AN INVESTIGATION INTO READING STRATEGIES USED BY VIETNAMESE NON-ENGLISH MAJORED STUDENTS: THE CASE OF A UNIVERSITY IN VIETNAM

Authors

  • Lam Ky Nhan MA, Nam Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i11.5079

Keywords:

ESL reading strategies, strategy preference, reading ability

Abstract

Reading comprehension is a critical feature in English language acquisition for all students since it serves as the foundation for teaching in all aspects of language learning (Mikulecky, 2008). Comprehension improves when the reader actively employs suitable reading methods (Brown, 1980). Furthermore, reading is a skill that receives the most focus in the typical English language school (Susser & Rob, 1990). Reading strategies should be used by students to plan how they will read and to improve their reading comprehension (Poole, 2010). The goal of this study was to look into how university students employ English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading methods. There were 84 students from a university in the Mekong Delta that took part. Mokhtari and Reichard’s (2002) Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS) was utilized as the instrument to collect data on the participants’ use of reading strategies. The findings revealed that EFL high school students were well aware of the usage of reading strategies. Global reading strategies were preferred by students, followed by support strategies and problem-solving strategies. The implications of employing EFL reading skills were also highlighted.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Author Biography

  • Lam Ky Nhan, MA, Nam Can Tho University, Can Tho, Vietnam

    Lam Ky Nhan earned his M.A. in English Education from Can Tho University in 2021. He is a lecturer of general English and English for specific purposes at Nam Can Tho University, Vietnam, currently pursuing his Ph.D’s, with anticipated graduation in 2026. His teaching interests include teaching grammar and academic writing, teacher and learner motivation, testing, and assessment.

References

Aebersold, J. A., & Field, M. L. (1997). From Reader to Reading Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364-373.

Alvermann, D., & Earle, J. (2003). Comprehension instruction. In A. P. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 12-30). New York: Guilford Press.

Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R.J. Spỉro, B.C. Bruce, & W.E. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension. Perspective from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum.

Carrell, P. L. (1988). Some causes of text-boundedness and schema interference in ESL reading. In Carrell, P. L., Devine, J., & Eskey, D. E. (Eds.), Interactive Approaches to Second Language Reading. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Cogmen, S., & Saracaloglu, A. S. (2009). Students’ usage of reading strategies in the faculty of education. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 248-251.

Cohen, A. (1990). Language learning: Insights for learner, teachers, and researchers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Dreyer, C. & Nel C. (2003). Teaching reading strategies and reading comprehension within a technology-enhanced learning environment. System 31, 349- 365.

Durkin, D. (1993). Teaching them to read (6th Ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Garner, R. (1987). Metacognition and Reading Comprehension. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

Hsu, Li-W. (2008). Taiwanese Hospitality College Students’ English Reading Strategies in English for Specific Purpose Courses. Journal of Hospitality and Home Economics, 5(1), 53-67.

Kummin, S., & Rahman, S. (2010). The relationship between the use of meta-problem-solving strategies and achievement in English. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 7(C), 145-150.

Maarof, N., & Yaacob, M. (2011). Meaning-making in the first and second language: reading strategies of Malaysian students. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 12, 211– 223.

McDonough, J. and Shaw, C. (2013). Materials and Methods in ELT: A Teacher’s Guide (3rd edition). Oxford: Blackwell.

Mikulecky, B. S. (2008). Teaching Reading in a Second Language. Pearson Education, Inc.

Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94 (2), 249-259.

Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25, 2-10.

Pani, S. (2004). Reading strategy instruction through mental modeling. ELT Journal, 58(4), 355-362.

Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of problem-solving and global strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26-56.

Poole, A. (2010). The reading strategies used by male and female English language learners: A study of Colombian high school students. New England Reading Association Journal,46(1), 55-63.

Susser, B., & Robb, T.N. (1990). EFL Extensive Reading Instruction: Research and Procedure. JALT Journal, 12(2), 161-185.

Downloads

Published

2023-10-26

Issue

Section

Articles