NURTURING AND PROMOTING LEARNERS’ RETENTION IN ASTROPHYSICS USING VIDEO-BASED MULTIMEDIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i10.5562Nøgleord:
astrophysics, gender, retention, rural students, urban students, video-based multimediaResumé
Learners’ retention of concepts in physics has been a crucial fact in students’ achievement needs competencies. Therefore, innovative and friendly strategies to develop learners’ retention of physics have been a matter of concern over the years. This study, therefore, strives to investigate the power of video-based multimedia (VBM) to nurture and promote learners’ retention in astrophysics in selected schools in Rwanda. 294 students were purposively selected for the scientific option with physics as a major subject in Rutsiro and Rubavu districts. The astrophysics achievement test with Cronbach alpha 0.87 was used to collect data within the pre/post-test non-equivalent control group quasi-experiment research design. The output revealed that the VBM intervention group outperformed the usual teaching control group. The results also showed that females retained marginally more than males in VBM intervention classes, and urban students retained better than their rural counterparts. Based on the output of this study, we concluded that credit goes to VBM as a friendly and innovative teaching method. Hence, we recommend using VBM in teaching and learning physics with special attention in rural-based schools.
Article visualizations:
Referencer
Abdulrahaman, M., Faruk, N., Oloyede, A., Bakinde, N. S., Olawoyin, L., Mejabi, O., . . . Azeeze, A. (2020, November). Multimedia tools in the teaching and learning processes: A systematic review. Heliyon, 6(11). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e05312
Acker, S., & Oatley, K. (1993). Gender issues in education for science and technology: current situation and prospects for change Canadian Journal of Education. Revue canadienne de l'éducation, 255-272. https://doi.org/10.2307/1495386
Adonu, C. J., Nwagbo, C. R., Christian, S., & Okeke, C. (2021). Improving students' achievement and retention in biology using flipped classroom and PowerPoint instructional approaches: implication for physics teaching. International Journal of Psychosocial Rehabilitation, 25(2). http://bitly.ws/CoMr
Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021, May). Teaching and assessment methods: STEM teachers’ perceptions and implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10882
Alokan, F. B., & Arijesuyo, A. E. (2013, September ). Rural and Urban Differential in Student’s Academic Performance among Secondary School Students In Ondo State, Nigeria. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p213
Anthony, A., & Anka, S. S. (2020). Effects of two modes of computer-assisted instruction on pupils' achievement and retention in English language spelling in Niger state- Nigeria. International Journal of Innovative Research in Computer Science & Technology, 8(3), 231-241. https://doi.org/10.21276/ijircst.2020.8.3.35
Avery, L. M. (2013). Rural science education: valuing local Knowledge. Theory into Practice, 52(1), 28-35. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2013.743769
Bayraktara, D. M., Cosgunb, V., & Altanc, T. (2019). Cognitive load in multimedia learning environments: A systematic review. Computers & Education, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103618
Bizimana, E., Mutangana, D., & Mwesigye, A. (2022, November). Fostering Students' Retention in Photosynthesis Using Concept Mapping and Cooperative Mastery Learning Instructional Strategies. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 103-116.:https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.11.1.107
Bull, P. H. (2013). Cognitive constructivist theory of multimedia: designing teacher-made interactive digital. Creative Education, 4(9), 614-619. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.49088
Casselman, M. D., Eichler, J. F., & Atit, K. (2021). Advancing multimedia learning for science: Comparing the effect of virtual versus physical models on student learning about stereochemistry. Science Education, 1285-1314. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21675
Castro, S. V., Holgado, A. G., Gómez, M. C., & Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Multimedia analysis of Spanish female role models in science, technology, engineering and mathematics. Sustainability, 13, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212612
Chen, Y.-H. (2012). Cognitive diagnosis of mathematics performance between rural and urban students in Taiwan. Assessment in education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 19(2), 193-209. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2011.560562
Dousay, T. A., & Trujillo, N. P. (2018). An examination of gender and situational interest in multimedia learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12610
Dusen, B. V., & Nissen, J. (2020). Equity in College Physics Student Learning: A Critical Quantitative Intersectionality Investigation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21584
GMO. (2019). The State of gender equality in Rwanda, from transition to transformation. Gender Monitoring Office-Rwanda. http://bitly.ws/CoNa
Harris, R. S., & Hodges, C. B. (2018). STEM education in rural schools: implications of untapped potential. National Youth Advocacy and Resilience Journal. https://doi.org/10.20429/nyarj.2018.030102
Heo, M., & Toomey, N. (2020). Learning with multimedia: The effects of gender, type of multimedia learning resources, and spatial ability. Computers & Education, 146. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103747
Ismail, M. Z., Mansor, A. N., Iksan, Z. H., & Mamad, N. (2019). The impact of using stem video in teaching on students’ learning engagement in Malaysia. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 159-165. http://bitly.ws/CoND
Jia, C., Yang, T., Qian, Y., & Wu, X. (2020). The gender differences in science achievement, interest, habit, and creativity. Science Education International, 31(2), 195-202. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v31.i2.9
Kahle, J. B., Parker, L. H., Rennie, L. J., & Riley, D. (2010). Gender differences in science education: building a model. Educational Psychologist, 28(4), 379-404. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2804_6
Khalaf, B. K., & Zin, Z. B. (2018). Traditional and inquiry-based learning pedagogy: A systematic critical review. International Journal of Instruction, 11(4), 545-564. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11434a
Khishfe, R. (2020). Retention of acquired argumentation skills and nature of science conceptions. International Journal of Science Education, 42(13), 2181-2204. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1814444
Kormos, E., & Wisdom, K. (2021). Rural Schools and the Digital Divide: Technology in the Learning Experience and Challenges to Integration. Theory & Practice in Rural Education, 11(1), 25-39. https://doi.org/10.3776/tpre.2021.v11n1
Lindner, M. A., Schult, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2020). A multimedia effect for multiple-choice and constructed-response test items. Journal of Educational Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/edu00006461
Makarova, E., Aeschlimann, B., & Herzog, W. (2019, July ). The gender gap in STEM fields: the impact of the gender stereotype of math and science on secondary students' career aspirations. Frontiers Education. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00060
Margot, K. C., & Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ perception of STEM integration and education: a systematic literature review. International Journal of STEM Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2
Mayer, R. (2014). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. Mayer, The Cambridge handbook of multimedia learning (pp. 43-71). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139547369.005
McGuire, C. (2018). Transforming traditional teaching practices with 21st century skills in K-12 classrooms. Culminating Projects in Information Media, 16. http://bitly.ws/CoP9
Mineduc. (2008). Girls' education policy. Ministry of Education-Rwanda. http://bitly.ws/CoPh
Morris, J., Slater, E., Fitzgerald, M. T., Lummis, G. W., & Etten, E. v. (2021). Using local rural knowledge to enhance STEM learning for gifted and talented students in Australia. Research in Science Education, 51, 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-019-9823-2
Mukuka, A., Mutarutinya, V., & Balimuttajjo, S. (2019). Exploring the barriers to effective cooperative learning implementation in school mathematics classroom. Problem of Education in the 21st century, 77(6), 745-757. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/19.77.745
Munna, A. S., & Kalam, M. A. (2021). Teaching and learning process to enhance teaching effectiveness: a literature review. International Journal of Humanities and Innovation, 4(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v4i1.102
Ndihokubwayo, K., Uwamahoro, J., & Ndayambaje, I. (2020). Effectiveness of PhET simulations and YouTube videos to improve the learning of optics in Rwandan secondary schools. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 24(2), 253-265. https://doi.org/10.1080/18117295.2020.1818042
Nyirahabimana, P., Minani, E., Nduwingoma, M., & Kemeza, I. (2022). Instructors and Students’ Practices and Behaviours during a Quantum Physics class at the University of Rwanda: Exploring the Usage of Multimedia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(9), 309-326. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.9.18
Oyelekan, O. S., Igbokwe, E. F., & Olorundare, A. S. (2017). Science teachers’ utilisation of innovative strategies for teaching senior school science in Ilorin, Nigeria. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 5(2), 49-65. http://bitly.ws/CoPu
Palermo, M., Kelly, A. M., & Krakehl, R. (2021). Physics teacher retention, migration, and attrition. Journal of Science Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046560X.2021.1946638
Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino, A. R. (2019, November ). The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, 95(5). https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093
Petrus, R. M. (2018). A comparison of teachers’ and students’ perceptions of the factors contributing to poor performance in physical sciences: A case of South Africa. Turkish Science Education, 15(4), 93-103. https://doi.org/10.12973/tused.10248a)
Pmp, N. M. (2019, April ). 21st century teaching: integrating innovation in a traditional classroom. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3375460
Puente, S. M., & Kroesen, G. M. (2020). Facilitating retention and transfer of physics concepts with challenging assignments in design-based learning projects. Open Journal of Social Sciences, 18(12), 366-387. https://doi.org/10.4236/jss.2020.812030
REB. (2015). Advanced Level Physics Syllabus. Rwanda Education Board. http://bitly.ws/CoPy
Saw, G. K., & Agger, C. A. (2021). STEM Pathways of Rural and Small-Town Students: Opportunities to Learn, Aspirations, Preparation, and College Enrollment. Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X211027528
Serrano, M. J., & Rodríguez, J. M. (2020). Interest in STEM disciplines and teaching methodologies. Perception of secondary school students and preservice teachers. Educar 2020, 56(2), 369-386. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/educar.1065
Seyranian, V., Madva, A., Duong, N., Abramzon, N., Tibbetts, Y., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2018). The longitudinal effects of STEM identity and gender on flourishing and achievement in college physics. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 40-47. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0137-0
Stoet, G., & Geary, D. C. (2018). The Gender-Equality Paradox in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Education. Psychological Science. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617741719
Taber, K. S. (2018). The Use of Cronbach’s Alpha When Developing and Reporting Research Instruments in Science Education. Research in Science Education, 48, 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Tuckman, B. W. (1975). Measuring Educational Outcomes: Fundamentals Of Testing. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt P. http://bitly.ws/CoRr
Tugirinshuti, G. J., Mugabo, L. R., & Banuza, A. (2021). Integrating Video-Based Multimedia in Teaching Physics in Context of Covid-19 in Rwandan Secondary Schools. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(12), 49-63. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.12.4
Wang, P.-Y. (2013). Examining the Digital Divide between Rural and Urban Schools: Technology Availability, Teachers’ Integration Level and Students’ Perception. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 2(2), 127-139. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v2n2p127
White, J. L., & Massiha, G. (2016). The Retention of women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics: A framework for persistence. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 5(1), 1-8. http://bitly.ws/CoRB
Wolf, S., McCoy, D. C., & Godfrey, E. B. (2016, June). Barriers to school attendance and gender inequality: empirical evidence from a sample of Ghanaian school children. Research in Comparative and International Education, 11(2), 178 –193. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499916632424
Zendler, A., Seitz, C., & Klaudt, D. (2018). Instructional methods in STEM education: A cross-contextual study. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(7), 2969-2986. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/91482
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


