DOES VISUAL-SPATIAL COGNITION AFFECT CHILDREN’S ASTRONOMICAL EXPERIENCES?

Authors

  • Felicita Gali Department of Education, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India
  • Sudhakar Venukapalli Dr., Department of Education, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i1.3522

Keywords:

spatial ability, conceptual understanding, astronomy, spatial orientation, and spatial visualization

Abstract

Understanding of astronomical phenomena requires spatial reasoning skills. The current study examines the influence of spatial ability on conceptual understanding of secondary school students in elementary astronomy. The sample consisted of 38 ninth-grade students from a high school in Hyderabad. To evaluate participants’ spatial ability, spatial reasoning test, Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations and mental rotation tests were used. Mental Rotation, Spatial Perception, and Spatial Visualization are the types of spatial ability tested in this study. To understand learners conceptual understanding in astronomy, 30 probes on astronomical topics were administered. The research study was quantitative in nature. Correlational analysis showed that all three spatial sub-skills namely Spatial Orientation, Mental rotation and Spatial Visualization is associated with astronomy conceptual understanding. The correlation coefficient of overall spatial ability and conceptual understanding was 0.693 (p < 0.05). The result of an independent t-test suggested that there is no major impact of gender on spatial ability and conceptual understanding in astronomy. The researchers suggest that teachers should develop spatially enriched lessons that help students improve their spatial thinking skills and a deeper conceptual understanding of basic astronomical concepts.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Felicita Gali, Department of Education, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India
    Felicita Gali is currently undertaking her PhD in Education at The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India. She holds master’s degrees in Physics and Education. Her areas of research interests are Science Education, Pedagogical Sciences, and Cognitive Science.
  • Sudhakar Venukapalli, Dr., Department of Education, The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India
    Sudhakar Venukapalli is currently working as the Professor of Education at The English and Foreign Languages University, Hyderabad, India. His research areas of interest are Cognitive Science, Philosophy of Science, Policy Studies in Education and Liberal Arts Education.

References

Al-Balushi, S., & Al-Battashi, I. A. (2013). Ninth graders' spatial ability and working memory capacity (WMC) in relation to their science and mathematics achievement and their gender. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 10(1), 12-27.

Bayraktar, S. (2009). Pre-service primary teachers’ ideas about lunar phases. Journal of Turkish Science Education. 6: 12-23.

Black, A. A. (2005). Spatial ability and earth science conceptual understanding. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53(4), 402–414. https://doi.org/10.5408/1089-9995-53.4.402.

Bodner, G. & Guay, R. (1997). The Purdue Visualization of Rotations Test. The Chemical Educator, 2. 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00897970138a.

Callison, P. L. & Wright, E. L. (1993). The effect of teaching strategies using models on pre-service elementary teachers’ conceptions about Earth–Sun–Moon relationships [Paper presentation]. Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Atlanta, GA.

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities. Cambridge University Press.

ChanLin, L-J. (2000). Attributes of animation for learning scientific knowledge. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 27(4), 228-238.

Cole, Cohen, Wilhelm, & Lindell (2018). Spatial thinking in astronomy education research. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 14, 010139.

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C. P., Geary, D. C., Gur, R. C., Hyde, J. S., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8(1), 1-51.

Heyer, I., Slater, S., & Slater, T. (2012). Understanding the correlations among undergraduates’ spatial reasoning skills and their ability to learn astronomy. Revista Latino-Americana de Educação em Astronomia, n.16, p. 45-61.

Hoffman, M., Gneezy, U. & List, J.(2011) Nurture affects gender differences in spatial abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Published online August 29, 2011:14786-14788. doi:10.1073/pnas.1015182108.

Keeley, P. & Sneider, C. (2011). Uncovering student ideas in astronomy, 45 new formative assessment probes. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.

Linn, M. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: a meta-analysis. Child Dev. 56, 1479–1498. doi:10.2307/1130467.

Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.

Maeda, Y., & Yoon, S. (2013). A meta-analysis on gender differences in mental rotation ability measured by the Purdue spatial visualization tests: Visualization of rotations (PSVT:R). Educational Psychology Review, 25, 69-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-012-9215-x.

Mohapatra, J. K. (1991). The interaction of cultural rituals and the concepts of science in student learning: a case study on solar eclipse. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 431-437.

Padalkar, S. & Ramadas, J. (2008). Modeling the round earth through diagrams. Astronomy Education Review, 6 (2), 54-74.

Padalkar, S., & Ramadas, J. (2011, January 5-9). Using Diagrams as an effective pedagogic tool in elementary Astronomy. In S. Chunawala and M. Kharatmal (Eds.), Proceedings of epi STEME-4 conference, Mumbai, 159-164.

Peters, M., Laeng, B., Latham, K., Jackson, M., Zaiyouna, R., & Richardson, C. (1995). A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotations test-different versions and factors that affect performance. Brain and cognition, 28(1), 39-58.

Plummer, J. D. (2014). Spatial thinking as the dimension of progress in an astronomy: Learning progression. Studies in Science Education, 50(1), 1-45.

Plummer, J. D., & L. Maynard, L. (2014). Building a learning progression for celestial motion: An exploration of students’ reasoning about the seasons. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51, 902.

Ramful, A., Lowrie, T., & Logan, T. (2016). Measurement of spatial ability: Construction and validation of the spatial reasoning instrument for middle school students. Journal of Psycho Educational Assessment, 35(7), 709-727.

Roberts, J. E., & Bell, M. A. (2002). The effects of age and sex on mental rotation performance, verbal performance, and brain electrical activity. Developmental Psychobiology, 40(4), 391-407. https://doi.org/10.1002/dev.10039.

Rudmann, D. S. (2002). Solving astronomy problems can be limited by intuited knowledge, spatial ability or both. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, L.A.

Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1996). Mental models of the Earth, Sun, and Moon: Indian children’s cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11(4), 491–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0885-2014(96)90015-5.

Sneider, C. & Pulos, S. (1983). Children's cosmographies: Understanding the Earth's shape and gravity. Science Education, 67, 205-221.

Sneider, C., Bar, V., & Kavanagh, C. (2011). Learning about seasons: A guide for teachers and curriculum developers. Astronomy Education Review, 10, 010103-1.

Spinath, B., Spinath, F. M., Harlaar, N., & Plomin, R. (2006). Predicting school achievement from general cognitive ability, self-perceived ability, and intrinsic value. Intelligence, 34(4), 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2005.11.004.

Subramaniam, K. & Padalkar, S. (2009). Visualisation and reasoning in explaining the phases of the Moon. International Journal of Science Education, 31 (3), 395-417.

Turk, C. (2016). The Correlation between pre-service science teachers’ astronomy achievement, attitudes towards astronomy and spatial thinking skills. Journal of Education and Learning, 5( 2).

Venkateswaran T. V. (2010). Role play based approach for elementary astronomy education. Vigyan Prasar, New Delhi, India.

Voyer, D., Voyer, S., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117(2), 250-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599.

Wellington, J. J., Osborne, J., & Wellington, J. (2001). Language and literacy in science education. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Wellner, K. (1995). A correlational study of seven projective spatial structures with regard to the phases of the moon[ Doctoral dissertation]. University of Iowa.

Wilhelm, J. (2009). Gender differences in lunar-related scientific and mathematical understandings. International Journal of Science Education, 31(15), 2105-2122.

Wilhelm, J., Jackson, C., Sullivan, A., Wilhelm, R. (2013). Examining differences between preteen groups’ spatial-scientific understandings: A quasi-experimental study. Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 337-351.

Wilhelm, J., Toland, M. D., & Cole, M. (2017). Evaluating middle school students’ spatial-scientific performance within earth/space astronomy in terms of gender and race/ethnicity. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health (JESEH), 3(1), 40-51.

Yoon, S. Y. (2011). Revised Purdue Spatial Visualization Test: Visualization of Rotations (Revised PSVT:R) [Psychometric Instrument].

Downloads

Published

2021-01-09

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).