SCHOOL PROMOTION OF SOFT SKILLS AND TEACHERS' CLASSROOM PRACTICES: EVIDENCE FROM GENERAL AND SPECIAL EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i8.6936Nøgleord:
soft skills, school promotion, teachers' views, classroom practices, general education, special educationResumé
Soft skills are widely recognised as essential competencies for effective teaching and learning in contemporary education. While schools are expected to promote these competencies systematically, teachers play a central role in integrating them into everyday classroom practice. Nevertheless, research examining both school promotion of soft skills and teachers' classroom practices remains limited. This study aimed to explore general and special education teachers' views on school promotion of soft skills and to examine the frequency with which they incorporate the seven core soft skills into their classroom practice. The present article reports findings from the quantitative phase of a broader sequential explanatory mixed-methods study. The analyses focused on researcher-developed questionnaire items addressing school promotion of soft skills and teachers' classroom practices. The findings indicate that teachers did not perceive soft skills as being systematically promoted within contemporary schools. In contrast, they reported frequent use of all seven examined soft skills in their classroom practice, with empathy, collaboration, creativity, and effective communication emerging as the most frequently implemented competencies. Overall, the findings indicate a divergence between teachers' views on school promotion of soft skills and their reported classroom practices. The study underscores the importance of strengthening the systematic promotion of soft skills within school settings and highlights the need for educational policies and professional development initiatives that support their effective integration into teaching and learning.Referencer
Aldrup, K., Carstensen, B., Köller, M. M., & Klusmann, U. (2020). Measuring teachers’ social-emotional competence: Development and validation of a situational judgment test. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, Article 892. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00892
Cinque, M. (2016). “Lost in translation”: Soft skills development in European countries. Tuning Journal for Higher Education, 3(2), 389-427. https://doi.org/10.18543/tjhe-3(2)-2016pp389-427
Collie, R. J. (2020). The development of social and emotional competence at school: An integrated model. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 44(1), 76-87. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025419851864
Collie, R. J. (2021). COVID-19 and teachers’ somatic burden, stress, and emotional exhaustion: Examining the role of principal leadership and workplace buoyancy. AERA Open, 7, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2332858420986187
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Designing_and_Conducting_Mixed_Methods_R.html?id=eTwmDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405-432. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01564.x
European Commission. (2022). ESCO: European classification of skills, competences, qualifications and occupations. Publications Office of the European Union.
Heckman, J. J., & Kautz, T. (2012). Hard evidence on soft skills. Labour Economics, 19(4), 451-464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014
Mansfield, C., Beltman, S., Broadley, T., & Weatherby-Fell, N. (2016). Building resilience in teacher education: An evidenced informed framework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 54, 77-87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2015.11.016
OECD. (2021). Beyond academic learning: First results from the survey on social and emotional skills. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2021/09/beyond-academic-learning_46cf4e15/92a11084-en.pdf
OECD. (2024). Skills outlook 2024: Thriving in a digital world. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/2024/11/oecd-digital-economy-outlook-2024-volume-2_9b2801fc/full-report/skills-for-the-digital-age_da6162fb.html
Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-013-0528-y
Taha, N. M., Karim, N. A., & Vinayagan, N. L. (2024). Impact of social-emotional learning programmes on emotional intelligence and academic achievements of students. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science. https://doi.org/10.47772/IJRISS.2024.8120212
UNESCO. (2022). UNESCO global report 2022: Re/Shaping policies for creativity-Addressing culture as a global public good. UNESCO. https://doi.org/10.18356/9789210015240
UNESCO. (2023). Global education monitoring report 2023: Inclusion and education.
Downloads
Publiceret
Nummer
Sektion
Licens
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


