THE APPLICATION OF MURDER LEARNING MODEL AND EFFECT ON STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v7i11.3340Keywords:
MURDER, mood, understand, recall, digest, expand, review, learning outcomeAbstract
This study aims to analyze the differences in learning outcomes between students learning with the MURDER learning model and students who take conventional learning, namely lecturing on. This type of research used is the quasi-experimental design with the research design used Posttest-Only Control. The study population was grade VIII students at MTs. Darun Najah Al-Falah Telaga Waru West Lombok, Indonesia. The sample in this study were students of grade VIII totaling 40 people. The sampling technique used cluster sampling. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistical analysis. The learning outcome data were collected using a multiple-choice test instrument with a total of 20 questions. Based on the results of the data analysis, the results of tcount = 2.102 and ttable = 1.686 at the 5% significance level, which means tcount>ttable. The results of this study indicate that there are significant differences in learning outcomes between students using the MURDER learning model and students using conventional learning models. From the results of descriptive statistical analysis, it is known that the mean value of the experimental group is 64.5 and the mean value of the control group is 57.25. This means that the average score in the experimental group is greater than the average score in the control group, so it can be concluded that learning using the MURDER learning model has an effect on student learning outcomes.
Article visualizations:
References
Anwar, M. (2018). Menjadi Guru Profesional. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Berata, I. N., Kusmariyatni, N. N., & Widiana, I. W. (2013). Pengaruh Model Cooperative Learning Type Murder with Metacognitive Scaffolding (Clmms) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Ipa Kelas V Sd. MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.23887/jjpgsd.v1i1.834
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: David Mc Key.
Fathurrahman, M. (2015). Model-Model Pembelajaran Inovatif. Jogjakarta: Arruz Media.
Ferazona, S. (2020). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Melalui Penggunaan Strategi Active Sharing Knowledgeupaya Mempersiapkan Generasi Abad 21. Perspektif, XI(1).
Hamalik, O. (2015). Proses BelajarMengajar. Jakarta: BumiAksara.
Harahap, N. A., Ummah, K., Rohanawati, A. N., &Mardhatillah, S. R. (2019). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Student Center Learning (SCL) BerbasisAktivitas Pada Mata Kuliah Pendidikan Pancasila Di Fakultas Hukum. 1(2), 182–197.
Harjali. (2009). Penataan Lingkungan Belajar: Strategi untuk Guru dan Sekolah. Malang: CV Seribu Bintang.
Hayes, J. R. (1981). The Complete Problem Solver. Pennsylvania: Institute Press Philadelphia.
Lindgren, H. C. (1976). Lindgren, H. C., Educational Psychology in The Classroom, 6th ed (6th ed.). New York, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Musfah, J. (2018). Manajemen Pendidikan Aplikasi, Strategi, dan Inovasi. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group.
Permatahati, D. R., & Wangid, M. N. (2019). The Application of Murder Model with Image Media to Improving Student Learning Outcomes at the Fourth Grade Students. International E-Journal of Educational Studies, 3(6), 174–180. https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.604883
Prashing, B. (2007). The Power of Learning Styles: Mendongkrak Anak Melejitkan Prestasidengan Mengenali Gaya Belajarnya (Kaifa (ed.)). Bandung: Kaifa.
Retnowati, E., Jerusalem, M. A., & Sugiyarto, K. (2018). Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods in Educational Systems. International Conference on Teacher Education and Professional Development.
Rizali, A. (2009). Dari guru konvensionalmenuju guru profesional. Grasindo. Jakarta: Grasindo.
Rohani, A. (2010). PengelolaanPengajaranSebuahPengantarMenuju Guru Profesional. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
S. Bruner, J. (1960). The Processes of education. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
Sanjaya, W. (2014). Strategi PembelajaranBerorientasiStandar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Prenada Media.
Sugiyono (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suprijono, A. (2015). Cooperative Learning Teori Dan AplikasiPaikem. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Suyanto, & Jihad, A. (2013). Menjadi Guru Profesional: Strategi Meningkatkan Kualifikasi dan Kualitas Guru di Era Global. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.
Tang, S. F., & Lim, C. L. (2018). Preparing the Next Generation of Teachers for 21st Century Education. Igi Global.
UUtami, W. (2019). Peningkatan prestasi belajar ekonomi menggunakan strategi tutor sebaya dan snowball throwing pada peserta didik SMA N 15 Batam tahun pelajaran 2017 / 2018. Jurnal Kiprah, 20, 13–26.
Winkel, W. S. (1989). Psikologi Pendidikan dan Evaluasi Belajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
