MOST EFFECTIVE INTERNATIONALLY EMERGING IMPLEMENTATION MODELS IN TEACHER PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS OVER THE LAST DECADE

Authors

  • Abdulla Al Darayseh Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Sultan Al Sadi Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
  • Yahia Alramamneh Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i7.3821

Keywords:

professional development, implementation models, teacher, meta-analysis

Abstract

This study aims to identify effective internationally emerging implementation models in teacher professional development. Several trends in teacher Professional Development are influencing the nature and quality of teacher professional development. The meta-analysis method was used in this study by identifying, collecting, and analysis potential studies to reach the findings. The results show that professional development has the potential to transform the education scene when supported by all industry players. Policy plays a vital role in the success of programs like PD programs. Policies surrounding the government of this model should be carefully structured to guide the PD programs appropriately as well as formulators should be industry players who understand the drivers that affect the education sector and in particular the educators. Good policy choices will mean that the PD stands a chance to be effective. The PD program should be provided with all the necessary resources for it to be effective and to enable smooth running. Educators should be facilitated with the necessary materials they require for the program. Lack of resources means that the PD program will not achieve its intended goals. Resources might be learning resources for the educator, allowances among many others. Extensive collaborations should be done by the sectors that could play a strong role in affecting the education, stakeholders, investors and other parties related in order to reach an agreement on the best model of PD. Additionally, there is a need to determine how best to run the PD programs to be beneficial to the education system.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Abdulla Al Darayseh, Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Abdulla Al Darayseh, Learning and Development Department, Science Education and Teachers Professional Development.
  • Sultan Al Sadi, Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Sultan Al Sadi, Learning and Development Department, Math Education and Teachers Professional Development.
  • Yahia Alramamneh, Dr., Emirates College for Advanced Education, PO Box 126662, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Yahia Alramamneh, Learning and Development Department, Arabic Education and Teachers Professional Development.

References

Al-Dossary, A. (2020). International handbook of teacher education training & re-training system in modern world.

Allen, J. P., Pianta, R. C., Gregory, A., Mikami, A. Y., & Lun, J. (2011). An interaction-based approach to enhancing secondary school instruction and student achievement. Science, 333(6045), 1034-37.

Bautista, A., Wong, J., Gopinathan, S. (2015). Psychology, society, & education. 7(3), 311-326. DOI: 10.25115/psye.v7i3.523

Bell, B. G., J. (1996). Teacher development: A model from science education. Falmer Press.

Canagarajah, S. (2015). TESOL as a professional community: A Half‐Century of pedagogy, research, and theory. Tesol Quarterly, 50(1) https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.275

Clarke, D. H., H. (2002). Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-967.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. Learning Policy Institute.

Desimone, L. M., & Garet, M. S. (2008). The impact of two professional development interventions on early reading instruction and achievement. Best Practices in Teachers’ Professional Development in the United States, 7(3), 252-263.

Falk, J. H. & Dierking, L. D. (2002). Learning from museums: Visitor experiences and the making of meaning. AltaMira Press.

Fielding, Glen D., Schalock, H. Del & Oregon Univ., Eugene. Center for Educational Policy and Management & ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (1985). Promoting the professional development of teachers and administrators. ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management.

Frasera,C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L. & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing professional

development: Contested concepts,

understandings and models. Journal of in-Service Education, 33(2), 153-169.

Ganser, T. (2000). An ambitious vision of professional development for teachers. NASSP Bulletin, 84(618), 6-12. https://doi.org/10.1177/019263650008461802

Garet, M., Wayne, A., Stancavage, F., Taylor, J., Eaton, M., Walters, K., & Doolittle, F. (2011). Middle school mathematics professional development impact study: Findings after the second year of implementation (NCEE 2011-4024). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.

Glatthorn, A. (1995). Teacher Development In: Anderson, L. (ed.), international encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (second edition ed.). Pergamon Press.

Sahlberg, P. (2016). The global educational reform movement and its impact on schooling. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. https://10.1002/9781118468005.ch7

U.S. Department of Education. (2012). National center for education statistics, schools and staffing survey (SASS), public and private teachers data file.

Wei, R, C., Darling-Hammond, L., & Adamson, F. (2010). Professional development in the United States: Trends and challenges.

Wellcome Trust (2006). Believers, seekers and sceptics.

Downloads

Published

2021-07-01

Issue

Section

Articles