DIGITAL READING AND COMPREHENSION PLATFORM IN EFL: ENGAGEMENT PATTERNS AND GRAMMAR OUTCOMES

Autors/ores

  • Melisa Bureković Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Goran Grubešić Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i3.6580

Paraules clau:

EFL learners, digital platform engagement, grammar achievement, proficiency levels B2 and C1

Resum

This study examines patterns of engagement with a digital reading and comprehension platform among EFL learners at two proficiency levels (B2 and C1) and explores the relationship between platform-based performance indicators and formal grammatical achievement. The participants were 44 university-level EFL students who used the same digital platform over the course of one academic semester. Platform data included the total number of completed quizzes, accumulated knowledge points, quiz success rates, and average platform level, while grammatical achievement was measured using final course grades. The results revealed statistically significant differences between proficiency groups in engagement intensity, with C1 students completing more quizzes and accumulating higher knowledge point totals than B2 students. No significant differences were found in quiz success rates or average platform levels. Correlational analyses showed no statistically significant associations between individual platform variables and grammar grades in either group. However, distinct patterns emerged across proficiency levels. In the B2 group, grammar grades showed weak positive tendencies in relation to measures of task quantity, whereas in the C1 group, relatively stronger tendencies were observed for performance-related indicators such as quiz success rate and average platform level. Multiple regression analyses further indicated that platform engagement variables did not significantly predict grammar course grades when considered simultaneously. Overall, the findings suggest that the relationship between digital platform engagement and grammatical achievement is indirect and mediated by learner proficiency, highlighting the need to distinguish between quantitative and qualitative dimensions of digital engagement in EFL contexts.

Biografies de l'autor/a

  • Melisa Bureković, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Melisa Bureković (PhD) is an Associate Professor in the Department of English Language and Literature at the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina. She obtained both her MA and PhD in Linguistics from the University of Sarajevo. Her teaching career began in primary and secondary schools before transitioning to higher education, where she has accumulated nineteen years of experience. Her research focuses on descriptive and theoretical syntax of English, corpus linguistics, and contrastive analysis, with a particular emphasis on their practical applications in language learning and teaching.

    ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0002-4036-9729

  • Goran Grubešić, Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica, Bosnia and Herzegovina

    Goran Grubešić is an EFL teacher. He earned his Master's degree in the English Language and Literature at the University of Sarajevo. He had taught English as a foreign language in several primary and secondary schools prior to taking up the post of a teaching assistant at the English Language and Literature department of the Faculty of Philosophy, University of Zenica. The fields of his professional enhancement include Linguistics, Language Teaching and Translation.

Referències

Brdarević-Čeljo, A., Bećirović, S. and Bureković, M, 2018. The Use of Imaginative Conditional Clauses by Bosnian University-Level English-Majoring Students, The Journal of Linguistic and Intercultural Education – JoLIE 11(2), 2018, Alba Iulia, pp. 25-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.29302/jolie.2018.11.2.2

Bujak, A., & Bureković, M., 2025. Mobile-Assisted Language Learning between Functionality and Pedagogical Applicability: Experiences of Students at the University of Zenica, Spoznaja, Filozofski fakultet Univerziteta u Zenici, pp. 91-105. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.65368/SPOZNAJA202501056

Bureković, M, 2012a. Status obilježja negacije u engleskom i bosanskom/hrvatskom/srpskom jeziku, Zbornik radova Islamskog Pedagoškog fakulteta u Zenici 10, pp. 381-398. Retrieved from https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=205391

Bureković, M., 2012b. Primjena korpusne lingvistike u nastavi engleskog kao stranog jezika. In Zbornik radova Međunarodnog naučno-stručnog skupa Edukacija za budućnost, Pedagoški fakultet, Zenica, pp. 711-718. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322676590_Primjena_korpusne_lingvistike_u_nastavi_engleskog_jezika_kao_stranog_jezika

Bureković, M., 2013. Pregled proučavanja lingvističkog fenomena negacije, Zbornik radova Islamskog pedagoškog fakulteta u Zenici 11, pp. 276-296. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322676787_Pregled_proucavanja_lingvistickog_fenomena_negacije

Bureković, M., 2023. Negacija u engleskom i bosanskom jeziku: minimalistički pristup. Zenica: Meligrafprint. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/372134072_NEGACIJA_U_ENGLESKOM_I_BOSANSKOM_JEZIKU_minimalisticki_pristup

Bureković, M., 2025. Fenomen osjetljivosti na polaritet rečenice u engleskom jeziku. Zenica: Meligrafprint. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/392786237_Fenomen_osjetljivosti_na_polaritet_recenice_u_engleskom_jeziku

Bureković, M., Perenda, Š., & Rizvić-Eminović, E., 2025. Subject-verb concord proficiency among EFL Bosnian students. European Journal of Education Studies, 12(1), 339-355. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i1.5804

Bureković, M., Rizvić-Eminović, E., and Pilav, M, 2023. Review of Five Methods Used in English Language Teaching, Zbornik radova Islamskog pedagoškog fakulteta u Zenici 21/2023, pp. 447-466. http://dx.doi.org/10.51728/issn.2637-1480.2023.447

Burston, J, 2014. MALL: the pedagogical challenges. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 344–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2014.914539

Burston J, 2015. Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1):4-20. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/recall/article/abs/twenty-years-of-mall-project-implementation-a-metaanalysis-of-learning-outcomes/EE135E77EB10AD5DB8D1FA3F2CCC9317

Day, R. R., & Bamford, J., 1998. Extensive Reading in the Second Language Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900211

Grabe W, 2009. Reading in a Second Language: Moving from Theory to Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Reading_in_a_Second_Language.html?id=sWe8xB7xMzcC&redir_esc=y

Hu, M., & Nation, P., 2000. Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language 13(1): 403–430. https://doi.org/10.64152/10125/66973

Krashen S D, 1985. The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/inputhypothesisi0000kras/page/n1/mode/2up

Nation, I.S.P., & Macalister, J., 2026. Teaching ESL/EFL Reading and Writing (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003613756

Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L., 2000. Effectiveness of L2 Instruction: A Research Synthesis and Quantitative Meta-Analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.

https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00136

Ounissi, A., Romly, R., Ahmad Tajuddin, A. J., & Hasan, M. K, 2025. The evolution of online extensive reading and web-based platforms in EFL/ESL: A narrative review of impacts, challenges, and future directions. Australian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.29140/ajal.v8n1.102592

Renandya W. A., & Jacobs, G. M., 2002. Extensive reading: Why aren’t we all doing it? In J.C. Richards & W.A. Renandya (Eds.) Methodology in language teaching: An anthology of current practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 295-302. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/3492584/Extensive_reading_Why_arent_we_all_doing_it

Rizvić-Eminović, E., Bujak, A., and Bureković, M, 2018. A Study of Trends in the Level of English Language Grammatical Competence at Zenica University, The Future of Humanities, Education and Creative Industries: Proceedings of the 3rd ICECI Sarajevo 2017, IUS, pp 197-206. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324727507_A_Study_of_Trends_in_the_English_Language_Grammatical_Competence_at_Zenica_University

Rizvić-Eminović, E., Bureković, M., & Dervić, M, 2025. Patterns of language errors in the writing of Bosnian EFL students: A case study. Studies in English Language and Education, 12(2), 648-662. https://doi.org/10.24815/siele.v12i2.40374

Šukalić, Đ., Rizvić-Eminović, E., & Bureković, M, 2025. English language students' frequency, perception and purpose of use of MT and CAT tools. Eurasian Journal of English Language and Literature, 7(1), 1-12. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/393166721

Verspoor, M., Lowie, W., & Van Dijk, M., 2008. Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective. Modern Language Journal, 92(2), 214-231. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x

Waring R., & Nation, I. S. P., 2004. Second Language Reading and Incidental Vocabulary Learning. Angles on the English Speaking World, 4: 97–110. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285872812_Second_Language_Reading_and_Incidental_Vocabulary_Learning

Descàrregues

Publicat

2026-03-13

Número

Vol. 13 Núm. 3 (2026)

Secció

Articles

Llicència

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).