INQUIRY BASED LEARNING ON TEACHING CONTROVERSIAL HISTORICAL ISSUES – AN ACTION RESEARCH WITH PRE‐SERVICE TEACHERS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i9.4452Keywords:
Controversial Historical Issues, collaborative investigation, pre‐service teachers' educationAbstract
Controversial Historical Issues are considered as an historical education topic which usually makes teachers feel uncomfortable to deal with pedagogically. A collaborative investigation is expected to be a suitable approach for teaching this kind of issue. This current research concerns the effects of an educational program for pre‐service teachers in their willingness to teach Controversial Issues through modern collaborative teaching practices. A six‐month program based on the basic principles of Inquiry Based Learning, related to Occupation‐Resistance‐Civil War thematic, has been implemented with fourteen pre‐service teachers. Data qualitative analysis showed that participants get familiarized with strategies and learning tools that help children draw valid conclusions, utilize source practices, and conduct their own enriched narrations about the controversial past. The major benefits and potential difficulties have also been revealed. After all, this training experience strengthens their perceived self‐efficacy since they acknowledge that a collaborative investigation is an effective approach to acquiring historical knowledge based on personal and group‐investigation processes.
Article visualizations:
References
Bacon, K., & Matthews, P. (2014). Inquiry‐based learning with young learners: a
Peirce based model employed to critique a unit of inquiry on maps and mapping. Irish Educational Studies, 33 (4), 351‐365.
Barak, M. & Shakhman, I. (2008). Fostering higher order thinking in science class: Teachers' reflections. Teachers and Teaching, 14 (3), 191‐208.
Barton, K. C., & Levstik, L. S. (2011). Doing history: Investigating with children in elementary
and middle schools (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Van Buschoten, R., Vervenioti, Τ., Voutyra, Ε., Dalkamvoukis, V., Mpada, Κ., (eds.). (2008). Memories and oblivion on Greek Civil war, Athens: Epikentro.
Byford, J., Lennon, S. & Russell, W. (2009). Teaching Controversial Issues in the Social
Studies: A Research Study of High School Teachers, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, 82:4, 165‐170, DOI: 10.3200/TCHS.82.4.165‐170
Cotton, D. (June 2006). Teaching controversial environmental issues: neutrality and
balance in the reality of the classroom. Educational Research, 48 (2), 223‐241.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York: Macmillan Company.
Faulkner, W. (1960). Requiem for a nun. Penguin: London.
Hess, D. (2005). How do teachers' political views influence teaching about controversial
issues? Social Education, 69, 47‐57.
Hess, D. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic value of discussion. New York: Routledge.
Hobsbawm, E. (1994). Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914‐1991, London:
Michael Joseph.
Hoepper, B. (2014). Planning for teaching through critical inquiry. In R. Gilbert & B.
Hoepper, B. (Eds.), Teaching humanities and social sciences: History, geography, economics & citizenship, (5th ed.) (pp. 44‐65). South Melbourne: Cengage Learning Australia.
Iglesias, R., Aceituno, D., & Toledo, M. (2017). Student Teachers' Understandings and
Practices for Teaching "Controversial Issues" in the High School History Curriculum. Procedia ‐ Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2017.02.089.
Kokkinos, G. & Mavroskoufis, D.K. (eds) (2015). Trauma, Controversial Issues, and
Interpretive conflicts in historical education. Athens: Rodon.
Kwan, Y. W., & Wong, A. F. (2015). Effects of the constructivist learning environment on
students' critical thinking ability: Cognitive and motivational variables as mediators. International Journal of Educational Research, 70, 68‐79.
Lechner, N. (2002). Las sombras del mañana. La dimensión subjetiva de la política.
Santiago: LOM.
McNiff, J., Lomax, P. & Whitehead, J. (1996). You and Your Action Research Project, London:
Routledge.
Percoco, J. (2001). Divided, we stand. Teaching about conflict in U.S. History. Portsmouth,
NH: Heinemann.
Piaget, J. (1948). The moral judgment of the child. Free Press.
Van Drie, J., & Van Boxtel, C. (2008). Historical reasoning: Towards a framework for
analyzing students' reasoning about the past. Educational Psychology Review, 20(2), 87‐110.
Villalino, F. E. (2009). Context Based Teaching in Science. 8th Conference of the Philippines
School Overseas. Davao.
Wasserman, J., Francis, D. and Ndou, L., (2008). The teaching of controversial issues in
social science education. Journal of Educational Studies, 6(4), 37‐57.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


