AN INVESTIGATION INTO EFL UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS’ RESEARCH COMPETENCE DEVELOPMENT AT UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN LANGUAGES AND INTERNATIONAL STUDIES, HUE UNIVERSITY, VIETNAM
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i11.4533Paraules clau:
research competence development, EFL undergraduate students, facilitating factorsResum
This study aimed at exploring EFL students’ attitudes towards doing research at the undergraduate level, the perceived practice of research competence and the factors facilitating the development of research competence. The population of the study was EFL undergraduate students studying at University of Foreign Languages and International Studies, Hue University. The sample of the study comprised 120 second-year, third-year and fourth-year students majoring in English Language Teaching and English Language Studies. The data was collected through questionnaires and semi-structured interviews. The results show that EFL students thought that doing research is important to their future career path, but they were not confident to do their own research. In terms of EFL students’ perceived practice of research competence, thinking of a research topic and writing theoretical background posed challenges for EFL students, while using PowerPoint to present their research was the activity, they felt most confident to do. The participants did not show entire support for the role of the library and the faculty in facilitating the research competence development at a high level. These findings imply that the library and the faculty should provide more various databases for students as well as opportunities to be familiar with doing research.
Article visualizations:
Referències
Beckman, M., & Hensel, N. (2009). Making Explicit the Implicit: Defining Undergraduate Research. Council on Undergraduate Research (CUR) Quarterly, 29(4), 40–44.
Biktagirova, G. F., & Valeeva, R. A. (2013). Technological approach to the reflection development of future engineers. In 2013 International Conference on Interactive Collaborative Learning (ICL), (pp. 427-428). IEEE.
Epstein, N., Reimer, M., Gartmeier, M., Fischer, M. R., Berberat, P. O., & Huber, J. (2021). The Munich Research Competence Scale: Research Competence among Doctoral Candidates and Graduates in Medicine Results from the second Wave of the Bavarian Graduate Study in Medicine. Beiträge Zur Hochschulforschung.
Hair, J., Money, A., Samouel, P., Kalafatis, S., Katsikeas, C., Pitt, L., & Jorgensen, J. E. (2001). The role of theory in doctoral research in business: Global perspectives. Doctoral Consortium Abstract.
Indah, R. N., Budhiningrum, A. S., & Afifi, N. (2022). The Research Competence, Critical Thinking Skills and Digital Literacy of Indonesian EFL Students. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 13(2), 315–324.
Ismuratova, S. I., Slambekova, T. S., Kazhimova, K. R., Alimbekova, A. A., & Karimova, R. E. (2018). Model of forming future specialists’ research competence. Revista Espacios, 39(35).
Jamieson, L. M., & Saunders, M. V. (2020). Contextual Framework for Developing Research Competence: Piloting a Validated Classroom Model. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(3), 1–19.
Murdoch-Eaton, D., Drewery, S., Elton, S., Emmerson, C., Marshall, M., Smith, J. A., & Whittle, S. (2010). What do medical students understand by research and research skills? Identifying research opportunities within undergraduate projects. Medical Teacher, 32(3), e152–e160.
Nenty, H. J. (2009). Writing a quantitative research thesis. International Journal of Educational Sciences, 1(1), 19–32.
Niemi, H., & Nevgi, A. (2014). Research studies and active learning promoting professional competences in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 131–142.
Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House Publishers.
Ponomarchuk, P. N. (2009). Contents And Diagnostics Of Research Competence Of Law Students. Right And Education, 11, 11, 80–87.
Rowley, J. (2014). Designing and using research questionnaires. Management Research Review.
Showman, A., Cat, L. A., Cook, J., Holloway, N., & Wittman, T. (2013). Five essential skills for every undergraduate researcher. Council on Undergraduate Research Quarterly, 33(3), 16–21.
Skelton, J. R., & Edwards, S. J. (2000). The function of the discussion section in academic medical writing. Bmj, 320(7244), 1269–1270.
Swindoll, C. R. (2012). Saying it Well: Touching Others with Your Words. Hachette UK.
Tran, N. Q. (2021). EFL students’ awareness and challenges of conducting research: At University of Foreign Languages. Hue University.
van der Linden, W., Bakx, A., Ros, A., Beijaard, D., & Vermeulen, M. (2012). Student teachers’ development of a positive attitude towards research and research knowledge and skills. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 401–419.
Wester, K. L., & Borders, L. D. (2013). Research competencies in counseling: A Delphi study. Journal of Counseling & Development, 92(4), 447–458.
Willison, J., & O’Regan, K. (2007). Commonly known, commonly not known, totally unknown: A framework for students becoming researchers. Higher Education Research and Development, 26(4), 393–409.
Wilmore, M., & Willison, J. (2016). Graduates’ attitudes to research skill development in undergraduate media education. Asia Pacific Media Educator, 26(1), 113–128.
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


