TRAINING SCHOOL ADMINISTRATIVES AS MENTOR PRINCIPALS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i10.3281Keywords:
school administrators, training of school administrators, mentoringAbstract
Processing and management of information in the new age is being completed by the schools which are as seen the most important molder of the community, and for managing and maintain this image in the best way of course is the ultimate task of the school administrators. To execute this special task, the training of school administrators has an extreme importance and even recruiting them as school principals also another issue to consider about. However, when the criteria of becoming school principals is analyzed in Turkey, it is observed that there is a huge gap about this situation, whereas present trainings for school principals found not to supply the demand of school administrators. From this point of view, in this study the most popular trainings for school administrators abroad are reviewed, and it is found that mentoring system which is one of the training methods is very effective, thus, a mentor principal training was prepared by education experts and this training was given to 11 school administrators. As a result of this, an experimental study was conducted in order to scrutinize implications of mentor principal training. Two groups of 11 school administrators were chosen through random cluster sampling. Both groups were given a pre-test and a post-test. T-test analysis was done, and results of pre-test and post-test mean scores of the experimental group, which got mentor principal training, were meaningfully different in positive way. Lastly, both the main and the sub-hypotheses of the study were confirmed. Thus, the results provide a theoretical justification for the claims of the training school principals who got this training had positive perceptions through mentoring.
Article visualizations:
References
ActivElp Mentoring Guidelines (2009). Mentors Activate European Language Portfolio Through Multimedia Project. p.101-103
Brunner, R., & Hill, D. (1992). Using learning styles research in coaching. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation &Dance, 63(4), 2628,61.
Bakioğlu, A. ( 2012). Eğitimde Mentorluk. Nobel Kitapevi. Ankara. p.41-45
Beldon, E. (1994). Pre and Post Learning Assessment of ASL Proficiency. p. 38-40
BİLMED (2009). Bilkent Üniversitesi Mezunlar Derneği. Mentorluk Çalışma Programı.
Browne-Ferrigno, T., & Muth, R. (2006). Leadership mentoring and situated learning: Catalysts for principal ship readiness and lifelong learning. Mentoring & Tutoring. Partnership in Learning, 14(3), p.275-295.
Ş. Büyüköztürk, Ö. E. Akgün, Ö. Özkahveci, F. Demirel (2004). The validity and reliability study of the Turkish version of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 4 (2) (2004), p.231-237
Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2007). Deneysel Desenler. Öntest-Sontest Kontrol Grubu Desen ve Veri Analizi. Pregem Yayıncılık.Ankara. p, 47-49
Çınar, Zehra (2003). Coaching and Mentoring, Paradoks, Sosyoloji, Sosyoloji ve Politika Dergisi (e-dergi), http://www.paradoks.org, ISSN 1305-7979 – Yıl:3, Sayı:1, 26/04/2007.
Çelik, S. (2011). Kütüphaneci Eğitiminde Mentorluk Uygulaması: Doğuş Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi Örneği. Bilgi Dünyası, 12(2) p.295-318.
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and conduction mixed-methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. p.94-95
Clutterbuck, D., Cox, E. & Bachkirowa, T. (2010). The Complete Handbook of Coaching. London: Sage. p.24-32
Fritzberg, G. J. & Alemayehu, A. (2004). Mutual Mentoring: Co-Narrating an Educative Friendship Between an Education Professor and an Urban Youth. The Urban Review, Vol. 36, No. 4.DOI: 10.1007/s11256-004-2085-x
Ismail, M., & Arokiasamy, L. (2007). Exploring Mentoring as a Tool for Career Advancement of Academics in Private Higher Education Institutions in Malaysia. The Journal of International Social Research Volume. 1(1), 135-148.
Keller, P. (2012). Center for Excellence in Peer Education. International Mentor. P,67-71.
Mentoring Partnership of Minnesota (2007). Tools for Mentoring Adolescents: Setting Mentoring Boundaries. Search Institute, Minneapolis, Minnesota. p.55-56.
Mentoring Preparation Program (2015). Youth and Shelter Services. Ames, Iowa 50010; Support Mentoring Handbook Manual. Do’s and Don’ts of Mentoring.p.72-74.
New Teacher Center (2013). Executive Summary, Leading Learning Communities, Standards for What Principals Should Know and Be Able to Do. p.41-42.
Nea (2005). The Mentor’s 13 job. www.nea.org.mentoring. accessed on 11.01.2012.
Ravid, R. (1994). Practical statistics for educators. New York: University Press of America. p.32-33.
Sezgin F., Koşar S., & Er E. (2014). Okul Yöneticisi ve Öğretmen Yetiştirmede Mentorluk Sürecinin İncelenmesi. Eylül 2014 Cilt:22 No:3 Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi 1337-1356.Gazi Üniversitesi, Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Bölümü, Ankara
Yıldırım, R., & Yılmaz E. (2013). Okul Yöneticilerinin Mentorluk Rollerinin Okulun Akademik Başarısı ve Bazı Değişkenler Açısından İncelenmesi. Muğla Sıtkı Koçman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Sayı 30, 2013 Bahar,p, 98 – 119.
Wallace, S. & Gravells J. (2012). Mentoring Yourself: The Reflective Mentor. 2008 SAGE Publications. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446278697.n7.
Witherspoon, R., & White, R. P. (1996). Executive Coaching: A Continuum Roles of Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research (Special Issue on Executive Coaching.4812, p.124-133).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


