IMPACT OF MANIPULATIVE-BASED INSTRUCTION ON STUDENTS’ CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING OF BASIC GEOMETRY IN A SECONDARY SCHOOL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i11.6409کلمات کلیدی:
manipulative-based instruction, basic geometry, quasi-experimental design, grade 7 studentsچکیده
This research assessed the impact of manipulative-based instruction on students’ understanding of basic geometry using a quasi-experimental design with 84 Grade 7 students at a public high school in Cebu, Philippines, during the school year 2025-2026. The participants were divided into two groups: 42 participants in the experimental group were taught using manipulative-based instruction, while 42 participants in the control group were taught traditionally. Pretest and posttest scores were collected and analyzed using mean, standard deviation, paired t-test and t-test for independent samples. Results showed that both groups had fairly satisfactory performance during the pretest. During the posttest, the control group had satisfactory performance, while the experimental group had very satisfactory performance. Moreover, both groups showed a significant difference between the pretest and posttest scores of the participants. On the other hand, there was a significant mean gain difference on the pretest and posttest scores between the two groups, which indicates that the experimental group performs better than the control group. This means manipulative-based instruction helped students understand geometry concepts better than the traditional method. The study concludes that using manipulatives is an effective way to teach geometry because it gives students concrete and hands-on experiences with abstract ideas. It is recommended that teachers use manipulative-based strategies in teaching geometry and other math topics to improve students’ learning and participation.
Article visualizations:
مراجع
Ahmad, S., & Siller, H.-S. (2024). Investigating the effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement: The role of concrete and virtual manipulatives for diverse achievement level groups. Journal on Mathematics Education, 15(3), 979–1002. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v15i3.pp979-1002
Alatlı, B. K. (2020). Investigation of factors associated with science literacy performance of students by hierarchical linear modeling: PISA 2015 comparison of Turkey and Singapore. Education and Science, 45(202), 17-49. https://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2020.8188
Bourne, J., & Winstone, N. (2021). Empowering students’ voices: the use of activity-oriented focus groups in higher education research. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 44(4), 352-365. https://doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2020.1777964
Freeman, S., Eddy, S. L., McDonough, M., Smith, M. K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences, 111(23), 8410-8415, https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319030111
Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2017). 10 Mindframes for Visible Learning: Teaching for Success (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315206387
Hulley S, Cummings SR, Browner WS, Grady DG, Newman TB (Ed.) (2013). Designing Clinical Research (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins. Retrieved from https://apn.lwwhealthlibrary.com/book.aspx?bookid=1278
Luzano, J. F. P. (2024). Understanding the disparities in PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) implementation in the Philippines: An integrative review in the mathematics education context. International Journal of Academic and Applied Research, 8(5), 122–128. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/49sukhbd
Maciejewski, M. L. (2018). Quasi-experimental design. Biostatistics & Epidemiology, 4(1), 38–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/24709360.2018.1477468
Moyer-Packenham, P. S. & Westenskow, A. (2013). Effects of Virtual Manipulatives on Student Achievement and Mathematics Learning. International Journal of Virtual and Personal Learning Environments (IJVPLE), 4(3), 35-50. https://doi.org/10.4018/jvple.2013070103
Peconcillo Jr, L. B., Peteros, E. D., Mamites, I. O., Sanchez, D. T., & Suson, R. L. (2020). Structuring Determinants to Level Up Students' Performance. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(4), 638-651. DOI: 10.18488/journal.61.2020.84.638.651. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1279528
Peteros, E. D. (2024). Impact of pre-service teachers’ self-regulation and self-efficacy on their mathematics performance in blended learning. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 18(2), 526-534. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v18i2.21074
Peteros, E. D., Benemerito, G. N., Peconcillo Jr, L. B., de Vera, J. V., & Alcantara, G. A. (2022). Investigating the attitudes and performance of retained students in mathematics: A case of Cebu, Philippines. Journal of Positive School Psychology, 6(3), 8692-8704. Retrieved from https://journalppw.com/index.php/jpsp/article/view/5180
Ponte, R., Viseu, F., Neto, T. B., & Aires, A. P. (2023, June). Revisiting manipulatives in the learning of geometric figures. In Frontiers in Education (Vol. 8, p. 1217680). Frontiers Media SA. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/2m7kr9rk
Sharma, P. (2021). Importance and application of mathematics in everyday life. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology, 9(11), 868-879. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.38869
Silangan, C. S., Mocsir, R. M., Regner, R. M., & Peteros, E. D. (2023). Predictive analysis on students’ academic performance in mathematics. Global Journal of Educational Studies, 9(1), 17-30. https://doi.org/10.5296/gjes.v9i1.21040
Siller, H. S., & Ahmad, S. (2024). The effect of concrete and virtual manipulative blended instruction on mathematical achievement for elementary school students. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 24(2), 229-266. Retrieved from https://tinyurl.com/3rhn2akk
Sokolowski, A. (2021). Parametrization of Projectile Motion. In Understanding Physics Using Mathematical Reasoning: A Modeling Approach for Practitioners and Researchers (pp. 101-126). Cham: Springer International Publishing. Retrieved from https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-80205-9
Tessema, G., Michael, K., & Areaya, S. (2024). Realist Hands-On Learning Approach and Its Contributions to Learners' Conceptual Understanding and Problem-Solving Skills on Solid Geometry. Pedagogical Research, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/14096
Trust, T., Whalen, J., & Mouza, C. (2023). Editorial: ChatGPT: Challenges, Opportunities, and Implications for Teacher Education. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 1-23. Waynesville, NC, USA: Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education. Retrieved November 27, 2025, from https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/222408/
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


