (2013). Speech disorders encountered during speech therapy and therapy techniques. Adıyaman University Journal of Social Sciences, 6(11), 415-452. Doi: 10.14520/adyusbd.453.
Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş (A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu, Trans.). Ankara: Anı (Original work published 2011).
Gündüz, O. & Şimşek, T. (2014). Anlatma teknikleri 2 konuşma eğitimi. Ankara: Grafiker.
Gürlek, M. & Aksu, E. (2013). Konuşma hataları. In A. Kılınç & A. Şahin (Ed). Konuşma eğitimi (pp. 181-197). Ankara: Pegem.
Karakoç Öztük, B. & Altuntaş, İ.(2012). Teachers’ views about speaking education in elementary school: A qualitative study. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 1(2), 342-356.
McMillan, J. & Schumacher, S. (2010). Research in education evidence-based inquiry (7th Edition). Boston: Pearson.
Miles, M. & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
Pehlivan, A. (2012). Öğretmen adaylarının Anadolu ağızlarına yönelik tutum ölçeğinin geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Bilig, 63, 135-158.
Rabanus, S. (2019). Language mapping worldwide: Methods and traditions. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.). Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 103-129). Cham: Pearson.
Röthlisberger, M. & Szmrecsanyi, B. (2019). Dialect typology: Recent advances. In S. D. Brunn & R. Kehrein (Eds.). Handbook of the changing world language map (pp. 131-156). Cham: Pearson Yay.
Sarikaya, B. (2019). Problems and solution proposals for Turkish education teachers working in rural areas: Muş sample. Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 43, 151-171. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/yyusbed/issue/44211/545674.
Sönmez, V. & Alacapınar, G. F. (2011). Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Anı.
Temizyürek, F., Erdem, İ. & Temizkan, M. (2017). Konuşma eğitimi sözlü anlatım. Ankara: Pegem.
Topçuoğlu Ünal, F. & Degeç, H. (2012). The problems in speaking education according to teacher’ judgements. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 7(5), 735-750. Doi: 10.9761/JASSS178
Topçuoğlu Ünal, F. & Özden, M. (2015). Diksiyon ve konuşma eğitimi. Ankara: Pegem.
Toptaş, B. & Sönmez, A. (2015). Effects on the right and effective speaking skills of individual voice training course in school of fine arts department of music. İnönü University Journal of Culture and Art, 1(1), 1-15. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/ijca/issue/7995/105017
Uçgun, D. (2007). The factors affecting the speaking education. Erciyes University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 22, 59-67.
Yelok, V. S. & Dolunay, S. K. (2007). Telaffuz meselesi ve ülkemizde telaffuz eğitimi. Türk Yurdu 27(239), 63-66.
Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2008). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin.
Yıldırım, B. (2015). The use of local components in humour and development of social criticism discourse: In the case of Fırfırik magazine published in Erzurum. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 19(2), 121-160. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunisosbil/issue/2839/38770.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
