ASSESSING THE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COMPONENT OF EARLY LANGUAGE LITERACY AND NUMERACY: A PROGRAM EVALUATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i11.5728کلمات کلیدی:
literacy, numeracy, learning action cell, continuous professional developmentچکیده
This study aimed to evaluate the implementation of the ELLN program focusing on the third phase which was the Learning Action Cells (LACs) in one of the central schools in Digos City. The qualitative research design was employed in the study using an in-depth interview guide for monitoring evaluation to 18 teachers in the selected school. Results showed that all Kinder-Grade 3 teachers attended and benefited on the ELLN training program through the LAC session. Further, findings revealed factors that lead to the effective and efficient ELLN implementation such as conducting an observation to all Kinder-Grade 3 teachers, applying approaches and strategies in class, employing explicit teaching, and indulging a program for intermediate teachers in sustaining literacy and numeracy development. It was concluded that early grade teachers strengthened their skills in teaching and assessing through training and mentoring. Finally, it was recommended that professional development component in ELLN will be improved its effective delivery if time consciousness, resource provision, and mechanism for sustainability of the LAC session will be given more attention.
Article visualizations:
مراجع
Busljeta, R. (2013). Effective use of teaching and learning resources. Czech-Polish Historical and Pedagogical Journal, 5/2, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.2478/cphpj-2013-0014
Creswell, J.W., Klassen, A.C., Plano Clark, V.L., & Smith, K.C. (2011). Best practices for mixed methods research in the health sciences. Behavioral and Social Sciences Research. Retrieved from https://obssr.od.nih.gov/sites/obssr/files/Best_Practices_for_Mixed_Methods_Research.pdf
Department of Education Order 42, s. 2017. National adoption and implementation of the Philippine professional standards for teachers | Department of Education. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2017/08/11/do-42-s-2017-national-adoption-and-implementation-of-the-philippine-professional-standards-for-teachers/
Department of Education Order 2, s. 2015. Guidelines on the establishment and implementation of the results-based performance management system (RPMS) in the department of education. Retrieved from https://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/02/06/do-2-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-establishment-and-implementation-of-the-results-based-performance-management-system-rpms-in-the-department-of-education/
Department of Education Order No. 12 s. 2015. Guidelines on the early language, literacy, and numeracy program: professional development component. Retrieved from http://www.deped.gov.ph/2015/04/10/do-12-s-2015-guidelines-on-the-early-language-literacy-and-numeracy-program-professional-development-component/
Department of Education and Skills (2010). A Draft National Plan to Improve Literacy and Numeracy in Schools. Better Literacy and Numeracy for Children and Young People. St Mac Dara's Community College, Templeogue, Dublin 6
Gempes, G. & Ochada, N. (2018). The realities of maintenance and other operating expenses (MOOE) allocation in basic education system: unheard voices of public-school teachers. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 7 (4). Retrieved from https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/apr2018/The-Realities-Of-Maintenance-And-Other-Operating-Expenses-mooe-Allocation-In-Basic-Education-System-Unheard-Voices-Of-Public-School-Teachers.pdf
Gentry, R., Sallie, A. P., & Sanders, C. A. (2013). Differentiated instructional strategies to accommodate students with varying needs and learning styles. ERIC. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED545458.pdf
Gove, A., & Wetterberg, A. (2011). The early grade reading assessment: applications and interventions to improve basic literacy. https://doi.org/10.3768/rtipress.2011.bk.0007.1109
Greenhill, V. (2010). 21st century knowledge and skills in educator preparation. ERIC. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED519336.pdf
Guskey, T. (2013). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/135406002100000512
Lawson, M. A., & Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Review of Educational Research, 83(3), 432–479. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654313480891.
Meeks, L., Kemp, C., & Stephenson, J. (2014). Standards in Literacy and Numeracy: Contributing factors. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(7). https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2014v39n7.
National Institute for Education and Development (2011). An investigation of literacy and numeracy skills at lower primary phase in Namibian schools. Resource Development and Research. NIED Okahandja. Retrieved from https://www.nied.edu.na/assets/documents/03Research/01LiteracyandNumeracy/RE-LI_National-Investigation_2012.pdf
Nilsen, T., & Gustafsson, J. (2016). Teacher Quality, Instructional Quality and Student Outcomes: Relationships across Countries, Cohorts and Time. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, 2. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED588361.pdf
O’Leary, M. (2013). Classroom Observation: A guide to the effective observation of teaching and learning. Retrieved from http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BB15343985
Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A. (2015). purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Policy Ment Health, 42, 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Pereira, C. M., & Gomes, J. F. (2012). The strength of human resource practices and transformational leadership: impact on organizational performance. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 23(20), 4301–4318. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2012.667434
Putman, V. L., & Paulus, P. B. (2009). Brainstorming, brainstorming rules and decision making. Journal of Creative Behaviour, 43(1), 23-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2009.tb01304.x
Roselli, N. (2016). Collaborative learning: Theoretical foundations and applicable strategies to university. Propósitos y Representaciones, 4(1), 219-280. http://dx.doi.org/10.20511/pyr2016.v4n1.90
Rochon, M. (2017). Creative evaluation methods. Retrieved January 12, 2019 from https://bizfluent.com/info-8481757-creative-evaluation-methods.html
Rupley, W. H., Blair, T. R., & Nichols, W. D. (2009). Effective Reading instruction for Struggling readers: The role of Direct/Explicit Teaching. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(2–3), 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560802683523
Sood, A. (2018). Time management. Retrieved from https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/time- management-123699052/123699052
Stosic, L. (2015). The importance of educational technology in teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science Engineering and Education, 3(1), 111–114. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2015-3-1-111-114
Wegner, C., Minnaert, L. & Strehlke, F. (2013). The importance of learning strategies and how the project ‘Kolumbus-Kids’ promotes them successfully. European Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 1(3), 138-143. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1108220.pdf
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
