THE WEB OF POWER RELATIONS AND THE SCHOOL REGULATIVE DISCOURSE DURING PROSPECTIVE TEACHERS’ TEACHING PRACTICES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i2.3567Keywords:
teacher education, teaching practice, power, regulative discourse, knowledgeAbstract
The purpose of this paper, which utilises Foucault’s theoretical framework, is to study the effect the existent web of power relations and the school regulative discourse have on the formation of the students as teacher-subjects, during their teaching practice organised by a Department of Primary Education in Greece. The data were collected using two research tools: the interview and observation. The research findings showed that power relations are formed between the mentors and the students. Moreover, the mentors’ action unfolds on three levels. They simultaneously act as supervisors and evaluators, as lead-teachers in the classroom and as role-models for the students. It is through their action that the students become familiarized the school regulative discourse. The majority of the students conform to the norms of the school regulative discourse and obey the controls exercised by the mentors, during their practicum.
Article visualizations:
References
Abrahams, F. (2009). Examining the Preservice Practicum experience of undergraduate music education majors: exploring connections and dispositions through multiple perspectives. A critical grounded theory. Journal of Music Teacher Education, 19(1), 80–92. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/1057083709344044.
Aravanis, G. (1996). Discipline and Education: The role of punishment and rewards in primary school and kindergarten: theoretical approach- empirical research. Athens: Grigoris.
Armstrong, P. (2015). The discourse of Michel Foucault: A Sociological Encounter. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 29-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2013.10.009.
Asimaki, Α., Koustourakis, G., & Nikolakakos N. (2020). A Foucauldian disciplinary theorisation of inmate education in the Second Chance Schools in Greek prison: A case study. Studies in the Education of Adults, 52(1), 101-118. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02660830.2019.1595341.
Asimaki, Α., Nikolakakos N., & Vergidis, D. (2016). The concepts of power and discipline in the theory of Michel Foucault. Scientific Yearbook Arethas, 5, 93-118.
Babbie, E. (2010). The Practice of Social Research (12th ed.). USA: Wadsworth.
Beck, C., & Kosnik, C. (2002). Components of a Good Practicum Placement: Student Teacher Perceptions. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 81-98. Available at: http://teqjournal.org/Back%20Issues/Volume%2029/VOL29%20PDFS/29_2/sp02beck_kosnick-29_2.pdf.
Braun, A. (2011). ‘Walking yourself around as a teacher’: gender and embodiment in student teachers’ working lives. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 32(2), 275-291. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2011.547311.
Britzman, D. P. (2003). Practice makes practice: A critical study of learning to teach. New York: SUNY Press.
Buckland, R. (2016). The decision by approved mental health professionals to use compulsory powers under the mental health act 1983: A Foucauldian Discourse Analysis. British Journal of Social Work, 46, 46-62. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcu114.
Butler, J. (2017). What is Critique? An essay on Foucault’s Virtue. Athens: Plethron.
Deleuze, G. (2005). Foucault. Athens: Plethron.
Edwards, A., & Collison, J. (1995). What Do Teacher Mentors Tell Student Teachers About Pupil Learning in Infant Schools?. Teachers and Teaching: theory and practice, 1(2), 265-279. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1354060950010208.
Foucault, Μ. (1989). Discipline and Punish: The birth of the Prison. Athens: Kedros.
Foucault, M. (1990). The order of discourse. Athens: Iridanos.
Foucault, M. (1991). The microphysics of power. Athens: Ypsilon.
Foucault, M. (1994). Two lectures. In: K. Michael (Ed.), Critique and Power: Recasting the Foucault/Habermas debate (pp. 17-46). Cambridge: MIT Press.
Foucault, Μ. (2005). The history of sexuality: The will to knowledge (vol.1). Athens: Κedros.
Foucault, M. (2008). The Eye of Power. Thessaloniki: Vanias.
Foucault, M. (2010). Abnormal: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1974-1975. Athens: Estia.
Foucault, M. (2016a). The Punitive Society: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1972-1973. Athens: Plethron.
Foucault, M. (2016b). What is Critique?. Athens: Plethron.
Germanos, D. (1993). Space and educational processes: The pedagogical quality of space. Athens: Gutenberg.
Grawitz, M. (2006). Methodology in the Social Sciences (vol.2). Athens: Odisseas.
Hildenbrand, S., & Arndt, K. (2016). Student teachers’ management practices in elementary classrooms: a qualitative study. Teacher Development, 20 (2), 147-161. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2016.1143869.
Izadinia, M. (2016). Student teachers’ and mentor teachers’ perceptions and expectations of a mentoring relationship: do they match or clash? Professional Development in Education, 42(3), 387-402. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2014.994136.
Jones, D., & Ball, S. (1994). Michel Foucault and the Discourse of Education. In: Ι. Solomon, & Ι. Kouzelis (Eds.), Discipline and Knowledge (pp. 169-178). Athens: Ε.Μ.Ε.Α.
Karras, Κ. (2011). The teacher in a changing world. Athens: Gutenberg.
Kossivaki, F. (2003). The role of the teacher in post-modern school: Expectations, Perspectives, Limits. Athens: Gutenberg.
Koustourakis, G. (2007). The new educational policy for the reform of the curriculum and the change of school knowledge in the case of Greek compulsory education. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 17(1/2), 131-146. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/09620210701433878.
Koustourakis, G. (2018). Analysing the curriculum for students with mild and moderate learning difficulties concerning the teaching of pre-vocational skills. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 39(8), 1210-1225. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2018.1497948.
Koutselini-Ioannidou, Μ. (1996). Discipline in primary school in a post-modern era. Modern Education, 90-91, 55-60.
Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content Analysis: Introduction to its Methodology (2nd ed). London: Sage.
Kyriazi, Ν. (2000). Sociological Research: Critical overview of methods and techniques. Athens: Ellinika Grammata.
Lazaroiu, G. (2013). Besley on Foucault’s Discourse of Education. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 45(8), 821-832. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2013.785092.
Lilha, M, & Vinthagen S. (2014). Sovereign power, disciplinary power and biopower: resisting what power with what resistance? Journal of Political Power, 7(1), 107-126. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2014.889403.
Loizou, E. (2011). The diverse facets of power in early childhood mentor–student-teacher relationships. European Journal of Teacher Education, 34(4), 373–386. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2011.587112.
Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative Researching (2nd ed.). London: Sage Publications.
McNay, M. (2004). Power and Authority in Teacher Education. The Educational Forum, 68(1), 72-81. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/00131720308984605.
Mialaret, G. (2012). Introduction. In: K. G. Karras, & C. C. Wolhuter (Eds.), Teachers’ education in the 21st century: Modern trends and challenges in teachers’ education systems in 90 countries (pp. 21-23). Athens: Ion.
Molla, T. & Nolan, A. (2020). Teacher agency and professional practice. Teachers and Teaching, 26(1), 67-87. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1740196.
Oikonomidis, V. (2007). Students judge their practicum: A case study. In: H. Hatzidimou, G. Konstantinos, P. Stravakou, & Κ. Hatzidimou (Eds.). 5th Panhellenic Conference of Greek Pedagogy and Educational Research (pp. 205-214). Thessaloniki: Aderfi Kyriakidi.
Pitsoe V., & Letseka, M. (2013). Foucault’s Discourse and Power: Implications for Instructionist Classroom Management. Open Journal of Philosophy, 3(1), 23-28. Available at: https://www.scirp.org/html/27781.html.
Rajuan, M., Beijaard D., & Verloop, N. (2007). The role of the cooperating teacher: bridging the gap between the expectations of cooperating teachers and student teachers. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 15(3), 223-242. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/13611260701201703.
Santoro, Ν. (1999). Relationships of power: An analysis of school practicum discourse. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 20(1), 31-42. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/07256868.1999.9963469
Silverman, D., & Marvasti, A. (2008). Doing Qualitative Research: A Comprehensive Guide. London: Sage.
Solomon, I. (1992). Power and order in Modern Greek school: A typology of school spaces and practices 1820-1900. Athens: Alexandria.
Sumara, D. J., & Luce-Kapler, R. (1996). (Un)becoming a teacher: Negotiating identities while learning to teach. Canadian Journal of Education, 21(1), 65–83.
Tasi, S. (2014). The ‘disciplinary society’ of Michel Foucault and the autopoieticly developing society of Niklas Luhmann. Review of Social Research, 142, 101- 121.
Troulinou, L. (1991). Power and Law in Foucault. In: M. Foucault, The microphysics of power (pp. 170-182). Athens: Ypsilon.
Vamvoukas, Μ. (2000). Introduction to psycho-pedagogical research and methodology. Athens: Grigoris.
Veyne, P. (2011). Foucault: His thought, his character. Athens: Estia.
Wexler, L. J. (2020). “Empowering” Instead of “Crushing an Idea”: One Student Teacher/Mentor Teacher Pair’s Story of Learning and Growing. The New Educator, 16(3), 265-278. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1080/1547688X.2020.1727594.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content Analysis: A Flexible Methodology. Library Trends, 55(1), 22-45. Available at: https://muse.jhu.edu/article/202361.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


