EXAMINING OF THE METAPHORIC PERCEPTIONS OF PRIMARY EDUCATION TEACHERS ABOUT THE CONCEPT OF “SAVING”
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i3.4200Keywords:
metaphor, primary education, savingAbstract
This study analyzes the conceptual metaphors of primary school teacher candidates’ perceptions of “saving”. In the study, which was carried out according to the qualitative research methodology, the forms, frequencies and functions of 93 metaphorical usages related to saving were shown. In the study carried out using the qualitative research method, a basic qualitative research pattern was used and qualitative data were obtained through metaphors. The participants of the research, 205 primary education teachers participated in in-service training courses/seminars in the central Tarsus, Akdeniz, Yenişehir and Mezitli districts of Mersin province and Tarsus, Erdemli and Silifke districts, in the 2018-2019 academic year. The convenience sampling method was preferred in determining the study group of the research. The data of the research were collected through an opinion form, which was created by using structured pattern questions. Pattern questions used in this form are expressed as “Saving is …; because it is ...” and “When I think of saving, the first word that comes to mind is …” and “When I think of saving, the first person that comes to mind is …”. Content analysis technique was used in the analysis and interpretation of the data. The results showed that 93 different metaphors related to the concept of “saving” were produced by 205 primary education teachers participating in the research and the most mentioned metaphors were “future”, “water” and “life”. Primary education teachers stated 68 kinds of metaphors related to the first word that came to their minds about the concept of “savings” and the metaphors they mentioned the most were “Money”, “accumulation” and “thrift”. Regarding the first person that comes to mind about the concept of “saving”, it was seen that the primary education teachers stated 23 types of metaphors, and the metaphors they stated the most were “mother”, “father” and “wife”.
Article visualizations:
References
Arslan, M. M. & Bayrakci, M. (2006). An examination of metaphorical thinking and learning from educational view. National Education, 35(171), 100-108.
Bayhan, P., Yukselen, A. & Kaysılı, B. K. (2010). The study of children’s understanding of economic causation according to age differences. Education and Science, 32(143), 3-12.
Cebeci, O. (2013). Metaphor and structural features of poetic language. İstanbul: İthaki Yayınları.
Cetin, B. (2014). The relation of education and development: the sample of turkey. Unpublished master’s thesis, Karamanoglu Mehmetbey University Social Sciences Institute, Karaman.
Cicek, A. (2000). Social and cultural factors affecting the consumption and saving trends of families from various income profiles: A survey study of Elazig. Unpublished master’s thesis, Fırat University Social Sciences Institute, Elazig.
Devellioglu, F. & Kilickini, N. (1975). Ottoman-Turkish school dictionary. Istanbul: Rafet Zaimler Bookstore.
Dogan, M. (1996). Large Turkish dictionary. Ankara: Iz Publishing.
Ergenekon, S. (1996). Sociological factors affecting the tendency to save. Unpublished doctoral thesis. Istanbul University Social Sciences Institute, Istanbul.
Hayta, A. B. (2008). Ailelerin tasarruf ve yatırım eğilimlerinin incelenmesi. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 16(2), 345-358.
Kanik, Z. B. (2017). Education and saving relation: An implementation for Turkey. Unpublished master's thesis, Cankaya University Social Sciences Institute. Ankara.
Lakoff, G. & Johnson, M. (2005). Metaphors: Life, meaning and language (Translator: G.Y. Demir). Istanbul: Paradigm Publishing.
Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Morgan, G. (1998). Metaphor in management and organization theory (Translator: G. Bulut). Istanbul: MESS.
Ozer, M. H. (2018). The truth of saving in a globalizing world (pp. 1-423). I. International Symposium on Contemporary Education and Social Sciences, Antalya-Turkiye, 22-25 November, available at: http://www.iscess.com/Content_Files/Content/iscessOzetMetinV3.pdf
Parasiz, I. (2006). Entry into business. Bursa: Ezgi Bookstore.
Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. USA: Sage.
Sancak, E. & Demirci, N. (2012). National savings and importance of savings for sustainable growth in Turkiye. The International Journal of Economic and Social Research, 8(2), 159-198.
Tas, H. U. & Eser-Unaldi, U. (2013). The place and importance of geography education in creating saving consciousness (example of Ordu city). International Journal of Social Science, 6(7), 1069-1098.
Uluyol, O. (2011). Türkiye’de ailelerin tasarruf yapma alışkanlıkları ve tasarrufları değerlendirme yöntemleri üzerine bir araştırma. Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(35), 167-179.
Uzunoz, A., Aktepe, V. & Ozagachanli, Z. (2020). Metaphorical perceptions of social studies preservice teachers regarding the savings value. Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University Journal of ISS, 10(1), 36-51.
Yalcin, M. & Erginer, A. (2012). Metaphoric Perception of Principals in Primary Schools. Teacher Education and Instruction, 1(2), 229-256.
Yildirim, A. & Simsek, H. (2006). Qualitative research methods in the social sciences (6th Edition). Ankara: Seckin Publishing.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


