AN INVESTIGATION ON ONLINE COMPONENTS OF THE BACHELOR OF EDUCATION HONOURS IN SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION DEGREE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i12.5729Paraules clau:
online components, the bachelor of education honours in special needs education degreeResum
The Department of Special Needs Education, part of the Faculty of Education at the Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL), offers the Bachelor of Education Honours in Special Needs Education degree. This program differs from other bachelor’s degree programs as most activities are conducted online. The study aims to identify the current situation, explore the challenges faced by students and lecturers, and propose improvements for online activities in the program. The study follows a pragmatic philosophical worldview and employs a mixed-methods research approach with a convergent design. Data was collected through questionnaires (49 students and 8 lecturers), interview schedules (10 students and 4 lecturers), and document analysis. The program spans four years and requires 120 credits, with assessments consisting of continuous assessment (CA) and a final examination. Findings indicate that most students were satisfied with their technical knowledge and used mobile phones for online activities. However, many students faced difficulties with slow internet connections, unclear audio, and device malfunctions. While 58% of students were satisfied with their online activities, 12% expressed dissatisfaction. A significant number of lecturers (87.5%) preferred face-to-face teaching. Lecturers (75%) reported three major issues: equipment problems, lack of student responses, and internet-related difficulties. Students suggested providing clearer instructions for online activities, while lecturers recommended offering flexible solutions for online assignment submission and grading. Additionally, the researcher proposes the creation of a convenient communication channel, especially for students’ grievances, to promptly resolve any issues related to online activities.
Article visualizations:
Referències
Academic-Faculties. OUSL. (n.d.). https://www.ou.ac.lk/
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2017). Digital learning compass: Distance education enrollment report 2017. Babson Survey Research Group. Retrieved from https://www.bayviewanalytics.com/reports/digtiallearningcompassenrollment2017.pdf
Anderson, T. (2019). Online learning: Definitions, types, and effectiveness. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.aupress.ca/app/uploads/120146_99Z_Anderson_2008-Theory_and_Practice_of_Online_Learning.pdf
Appanna, S. (2008). A Review of Benefits and Limitations of Online Learning in the Context of the Student, the Instructor, and the Tenured Faculty. International Jl. On E-Learning, vol 7, no. 1, p.5, 6, 7, 14. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237143888_A_Review_of_Benefits_and_Limitations_of_Online_Learning_in_the_Context_of_the_Student_the_Instructor_and_the_Tenured_Faculty
Artino, A. R. (2007). Interplay of motivation and performance in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 101-116. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Anthony-Artino/publication/27403453_Learning_online_Understanding_academic_success_from_a_self-regulated_learning_perspective/links/55ddd0be08aeaa26af0f1b09/Learning-online-Understanding-academic-success-from-a-self-regulated-learning-perspective.pdf
Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning, and distance education (2nd ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Technology-e-learning-and-Distance-Education/Bates/p/book/9780415284370
Brandt, D.S. (2021). Teaching The Net: Innovative Techniques in Internet Training. The 11Th Annual Computers in Business Conference, Retrieved from https://www.coursehero.com/file/p4f6p33/Brandt-S-D-1996-Teaching-the-net-Innovative-techniques-in-internet-training/. Accessed 25 August 2023.
Barbour, M. K., & Reeves, T. C. (2009). The reality of virtual schools: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 52(2), 402-416. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ823142
Bartley, S. J., and J. H. Bartley (2004). Best Practices in Distance Education: A Review. Creative Education, vol 4, no. 12, p. 169. Scientific Research- An Academic Publisher, doi:10.4236/me.2014.51005. Accessed 19 August 2023.
Bosath, K. A. (2020). Strategies for addressing technical challenges in online learning. Journal of Distance Education, 35(2), 45–60.
Choudhary, H., Ahmad, N., Alqahtani, J., & Qahmash, A. I. (2023). Mobile learning in higher education: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15 (18), 13566. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151813566
Chung, S., Lee, M., & Kwon, Y. (2021). Assessing student satisfaction in online learning: A comparison of satisfaction levels across academic disciplines. International Journal of Educational Technology, 15(1), 42-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/njbms.v1i1.66168
Creswell, J., & Creswell, D. (2018). Research design - qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed., p. 352). SAGE. Retrieved from https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage Publications. https://spada.uns.ac.id/pluginfile.php/510378/mod_resource/content/1/creswell.pdf
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. Retrieved from https://collegepublishing.sagepub.com/products/designing-and-conducting-mixed-methods-research-3-241842
Galadi, N. (2020). The impact of home learning environments on online education: A review of current trends. Journal of Online Learning and Education, 15(3), 45-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jole.2020.04.005
Garrison, D. R., & Anderson, T. (2003). E-learning in the 21st century: A framework for research and practice. Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/E-Learning-in-the-21st-Century-A-Community-of-Inquiry-Framework-for-Research-and-Practice/Garrison/p/book/9781138953567
Harvard Business Publishing. (2023). Building inclusive virtual classrooms. Retrieved from https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiring-minds/building-inclusive-virtual-classrooms
Hiltz, S. R. (1994). The virtual classroom: Learning without limits via computer networks. Prentice-Hall. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Virtual_Classroom.html?id=A9J-svunvD0C&redir_esc=y
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. Retrieved from https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
Hossain, M. A., & Ahmed, S. (2016). Academic use of smartphones by university students: A developing country perspective. Education and Information Technologies, 21(6), 1587-1601. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/EL-07-2015-0112
Ibáñez, Marisol Clark, and Linda Scott. (2007). Learning To Teach Online". Teaching Sociology, vol 36, no. 1, p. 37. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20058625.pdf?ab_segments=0%252Fbasic_expensive%252Fcontrol&refreqid=excelsior%3Ac2cff5a46bb3d827d258181f5ebc8fb8. Accessed 21 August 2023.
Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., & Freeman, A. (2016). NMC horizon report: 2016 higher education edition. The New Media Consortium. Retrieved from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/171478/
Jones, D., Smith, R., & Taylor, A. (2021). Exploring online teaching: Faculty perspectives and challenges. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 98-104. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5423
Koenig, P. (2019). Faculty preferences for teaching formats: A comparative study of face-to-face and online instruction. Journal of Higher Education, 30(4), 112-125.
Liu, S., Wang, X., & Li, Z. (2023). Challenges in mobile learning: A case study in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 71(2), 487–509. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10089-9
Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R., Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2014). The effectiveness of online and blended learning: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Teachers College Record. Retrieved from https://www.sri.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/effectiveness_of_online_and_blended_learning.pdf
Mesuwini, J., & Mokoena, S. (2024). Exploring Online Teaching and Learning Challenges for the Technical and Vocational Education and Training Lecturer. Journal of Education and e-Learning Research, 11(1), 193-202. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.20448/jeelr.v11i1.5423
Mtebe, J. S., & Raisamo, R. (2014). Investigating students' behavioral intention to adopt and use mobile learning in higher education in East Africa. International Journal of Education and Development using ICT, 10(3), 4–20. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1059061.pdf
Pearson Education. (2015). Pearson Student Mobile Device Survey. Pearson Education Reports. Retrieved from https://www.pearsoned.com/research/
Resnik, D. (2020). What Is Ethics in Research & Why Is It Important? National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Retrieved 22 August 2023, from https://www.niehs.nih.gov/research/resources/bioethics/whatis/index.cfm.
Runnels, Mary K. Tallent et al. (2006). Teaching Courses Online: A Review of The Research. Review of Educational Research, vol 76, no. 1, pp. 93, 116. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543076001093
Rosenberg, M. J. (2001). E-learning: Strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw-Hill. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(02)00082-9
Rovai, A. P. (2002). Building sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1), 1-16. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v3i1.79
Smith, J., & Roberts, A. (2022). Student satisfaction in online learning environments: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Online Education, 34(2), 55-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/3ICT56508.2022.9990873
Smith, J. S., & Taylor, R. (2021). Online teaching challenges: Faculty perspectives on technology and engagement. Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 212-229.
Song, Y., Zhao, T., & Cheng, X. (2021). Exploring student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(3), 105.
Tashakkori, A. and Newman, I. (2023). Mixed methods, Mixed Methods - an overview ScienceDirect Topics. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/topics/psychology/mixed-methods (Accessed: 18 December 2023).
The Open University of Sri Lanka (2023). Meme No. VV /23/180/11 Proposal to offer a revised and restructured degree in bachelor of education honours in special needs education programme in accordance with the Sri Lanka qualification farmwork. Colombo: Nawala.
The Open University of Sri Lanka (OUSL). (n.d.). https://www.devex.com/organizations/the-open-university-of-sri-lanka-ousl-20513
UptoSkills. (2023). The benefits of online learning: Flexibility, accessibility, and personalization. Retrieved from https://uptoskills.com
Vonderwell, S. and Savery, J. (2004). Online Learning: Student Role and Readiness, The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 3(5), pp. 38–42. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1101894.pdf
Descàrregues
Publicat
Número
Secció
Llicència
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
