EDUCATION STAKEHOLDERS' VIEWS ON TEACHER’S SCRUB

Authors

  • Ali Rıza Erdem Pamukkale University, Education Faculty, Denizli, Turkey orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-9529
  • Vildan Gider Ministry of Education, Aydın, Turkey orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-1130

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i5.5308

Keywords:

teacher, school principal, education union representative, teacher's scrub, opinion

Abstract

Teacher's scrub has become an important issue that attracts the attention of education stakeholders. Teacher’s scrub is attributed meanings such as authority, respect, and professionalism. However, these meanings may vary according to stakeholders. It is important to reveal the perspectives of educational stakeholders on teacher’s scrub to shed light on the issue. It is important to understand the different perspectives on teacher’s scrub to establish healthier relationships among educational stakeholders. This study aims to determine the views of educational stakeholders on teacher’s scrub. A case study design was used in this study. The study group consisted of 14 teachers, 6 school administrators, and 6 provincial representatives of education unions working at different education levels in Aydın province. The participants were asked the questions in the semi-structured "interview form about teacher’s scrub" prepared by the researchers and the data obtained were analyzed by content analysis. According to the findings of the study, the views of the participants on teacher’s scrub reveal different perspectives.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biographies

  • Ali Rıza Erdem, Pamukkale University, Education Faculty, Denizli, Turkey orcid.org/0000-0001-9704-9529

    Dr. Ali Rıza Erdem works at Education Faculty, Pamukkale University as a professor. He has written scientific books and articles on strategic planning at a non-profit organization, learning organizations, higher education, efficiency and productivity education & teaching.

  • Vildan Gider, Ministry of Education, Aydın, Turkey orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-1130

    PhD student Vildan Gider works at the Ministry of National Education as a teacher. She is preparing his doctoral thesis in the field of educational administration. She has written articles on metaphor, creativity, and effectiveness in education management.

References

Başaran, S. T. and Aksu, M. (2007). Anatolian teacher high schools: Advantages, limitations and suggestions for improvement. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 40(1), 157-179.

Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E., Karadeniz, Ş. and Demirel, F. (2009). Scientific Research Methods (8th edition). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.

Brown, A. P. (2008). A review of the literature on case study research. Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education, 1(1), 1-13.

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative research methods: Qualitative research and research design according to five approaches. (Edited by Miraç Aydın, Mesut Bütün and Selçuk Beşir Demir). Ankara: Siyasal Bookstore.

Çelikten, M., Şanal, M., & Yeni, Y. (2005). Teaching profession and its characteristics. Erciyes University Social Journal of the Institute of Sciences, 19(2), 207-237.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage Publications.

Hatipoğlu, A., & Kavas, E. (2016). The effect of parent approaches on teacher performance. Human and Social Sciences Journal of Research, 5(4), 1012-1034.

Karaman, M., Acar, A., Kılıç, O., Buluş, U., & Erdoğan, Ö. (2013). Teachers working in Sakarya province 'the status and prestige of the teaching profession'. Sakarya University Publications, 95, 104-110.

Marshall, C., & Rossman, B. G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. Sage Publications.

Merriam, S. B. (2013). A guide to qualitative research, design and practice. (Trans. Ed. S. Turan). Nobel Publishing.

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Özsoy, G., Özsoy, S., Özkara, Y., & Memiş, A. D. (2010). Preference of prospective teachers for teaching profession factors that are effective in their decision making. İlköğretim Online, 9(3), 910-921.

Öztürk, N. (2005). The role of education in economic development. Socioeconomics, 1(1), 27-44.

Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (M. Bütün and S. B. Demir, trans.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. Integrating theory and practice. (Fourth Edition). Sage Publications.

Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. Sage Publications.

Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage Publications.

Türk, M., & Çelik, O. (2013). Teachers' views on some of the problems they face related to their professions evaluation. VI. Social Sciences Education Congress, Proceedings, (Eds: İ. H. Demircioğlu, R. Çiçek, S. Kaymakçı, E. Demircioğlu & İ. Genç), 76-84.

Yalçın, S. (2016). Investigation of classroom teachers' professional satisfaction/dissatisfaction levels in terms of some variables. Erzincan University Journal of Institute of Social Sciences, 9(1): 1-16.

Yıldırım, A and Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (8th edition). Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.

Yin, R. K. (2012). Applications of case study research. Sage Publications.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-05

Issue

Vol. 11 No. 5 (2024)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).