UNDERGRADUATES’ PERCEPTION AND EXPECTATION OF UNIVERSITY EDUCATION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i1.3547Keywords:
perception of university, lecturer, expectation, science, future anxietyAbstract
The current study aimed to investigate undergraduates’ perception and expectation of university education, what degree their expectations were met, how they regard a qualified lecturer and what they think of their dream departments. The participants were 71 female undergraduates, ranging in age from 18 to 22 from Tokat Gaziosmanpaşa University, Turkey, in the 2020 – 2021 Academic Year. Data were collected in written with open-ended questions and were performed content analysis. The participants’ statements showed that a university mostly associates future anxiety and finance, a lecturer is expected to place importance on morality, science is the most expected aspect of a university, their departments mostly met what they have expected, and a university is supposed to meet learners’ social needs. On the other hand, the number of the ones who could not find the chance to study at their dream departments due to some reasons is remarkable. Drawing upon the results, it may be recommended that undergraduates’ perception of a university should be science rather than future anxiety and finance, their negative opinions about lecturers should be converted to positive, and if required, academic staff, principals and families should be given seminars in order to help meet undergraduates’ positive expectations.
Article visualizations:
References
Arap, S. K. (2007). Higher education policies and the choice of location for universities in Turkey. (Doctoral thesis). YÖK Thesis Center (Thesis no: 209635).
Baş, T., & Akturan, U. (2008). Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Bayrak, S. B. (2018). Relationship of hopelessness in adolescents with self-esteem and future anxiety. (Master’s thesis). YÖK Thesis Center (Thesis no: 514806).
Brophy, J. (1981). Teacher praise: A functional analysis. Review of Educational Research, 51(1), 5-32.
Burgaz, B., & Eki̇nci̇, C. (2007). The expectation and satisfaction levels of the students about the services provided by Hacettepe University. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1), 71-89.
Demirtaş, H., & Çoban, D. (2014). Metaphors that university students generate about the university and faculty concepts (Case study at the University of Inonu). Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(1), 113-143.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (2005). The sage handbook of qualitative research. California: Sage.
Ertem, Z. S., & Arı, A. (2016). High school students’ perception of university and faculty members. Cumhuriyet Uluslararası Eğitim Dergisi, 5(3).
Jeans, A. B. (1995). Teacher education: An international research agenda. World Conference on Teacher Education. İzmir: 9 Eylül Üniversitesi Yayınları.
Korukoğlu, A. (2003). Üniversite öğrencilerinin eğitimden beklentileri "Ege Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği". Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1).
Kostenius, C. (2011). Picture this – our dream school! Swedish schoolchildren sharing their visions of school. Childhood, 18(4), 509–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/0907568211398158
Marshall, C., & Rossman, B. G. (2006). Designing qualitative research. California: Sage.
Okumuş, A., & Duygun, A. (2008). Servıce qualıty measurement on educatıon servıces marketıng and relatıonshıp between perceıved servıce qualıty and student satısfactıon. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 8(2), 17-38.
Özodaşık, M. (1999). Cumhuriyet dönemi yeni bir nesil yetiştirme çalışmaları: 1923-1950. Konya: Çizgi Yayınevi.
Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. M. Bütün, & S.B. Demir (Trans. ed.), Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
Saydan, R. (2008). Qualıty expectatıon of the unıversıty stundents from unıversıty teachers: Case of Yuzuncu Yıl Unıversıty Faculty Of Economıcs And Admınıstratıve Scıences. Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1).
Sayılı, A. (2011). Ortaçağ İslam dünyasında yükseköğretim medrese (Trans. Recep Duran). Ankara: Öncü Kitap.
Singh, K. (2007). Quantitative social research methods. New Delhi: Sage.
Taşdemirci, E. (1989). Medreselerin doğuş kaynakları ve ilk zamanları. Erciyes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 2, 269-278.
Unat, F. R. (1964). Türkiye eğitim sisteminin gelişmesine tarihi bir bakış. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Basımevi.
Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2013). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


