MEASURING VOCABULARY GAINS THROUGH CLIL: EVIDENCE FROM PICTURE-BASED ASSESSMENT IN MONGOLIAN–KAZAKH BILINGUAL SCHOOLS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i1.6506Nøgleord:
bilingualism, Mongolian language, target language, vocabularyResumé
In secondary schools providing bilingual education, the CLIL (Content and Language Integrated Learning) approach was implemented and evaluated. Baseline and post-intervention data were collected through questionnaires, interviews, and standardized tests, including the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test, which was used to assess the vocabulary development of fourth-grade students. At the baseline stage, the performance levels of the experimental and control groups were comparable, with mean scores of 58.2% and 52.9%, respectively. Following the implementation of the CLIL methodology, results from the post-intervention assessment showed that students in the experimental group demonstrated a 12.4% improvement in vocabulary performance across the two assessment points. This article reports the findings of the study on bilingual students’ vocabulary development as measured by the Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. The research results have been formally presented to the Ministry of Education and Science, the General Authority for Education, the Mongolian National Institute for Educational Research, and the World Bank.
Article visualizations:
Referencer
Anderson RC, Nagy WE. Word meanings. In: Barr R, Kamil ML, Mosenthal P, Pearson PD, editors. Handbook of reading research. Vol 2. New York: Longman; 1991. p. 690–724. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED313672.pdf
Baker C. Foundations of bilingual education and bilingualism. 5th ed. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 2011. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Foundations_of_Bilingual_Education_and_B.html?id=HgbPBQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Baker SK, Simmons DC, Kame’enui EJ. Vocabulary acquisition: Synthesis of the research. Washington (DC): U.S. Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement, Educational Resources Information Center; 1998. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED386860
Blewitt P, Rump KM, Shealy SE, Cook SA. Shared book reading: When and how questions affect young children’s word learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2009;101(2):294–304. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013844
Coyne MD, Simmons DC, Kame’enui EJ, Stoolmiller M. Teaching vocabulary during shared storybook readings: An examination of differential effects. Exceptionality. 2004;12(3):145–162. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1203_3?urlappend=%3Futm_source%3Dresearchgate.net%26utm_medium%3Darticle
Coyle D. Content and language integrated learning: Towards a connected research agenda. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism. 2007;10(5):543–562. https://doi.org/10.2167/beb459.0
Coyle D, Hood P, Marsh D. CLIL: Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. Retrieved from https://assets.cambridge.org/97805211/30219/excerpt/9780521130219_excerpt.pdf
Cummins J. Language, power and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters; 2000.
Dalton-Puffer C. Content-and-language integrated learning: From practice to principles? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics. 2011;31:182–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190511000092
Dunn LM, Dunn DM. Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test. 4th ed. Minneapolis (MN): Pearson; 2007. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/t15144-000
Graves MF, Watts-Taffe SM. The place of word consciousness in a research-based vocabulary program. In: Samuels SJ, Farstrup AE, editors. What research has to say about reading instruction. 3rd ed. Newark (DE): International Reading Association; 2002. p. 140–165.
Grove C, Young C. Promoting and delivering literacy in multilingual environments. Stoke-on-Trent: Trentham Books; 2008. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000161237
Heugh K. Multilingual education: Contexts, theories and practices. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language and Education: Multilingual Education for All in Asia and the Pacific – Policies, practices and processes; 2013; Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from https://www.teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/Using_multilingual_approaches.pdf
Heugh K. Multilingual education policy in Africa. Paris: UNESCO; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405198431.wbeal0782
Hult FM. Sustainable multilingual education. In: Language and sustainable development. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2023. p. 51–77. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-24918-1_4
Justice LM, Meier J, Walpole S. Learning new words from storybooks: An efficacy study with at-risk kindergartners. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools. 2005;36(1):17–32. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2005/003)
Marsh D. CLIL/EMILE – The European dimension: Actions, trends and foresight potential. Brussels: European Commission; 2002.
Nation ISP. Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524759
Rosenthal J, Ehri LC. The mnemonic value of orthography for vocabulary learning. Journal of Educational Psychology. 2008;100(1):175–191. Retrieved from https://literacy.kent.edu/ohioliteracyalliance/research/pdf/rosenthal.pdf
UNESCO. Language of instruction. Paris: UNESCO; 2020. Available from: https://policytoolbox.iiep.unesco.org/policy-option/language-of-instruction/
UNESCO. Global education monitoring report: Inclusion and education. Paris: UNESCO Publishing; 2020. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373724
World Bank Group. Loud and clear: Effective language education policies for learning. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2021. Retrieved from https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/education/publication/loud-and-clear-effective-language-of-instruction-policies-for-learning
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


