LECTURERS’ PERCEPTION OF FACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR STUDENTS’ LECTURE ATTENDANCE IN COLLEGES OF EDUCATION IN DELTA STATE, NIGERIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i5.4283Keywords:
lecturers, students, perception, lecture attendance, habit, colleges of educationAbstract
This study investigated lecturers’ perception of factors responsible for students’ lecture attendance in Colleges of Education in Delta State. Four research questions and two null hypotheses guided the study. The study used an ex-post facto research design with a descriptive survey method. The study's population consists of 865 lecturers from Delta State's colleges of education. A sample size of 345, representing 40% of the total population was selected through a stratified random sampling technique. A questionnaire was used to collect data. The questionnaire was validated through experts’ judgement and the reliability was estimated through split-half reliability, which yielded a coefficient of 0.72, indicating that the instrument is reliable. The data collected were analysed using mean, standard deviation and independent samples t-test. The hypotheses were tested at 0.05 level of significance. The study's findings revealed that lecturers believe students have a positive attitude toward lecture attendance; that there is no significant difference in male and female lecturers' perceptions of students' lecture attendance habits; and that students' lecture attendance habits are attributed to completing assignments at the last minute, emergency travels, financial constraints, an unconducive learning environment, the availability of course outline on textbooks, and the availability of course outline on textbooks. The study concluded that school administration should adopt a strategy for assigning marks to students who attend lectures, based on the data.
Article visualizations:
References
Armstrong, J. S. (2012). Natural Learning in Higher Education. Encyclopaedia of the Sciences of Learning.
Bassey, M., (2008). Learning methods in tertiary education. Internal paper Nottingham Regional College of Technology.
Bligh, D. A. (2000). What’s the use of lectures? San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 102
Bliss, J. and Ogborn, J. (eds.) (2007). Students’ Reactions to Undergraduate Science. London: Heinemann.
Bord Altranais (2005). Requirements and Standards for Nurse Registration Education Programmes, 3rd edn, Dublin: An Bord Altranais.
Bourgeois, E., Duke, C., & Guyot, J. L. (1999). The Adult University, Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education.
Cleary-Holdforth, J., (2007). Student non-attendance in higher education A phenomenon of student apathy or poor pedagogy? Level3 – June 2007 – Issue 5
Cohn, E., & Johnson, E. (2006). Class attendance and performance in principles of economics, Education Economics 14 (2): 211–233.
Gump, S. E. (2006). Guess who’s (not) coming to class: students’ attitudes as indicators of attendance, Educational Studies 32 (1): 39–46.
Hawkins, D. I., Best, R. J., & Coney, K. A. (2001). Consumer Behaviour: Building Marketing Strategy, Boston: Irwin McGraw-Hill
Hughes, S. J. (2005). Student attendance during college-based lectures: a pilot study, Nursing Standard 19 (47): 41–49.
Hunter, S., & Tetley, J. (1999). ‘Lectures. Why don’t students attend? Why do students attend?’ Proceedings of HERDSA Annual International Conference held in Melbourne 12–15 July 1999, Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australia, Milperra, NSW.
Kirby, A., & McElroy, B., (2003). The effect of attendance on grade for first year economics students in University College Cork. Economic and Social Review 34: 311–26.
Marks, L. E., & Miller, G. A. (2014). The role of semantic and syntactic constraints in memorisation of English sentences. Journal of verbal learning and verbal behaviour 2014 3(1)
Massingham, P., & Herrington, T. (2006). Does Attendance Matter? An Examination of Student Attitudes, Participation, Performance and Attendance, Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, Vol 3(2) http://ro.uow.edu.au/jutlp/vol3/iss2/3
McCarey, M., Barr, T., & Rattray, J. (2006). Predictors of academic performance in a cohort of pre-registration nursing students, Nurse Education Today 27 (4): 357–364.
Mearman, A., Webber, D. J., Ivlevs, A., Rahman, T., & Pacheco, G. (2012). Understanding student attendance in Business Schools: an exploratory study, Faculty of Business and Law, University of the West of England.
Miller, N., & Dollard, J. (1941). Social Learning and Imitation. New Haven, NJ: Yale University Press.
Murphy, P. A. (2015). Are College Lectures Unfair?". Sunday Review. New York Times.
Newman-Ford, L. E., Fitzgibbon, K., Lloyd, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2008). A large-scale investigation into the relationship between attendance and attainment: A study using an innovative, electronic attendance monitoring system. Studies in Higher Education, 33, 699-717.
Nicholl, H., & Timmins, F. (2005). Programme-related stressors among part-time undergraduate nursing students, Journal of Advanced Nursing 50 (1): 93–100.
Rau, W., & Durand, A. (2000). The academic ethic and college grades: does hard work help students to ‘make the grade’? Sociology of Education, 73(1), 19-38.
Ross, J., & Bruce, C. (2007). Professional development effects on teacher efficacy: Results of randomized field trial. The Journal of Educational Research, 101(1), 50-60.
Sharma, M. D., Mendez, A., & O’Byrne, J. W. (2005). The relationship between attendance in student-centred physics tutorials and performance in university examinations, International Journal of Science Education 27 (11): 1375–1389.
Timmins, F., & Kaliszer, M. (2002). Attitudes to absenteeism among diploma nursing students in Ireland – an exploratory descriptive survey, Nurse Education Today 22 (7): 578–588.
Trotter, E., & Roberts, C. A. (2006). Enhancing the early student experience. Higher Education Research & Development 25: 371–86.
Worthen, M. (2015). Lecture Me. Really. Sunday Review. New York Times. Retrieved 19 October 2015.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


