MOODLE AS A POTENTIAL ONLINE PLATFORM USED IN THE FLIPPED CLASSROOMS IN THE VIETNAMESE EFL TEACHING CONTEXT

Autors/ores

  • Nguyen Huu Anh Vuong University of Foreign Language Studies The University of Danang, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i3.4710

Paraules clau:

flipped classroom, EFL, MOODLE, online platform, Vietnam

Resum

Flipped classrooms started to be adopted in the Vietnamese EFL teaching context a few years ago. Educational technology plays a crucial role in the implementation of this teaching model. Hence, choosing a suitable online platform for these classes is a critical decision for English teachers. The current study attempted to investigate Vietnamese students’ perceptions of MOODLE as the online platform used in two flipped English grammar classes. Sixty-two students from a state university in Vietnam were recruited for this research. The study employed a mixed-methods research design to address the research question. Both quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a questionnaire designed based on Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) and semi-structured interviews. The data analysis revealed that the students had positive perceptions of MOODLE in terms of system characteristics, material characteristics, perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, attitude toward use, and behavioural intention. Accordingly, this learning management system (LMS) could be seen as a potential online platform in flipped classrooms for Vietnamese students.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Biografia de l'autor/a

  • Nguyen Huu Anh Vuong, University of Foreign Language Studies The University of Danang, Vietnam
    Dr. Nguyen Huu Anh Vuong is currently a lecturer at University of Foreign Language Studies - The University of Danang, Viet Nam, where he teaches EFL courses. His main areas of interest include linguistics, CALL, language teaching methodology and EFL teacher development.

Referències

Agyei, C., & Razi, Ö. (2022). The effect of extended UTAUT model on EFLs’ adaptation to flipped classroom. Education and Information Technologies, 27(2), 1865–1882.

Baker, J. W. (2000). The “Classroom Flip”: Using web course management tools to become the guide by the side. In J. A. Chambers (Ed.), Proceedings of the 11 th International Conference on College Teaching and Learning (pp. 9–17). Florida Community College at Jacksonville.

Bergmann, J., & Sams, A. (2012). Flip your classroom: Reach every student in every class every day. Eugene: ISTE.

Bishop, J., & Verleger, M. A. (2013). The Flipped Classroom: A Survey of the Research. 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition.

Chatzoglou, P. D., Sarigiannidis, L., Vraimaki, E., & Diamantidis, A. (2009). Investigating Greek employees’ intention to use web-based training. Computers & Education, 53(3), 877–889.

Chen, L. L. (2016). Impacts of flipped classroom in high school health education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 44(4), 411 –420.

Cormier, C., & Voisard, B. (2018). Flipped classroom in Organic chemistry has significant effect on students’ grades. Frontiers in ICT, 4, 1–15.

Creswell, J. W., & Plano-Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications.

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1002.

Egbert, J., Herman, D., & Lee, H. (2015). Flipped instruction in English language teacher education: A design-based study in a complex, open-ended learning environment. TESL-EJ, 19(2), 1–23.

Fatemeh, S., & Saman, E. (2021). Exploring EFL learners’ inferential reading comprehension skills through a flipped classroom. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 16(1), 1–18.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

Galway, L. P., Corbett, K. K., Takaro, T. K., Tairyan, K., & Frank, E. (2014). A novel integration of online and flipped classroom instructional models in public health higher education. BMC Medical Education, 14(1), 1–9.

Hung, H.-T. (2015). Flipping the classroom for English language learners to foster active learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(1), 81–96.

Lopes, A. P., & Soares, F. (2018). Perception and performance in a flipped Financial Mathematics classroom. The International Journal of Management Education, 16, 105–113.

Machado, C., & Thompson, K. (2005). The adoption of open sources within higher education in Europe and a dissemination case study. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 6(1), 34–51.

Marek, M. W., & Wu, P.-H. N. (2012). Selecting CMC systems for EFL Instruction: Can standard social media platforms succeed? Proceedings of World Conference on Educational Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunications 2012, 967–972.

Motameni, R. (2018). The combined impact of the flipped classroom, collaborative learning, on students’ learning of key Marketing concepts. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 15(3), 1–18.

Mushi, D. R. (2013). Using Moodle to Provide Added Value in the Teaching of a Software Development Course. Lappeenranta University of Technology.

Pempek, T. A., Yermolayeva, Y. A., & Calvert, S. L. (2009). College students’ social networking experiences on Facebook. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 30(3), 227–238.

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

Qader, R. O., & Arslan, F. Y. (2019). The effect of flipped classroom instruction in writing: A case study with Iraqi EFL learners. Teaching English with Technology, 19(1), 36–55.

Roohani, A., & Shafiee Rad, H. (2022). Effectiveness of hybrid-flipped classroom in improving EFL learners’ argumentative writing skill. TEFLIN Journal, 33(2), 349–366.

Staker, H., & Horn, M. B. (2012). Classifying K-12 blended learning. San Mateo: Innosight Institute, Inc.

Šumak, B., Heričko, M., Pušnik, M., & Polančič, G. (2011). Factors affecting acceptance and use of Moodle: An empirical study based on TAM. Electrical Engineering, 35, 91–100.

Tran, T. T. Q. (2017). Students’ perceptions of flipped model on Facebook for educational purposes. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7(3), 7–14.

Tucker, B. (2012). The flipped classroom. Educ Next, 12(1), 1–4.

Vaezi, R., Vaezi, R., & Lotfi, A. (2019). Investigating listening comprehension through flipped classroom approach: Does authenticity matter? CALL-EJ, 20(1), 178–208.

Vaiciuniene, V., & Gedviliene, G. (2008). Students learning experience in the integrated information literacy course constructed in virtual learning environment. Informatics in Education, 7(1), 127–142.

Venkatesh, V. (2000). Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 342–365.

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Decision Science, 39(2), 273–312.

Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.

Yang, C. C. R. (2017). An investigation of the use of the ‘Flipped classroom’ pedagogy in secondary English language classrooms. Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, 16, 1–20.

Zainuddin, Z., & Halili, S. H. (2016). Flipped classroom research and trends from different fields of study. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 17(3), 1–28.

Zou, D. (2020). Gamified flipped EFL classroom for primary education: Student and teacher perceptions. Journal of Computers in Education, 7(2), 213–228.

Descàrregues

Publicat

2023-03-07

Número

Vol. 10 Núm. 3 (2023)

Secció

Articles

Llicència

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).