LOOPHOLE: EXPECTATIONS OF FORMING DIGITAL PUBLIC OPINION AND MEDIA REPRESENTATIONS OF DIGITAL CITIZENSHIP
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i12.3403Keywords:
digital citizenship, digital culture, digital public opinion, social networking, decision making process, Moria Refugee Camp, sentiment analysis, TwitterAbstract
Society is a living organism and its dynamics highly dependent upon other variables such as culture, economy, technology, etc. New developments in any of them, also change our everyday lives, expectations, attitudes, and behaviors. Nowadays, the changes in society tend to be somewhat very quick as the new digital circumstances require abrupt decisions, instantaneous likes, or dislikes emitted to shape the so-called ‘digital public opinion’. It’s much easier to create a new public agenda, to learn about a subject, to gather, interpret, present, or hide opinions in this new digital platform. As citizens of digital culture, all participants are expected to be aware of the new dimensions of digital citizenship with shared responsibility. Societies seem to be improving digital aspects to form a public opinion, specifically within the last two decades. This paper aims to explore the new concept of digital citizenship and recent applications of digital public opinion whereas it exemplifies how the data is drawn from traditional public sources and how they are linked to the digital world to shape digital public opinion quickly. The reactions and counter-reactions to digital public opinion are much more visible, measurable, and valuable since it causes rapid and radical changes in society. The paper concentrates on the refugee issues in general and specifically the fire in Moria affecting more than 20000 people, including around 7000 children. How these kids were mobilized and how the decision made through digital citizenship is questioned. The paper also has some sentiment analysis correlates the results with actual events such as 5000 thousand people marching in Germany.
Article visualizations:
References
Bohn, R. E., & Short, J. E. (2009). How much information? 2009.Report on American Consumers (Tech. Rep.). Global Information Industry Center. University of California, San Diego.
Brysk, A. & Shafir, G. (2004). Introduction Globalization and the Citizen Gap, eds. Alison Brysk-Gershon Shafir, People Out of Place Globalization, Human Rights and the Citizen Gap, Routledge: New York, 3-9.
Cardoso, G. (2006). The Media in the Network Society: Browsing, News, Filters and Citizenship, Lisbon: Portugal. CIES – Centre for Research and Studies in Sociology.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System Politics and Power, Oxford University Press:
Gere Charlie (2008). Digital Culture, London: Reaktion Books.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-45271194
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-54094683
https://www.cbc.ca/news/world/greece-lesbos-moria-camp-fire-1.5718519
https://www.dw.com/en/germany-to-take-in-some-1500-migrants-from-greece/a-54930075
https://www.dw.com/en/greece-refugee-camp-fire/a-54861061
https://www.dw.com/en/moria-migrants-germany-greece-lesbos/a-54866264
https://www.dw.com/en/thousands-march-in-berlin-to-demand-germany-take-in-moria-refugees/a-54997956
https://www.dw.com/tr/almanların-yarısı-moriadan-sıgnmacı-alınmasından-yana/a-54888366
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary
https://www.webtekno.com/turkiye-sahte-haberlere-en-cok-guvenen-country-was-h48103.html
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8v-OHi3iGQI
Lutz, W. (2007). Population development enlarges European identity in time. Demos 23
Marshall, T. H. (1992). The Problem Stated with the Assistance of Alfred Marshall. In Citizenship and Social Class, eds. T. H. Marshall and T. Bottomore, London: Pluto Perspectives, 3-51.
Mossberger, K., Tolbert, C. J. and McNeal, R. S. (2008). Digital Citizenship the Internet, Society and Participation, The MIT Press: Cambridge.
Musgrave, L. Megan (2016) Digital Citizenship in Twenty-First-Century Young Adult Literature Imaginary Activism, New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
New York.
Pembecioğlu, N. (2012). Building Identities - Living in the Hybrid Society. The Scientific Journal of Humanistic Studies, Romania: Argonaut Publishing House, 4(7), 46-59.
Pembecioğlu, N. (2019). Media Literacy in the 21st Century - International Basics and Citizenship Practices. European Journal of Education Studies. Volume 6, Issue 9, pp. 158-192.
Ribble, M. & Bailey, G. (2007). Digital Citizenship in Schools, USA: International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE).
Simon T, Goldberg A, Aharonson-Daniel L, Leykin D, Adini B (2014) Twitter in the Cross Fire—The Use of Social Media in the Westgate Mall Terror Attack in Kenya. PLoS ONE 9(8): e104136. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104136
Turner, Bryan S. (1993). ‘Preface’, in Bryan S. Turner (ed.) Citizenship and Social Theory, London: Sage.
Vromen, A. (2017) Digital Citizenship and Political Engagement the Challenge from Online Campaigning and Advocacy Organizations, Palgrave MacMillan: London.
Warschauer, M. (2003) Technology and Social Inclusion: Rethinking the Digital Divide. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


