ANALYSIS OF ACADEMIC TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i5.4280Keywords:
total quality management, education sector, quality assessment, higher education instituteAbstract
This study focuses on the overarching principles of quality improvement in an educational institution. Total Quality Management (TQM) is applied in this context because it indicates how this system has been and can be used to improve academic quality. This work is designed for all Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) in Bangladesh, with the exception of individual programs, departments, or services. It is used to assess and evaluate faculty members' interactions with students. Additionally, this research generates data on students' satisfaction with the institutions' varied offerings. Indeed, the research focuses on a variety of student concerns in order to compare how these institutions are now tackling quality issues to the TQM perspective and to identify both the strengths and weaknesses of these institutions' quality work. Structured questionnaires were launched and peer-to-peer interviews were performed for the analysis with moderately a large pool of students at multiple academic institutions. The findings of the result disseminated how a number of quality issues with pupils are resolved so as to develop an academic decision-making process. Finally this study offers sound guidelines and suggestions for guaranteeing effective learning processes in higher education systems.
Article visualizations:
References
Aminuzzaman, S. (2007). Overview of quality assurance in the context of Bangladesh. Paper presented in a workshop, American International University Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Anne M., Lars G., Jakob K. E., Kai K. (2000). Singerie Rapporti Di Ricerca.
Berzinskas, G., Ruzevicius, J. (1996). “Universitetinio mokymo definicija ir funkcija” (Definition and function of higher education”. Proceedings of republican scientific conference, 7-9.
Christopher, L., Jochen., W. (2007). Services Marketing: People, Technology, Strategy. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Chowdhury, I. G. (2004). Foreword. Management Forum 2004, April, 3–4.
Crosby, P. B. (1992). Completeness. Quality for the 21st Century, Dutton, USA.
Dahström, ”Från Data Insamling till Rapport- Att göra en statistik undersökning”, Lund: Studentlitteratur, 1996.
Deming, W. E. (1982). Quality, Productivity and Competitive Position. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge.
Durlabhji, S. G. & Fusilier M. R. (1999). The empowered classroom: Applying TQM to college teaching. Manag. Serv. Qual., 9(2): 110-115.
Feigenbaum, A. V. (1956). “Total quality control”. Harvard Business Review, 34 (6): 93-101.
Gaither, N. (1996). Production and Operations Management. Duxbury Press, Cincinnati, OH.
Fisher, T. (1993). “TQM: a warning for higher education”, Educational Record, Spring, pp. 15-19.
Gordon, G. & Partington, P. (1993). Quality in higher education: overview and update. Briefing Paper 3. Sheffield: University Staff Development Unit, University of Sheffield.
Hackman, J. R. and Wageman, R. (1995). Total quality management: empirical, conceptual and practical ussies. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40 (2): 309-44.
Harris, R. W. (1994). Alien or Ally? TQM, Academic Quality and the New Public Management. Qual. Assur. Edu., 2(3): 33-39
Haque, M. S. (2004). Quality management issues in business education in Bangladesh: A synoptic review based on Canadian and European papers. Management Forum 2004, April.
Juran, J. M. & Gryna, F. M. (Eds) (1988). Quality Control Handbook. 4th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York.
Lawrence, J. J. & McCollough, M. A. (2001). A conceptual framework for guaranteeing higher education. Qual. Assur. Edu., 9(3): 139-152.
Michael, R. K., et al., (1997). A comprehensive model for implementing total quality management in higher education. Benchmark. Qual. Manage. Technol., 4(2): 104120.
Osseo-Asare, E. A. Jr. & Longbottom, D. (2002). The need for education and training in the use of the EFQM model for quality management in UK higher education institutions. Qual. Assur. Edu., 10(1):26-36.
Roffe, I. M. (1998). Conceptual problems of continuous quality improvement and innovation in higher education. Qual. Assur. Higher Edu., 6(2): 74-82.
Rowley, J. (1996). Motivation and academic staff in higher education. Quality Assurance in Education, 4, 11–16.
UNICEF (2000). The International Working Group on Education, Italy.
Witcher, B. J. (1990). Total Marketing: Total Quality and Marketing Concept. The Quarterly Review of Marketing Winter.
World Bank (1995). Priorities and strategies for education. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


