MORAL COMPASS AND UNETHICAL PRACTICES IN ACADEMICS AMONG SECONDARY SCHOOL STUDENTS IN BARINGO COUNTY, KENYA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i11.5083Keywords:
moral compass, unethical practices, academics, values, students, cheatingAbstract
Academic honesty is a critical aspect of an education system as it ensures learners have the necessary knowledge, skills, and competencies. However, there have been reported incidences where learners have engaged in unethical practices. This study sought to establish whether moral compass is related to the enactment of ethical practices in academics among 396 systematic sample of secondary school students aged between 16 to 21 years. Data was analyzed using descriptive and correlational approaches. The results showed that the majority of the respondents had a high moral compass. Also, very few (12%) had never engaged in unethical practices in academics. In addition, moral compass was inverse and significantly related to involvement in unethical behaviours in academics. It was recommended that further studies should be conducted on why there is incongruence between student’s beliefs and values and ethical practices in academics.
Article visualizations:
References
Ahmed, S.S. (2018). Impact of cheating university examination on quality of education in Kenya: A case of UMMA University, Kenya. European Journal of Education Studies, 5(1), 272- 287. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1419300
Anitha, P. & Sundaram, S. (2021). Prevalence, types, and reasons for academic dishonesty among college students. Journal of Studies in Social Sciences and Humanities, 7(1)1-14.
Catacutan, M.R. (2019). Attitudes toward cheating among business students at a private Kenyan university. Journal of International Education in Business, 14 (1), 20-36. https://www.emerald.com/insight/2046-469X.
Dahl, A. & Waltzer, T. (2018). Moral disengagement as a psychological construct. American Journal of Psychology, 131(2), 240-246. https://doi.org/10.5406/amerjpsyc.131.2.0240
Feday, S.W. (2017). Academic dishonesty in Ethiopian higher education and its implication for corruption. Beijing Law Review, 8, 10-20. https://doi.org/10.4236/blr.2017.81002
Festinger, L. (1957). A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Galloway, M.K. (2012), Academic dishonesty in advantaged high schools: prevalence, justification, and possibilities for change. Ethics and Behavior, 22(5), 378-399. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.679143
Ives, B. (2020). Your students are cheating more than you think they are. Why? Educational Research: Theory and Practice, 31(1)46-53. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1250265
Kam. C.C.S., Hue, M.T. & Cheung, H.Y. (2018). Academic dishonesty among Hong Kong secondary school students: application of theory of planned behavior. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 38(7), 945- 963. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1454588
Koscielnak, M. & Bojanowska, A. (2019). The role of Personal values and student achievement in academic dishonesty. Frontiers in Psychology, 10: 1887. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01887
Lennick, D. & Kiel, F. (2005). Moral intelligence: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson education.
Midgley, C. & Anderman, E.M. (2004). Changes in self-reported academic dishonesty across the transition from middle school to high school. Contemporary Educational Psychology.29, 499-517. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2004.02.002
Midgley, C., Maehr, M.L., Hruda, L.Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L., Freeman, K.E, …Urdan, T. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales. The University of Michigan. https://doi.org/312672586
Mugala, A., Masaiti, G. & Mwila, K. (2022). Unpacking academic corruption in Zambia higher education: forms, causes and mitigation measures. Creative Education, 13(1), 55-74. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.131004
Pulfrey, C., Durussel, K., & Butera, F. (2018). The good cheat: Benevolence and the justification of collective cheating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 764-784. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000247
Segalo, L., & Rambuda, A.M. (2018). South African public school teachers’ views on right to discipline learners. South African Journal of Education, 38(2), 1-7. https://doi.org.10.15700/saje.v38n2a1448.
Sidi, Y., Blau, I., & Eshet‐Alkalai, Y. (2019). How is the ethical dissonance index affected by technology, academic dishonesty type and individual differences?. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(6), 3300-3314. https://10.1111/bjet.12735
Wamalwa, E.M.W., Okoth, J.M. & Ochanda, D. (2020). Factors contributing to academic dishonesty in Kenya Medical Training College Western Kenya. European Journal of Medical and Health Sciences, 2(4)1-6. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejmed.2020.2.4.407
Wankel, C., Stachowicz-Stanusch, A. & Tamtana, J.S. (2011). The impact of the national culture dimension and corruption on students’ moral competencies- research results. Journal of International Management, 3(2), 19-45. http://joim.pl/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/3-2-2.
Wolhuter, C.X., & Van der Walt, J.L. (2020). Indiscipline in South African schools: the parental/ community perspective. KOERS- Bulletin for Christian Scholarship, 85(1),
-11. https://doi.org/10.19108/koers.85.1.2436
Yahya, A.H. & Sukmayadi, V. (2020). A review of Cognitive dissonance theory and its relevance to current social issues. MIMBAR, 36(2),
-488. https://doi.org/10.29313/mimbar.v36i2.6652
Yang, Y., Guo, Z., Wu, J. & Kou, Y. (2020). Self-compassion relates to reduced unethical behavior through lowered moral disengagement. Mindfulness, 11,
-1432. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-020-01354-1
Yamane, T. (1967). Statistics: An introductory analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Harper and Row
Yu, H., Glanzer, P.L, Johnson, B.R., Shiram R., and Moore B. (2018). Why college students cheat: A conceptual model of five factors. The Review of Higher Education, 41(4), 549-576. https://doi.org/10.1353/rhe.2018.0025.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


