FORMATIVE TESTING PROGRAM FOR UNDERGRADUATE EFL MOROCCAN STUDENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v8i4.3699Keywords:
academic achievement, proficiency level, remedial program, summative test, underachievementAbstract
While most previous studies attribute academic achievement to external and internal motivation, the present study associates academic achievement to language proficiency of EFL learners. Students’ underachievement of summative tests might be explained with their lack of English language proficiency. Students may have some gaps in the language that have been accumulated since elementary or high school. These gaps become fossilized in students’ minds if not addressed properly. In this regard, this study presents a testing method that leads to a remedial teaching program at the undergraduate level of the English studies at the Moroccan EFL University.
Article visualizations:
References
Akbarian I, 2010. The relationship between vocabulary size and depth for ESP/EAP learners. System, 38, 391-401.
Black P, Wiliam, D, 1998. Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5:1, 7-71.
Dweck C, S, 2007. Mindset: The New Psychology of Success. Ballantine.
Ellis N, C, 2012. Frequency-based accounts of second language acquisition. In S. M. Gass, & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition, pp.193-210. London/ New York: Routledge.
Kibble J, D, 2017. Best practices in summative assessment College of Medicine, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida.
McLeod J, 1979. Educational Underachievement. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12:5, 322–330. doi:10.1177/002221947901200508
Nation I, S, P, 1990. Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. New York: Newbury House.
National Research Council, 2000. Testing English-Language Learners in U.S. Schools: Report and Workshop Summary. Committee on Educational Excellence and Testing Equity. H. Kenji & A. Beatty, eds., Board on Testing and Assessment, Center for Education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Noro T, 2002. The roles of depth and breadth of vocabulary knowledge in reading comprehension in EFL. ARELE, 13, 71-80.
Nouri N, Zerhouni B, 2018. Lexical Frequency Effect on Reading Comprehension and Recall. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ), 9:2, 234-250. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.24093/awej/vol9no2.16
Sax G, 1980. Principles of Educational and Psychological Measurement and Evaluation. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company, pp 13-25;
Schmider E, Ziegler M, Danay E, Beyer L, Buehner M, 2010. Is it really robust? Methodology European Journal of Research Methods for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 6:4, 147-151.
Schmitt N, 2010. Researching Vocabulary: A vocabulary research manual, pp. xi-366. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Schmitt N, 2014. Size and depth of vocabulary knowledge: What the research shows. A Journal of Research in Language Studies, 64:4, 913-951. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12077
Shepard L, A, 2005. The Future of Assessment: Shaping Teaching and Learning New York. Proceedings of ETS Invitational Conference.
Smith E, 2003. Understanding Underachievement: an investigation into the differential attainment of secondary school pupils. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 24:5, 575-586. doi: 10.1080/0142569032000127143.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


