SUPPRESSED DISCIPLINARY ACTION FOR FACULTIES IN THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF STUDENTS

Forfattere

  • Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin PhD, Faculty, Institute of Education, Undergraduate Studies Department Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines
  • Lourdes Oliva C. Paraiso Faculty, Institute of Accounts, Business, and Finance, BA Department, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i12.4583

Nøgleord:

suppressed disciplinary action for faculties, academic performance of students, promotion of good methods of classroom discipline, management in handling classroom conflicts, mastery of school discipline, guidelines, and procedures, consistency of fairnes

Resumé

The study aims to identify the effects of suppressed disciplinary action for faculties on the academic performance of students such as the promotion of good methods of classroom discipline, management in handling classroom conflicts, mastery of school discipline, guidelines, and procedures, consistency of fairness and positivism, and maintain classroom standards for the academic performance of students. A descriptive quantitative research design is utilized in the study and relies on purposive sampling in the selection of the sample size of the study. Hence, the study comprised sixty (60) respondents only. Results show that the promotion of good methods of classroom discipline manages to keep the classroom in orderly manner to maintain attractive and cheerful classroom discipline that prevents disruptive and disorderly behavior of students, handling classroom conflicts shows that faculties serve as guidance among students regarding where they will be treated with tender loving care, mastery of school discipline, guidelines, and procedures shows to develop skills for classroom management in maintaining the key of positive learning environment, consistency of fairness and positivism adheres to the experiences and observation for the necessity of discipline, and maintaining classroom standard for the academic performance of students shows to provide initiatives on the resources and materials needed in the academic performance of the learners, and technology of teaching and learning are utilized properly to equip students in the learning process. Findings show that there is a significant relationship on the effects of suppressed disciplinary action for teachers on the academic performance of students in the area of promotion of good methods of classroom discipline, management in handling classroom conflicts, mastery of school discipline, guidelines, and procedures, consistency of fairness and positivism, and maintain classroom standards for the academic performance of students as observed by the respondents.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Forfatterbiografier

  • Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin, PhD, Faculty, Institute of Education, Undergraduate Studies Department Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines

    Dr. Leovigildo Lito D. Mallillin is a faculty member of the Institute of Education, Undergraduate Studies Department at Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines. He is a Doctor of Philosophy in Development Education, Master of Arts in Administration and Supervision, and Bachelor of Secondary Education, majoring in English at Isabela State University as Cum Laude. He is a former International Lecturer at Al-Fateh University, North Africa and Gulf College at Sultanate of Oman which is affiliated with Staffordshire University and Cardiff Metropolitan University, London, UK. Published several research articles in different international journals. Recipient of Model Achiever Awardee for Education in 2005 and Model Achiever Awardee for English Language and Research Methodology in 2007. Obtained a certificate in Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages/Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TESOL/TEFL). His research interests are development and professional education, English language, and research methods.

  • Lourdes Oliva C. Paraiso, Faculty, Institute of Accounts, Business, and Finance, BA Department, Far Eastern University, Manila, Philippines

    Lourdes Oliva C. Paraiso is a candidate of Doctor of Business Administration (DBA) at La Consolacion University, Manila. At present, she is connected at Far Eastern University, Manila as Faculty at the Institute of Accounts, Business, and Finance-BA Department. Her Philosophy in life is “To teach is to learn first” as her guidepost within and beyond the walls of a university in the dispatch of her profession. She continues to learn to be relevant and be worthy to be in the fold of an educational institution. Her research interests are Business Management Innovation, Development in Accountancy, and Finance Management Administration.

Referencer

Abante, A., Cruz, R., Guevarra, D., Lanada, M. I. B., Macale, M. J. S., Roque, M. W. B., ... & Cabrera, W. C. (2021). A comparative analysis on the challenges of online learning modality and modular learning modality: A basis for training program. International journal of multidisciplinary research and analysis, 4(04), 463-476.

Almoslamani, Y. (2022). The impact of learning strategies on the academic achievement of university students in Saudi Arabia. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf Perspectives.

Bloomfield, J., & Fisher, M. J. (2019). Quantitative research design. Journal of the Australasian Rehabilitation Nurses Association, 22(2), 27-30.

Camangian, P., & Cariaga, S. (2022). Social and emotional learning is hegemonic miseducation: Students deserve humanization instead. Race Ethnicity and Education, 25(7), 901-921.

Coverdale, H. B. (2020). What makes a response to schoolroom wrongs permissible?. Theory and Research in Education, 18(1), 23-39.

Cruz, R. A., Firestone, A. R., & Rodl, J. E. (2021). Disproportionality reduction in exclusionary school discipline: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 91(3), 397-431.

de Soto, J. A. (2022). The Constructivism of Social Discourse: Toward a Contemporaneous Understanding of Knowledge. Scientific Research, an Academic Publisher (OJPP), 12(3).

Gehlbach, H., Mascio, B., & McIntyre, J. (2022). Social perspective taking: A professional development induction to improve teacher–student relationships and student learning. Journal of Educational Psychology.

Green, A. L., Hatton, H., Stegenga, S. M., Eliason, B., & Nese, R. N. (2021). Examining commitment to prevention, equity, and meaningful engagement: A review of school district discipline policies. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 23(3), 137-148.

Habibi, H., Bigdeli, S., Sohrabi, Z., & Ebadi, A. (2022). Professionalism among academic educational leaders: A concept analysis. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 10(4), 259-266.

Haque, A. U., & Yamoah, F. A. (2021). The role of ethical leadership in managing occupational stress to promote innovative work behaviour: A cross-cultural management perspective. Sustainability, 13(17), 9608.

Irwin, V., Wang, K., Cui, J., Zhang, J., & Thompson, A. (2021). Report on indicators of school crime and safety: 2020. National Center for Education Statistics.

Johler, M. M. S., Krumsvik, R. J., Bugge, H. E., & Helgevold, N. (2022). Teachers’ perceptions of their role and classroom management practices in a technology rich primary school classroom.

Kidder, W. C. (2021). The University of California’s Faculty Code of Conduct at Fifty: A Procedural and Sociological History of UC’s Evolving Ecosystem of Policies, Rules and Norms for Faculty Discipline.

Kim, S., Spadafora, N., Craig, W., Volk, A. A., & Zhang, L. (2021). Disciplinary structure and teacher support in Chinese and Canadian schools: Examining how authoritative disciplinary practices protect youth involved in bullying at school. School mental health, 13(3), 501-517.

Kreitzer, R. J., & Sweet-Cushman, J. (2022). Evaluating student evaluations of teaching: A review of measurement and equity bias in SETs and recommendations for ethical reform. Journal of Academic Ethics, 20(1), 73-84.

Krutzinna, J. (2022). Who is “The Child”? Best Interests and Individuality of Children in Discretionary Decision-Making. The International Journal of Children's Rights, 30(1), 120-145.

McNeil, B. J. (2022). An Examination of Patterns in Educator’s Demographics and Factors in The Discipline Decision-Making Process That Lead To An Office Discipline Referral (Doctoral dissertation).

Mallillin, L. L. D. (2020). Different Domains in Learning and the Academic Performance of the Students. Journal of Educational System, 4(1), 1-11.

Mallillin, L. L. D. (2021). Job Satisfaction and Favorable Outcome on Teachers’ Work Performance: The Noblest Profession.

Mallillin, L. L. D. (2021). Teacher Theory and Adaptable Model: An Application to Teaching Profession. European Journal of Education Studies, 8(12).

Mallillin, L. L. D. (2022). Teaching and learning intervention in the educational setting: adapting the teacher theory model. International Journal of Educational Innovation and Research, 1(2), 12-38.

Mallillin, L. L. D., & Laurel, R. D. (2022). Professional Development System Theory for Quality Education. European Journal of Education Studies, 9(8).

Mallillin, L. L. D., & Mallillin, J. B. (2019). Competency skills and performance level of faculties in the higher education institution (HEI). European Journal of Education Studies.

Manangan, M. G. S. (2022). School Leadership Practices Towards Enhanced Classroom Management, School Environment, and Academic Performance of Students. American Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research, 6(3), 91-104.

Roeser, R. W., Mashburn, A. J., Skinner, E. A., Choles, J. R., Taylor, C., Rickert, N. P., ... & Sorenson, J. (2022). Mindfulness training improves middle school teachers’ occupational health, well-being, and interactions with students in their most stressful classrooms. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(2), 408.

Shin, D. (2021). The effects of explainability and causability on perception, trust, and acceptance: Implications for explainable AI. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 146, 102551.

Stachowiak-Kudła, M. (2021). Academic freedom as a source of rights’ violations: a European perspective. Higher Education, 82(5), 1031-1048.

Stewart, M. (2021). Understanding learning: Theories and critique. In University teaching in focus (pp. 3-28). Routledge.

Thomas, F. B. (2022). The Role of Purposive Sampling Technique as a Tool for Informal Choices in a Social Sciences in Research Methods.

Topali, P., Ortega‐Arranz, A., Martínez‐Monés, A., & Villagrá‐Sobrino, S. L. (2021). “Houston, we have a problem”: Revealing MOOC practitioners' experiences regarding feedback provision to learners facing difficulties. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(4), 769-785.

Vettori, G., Vezzani, C., Bigozzi, L., & Pinto, G. (2020). Cluster profiles of university students’ conceptions of learning according to gender, educational level, and academic disciplines. Learning and Motivation, 70, 101628.

Downloads

Publiceret

2022-12-04

Nummer

Årg. 9 Nr. 12 (2022)

Sektion

Articles

Licens

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).