EXAMINING THE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE OF THE NEWLY UPGRADED RURAL SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN MUMBWA DISTRICT OF CENTRAL PROVINCE, ZAMBIA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v9i6.4352Keywords:
academic performance, upgraded rural secondary schools, teaching environment, secondary education, classroom spaceAbstract
This study examined the academic performance of the newly upgraded rural secondary schools in Mumbwa District of Central Province in Zambia. The study had a total of 90 participants. The study employed both qualitative and quantitative methods as a descriptive survey. Questionnaires and interview schedules were used. The findings of the study revealed that the upgraded rural secondary schools had poor learning and teaching environments due to shortage of classroom space, facilities such as libraries and science laboratories. Apart from that, the study revealed that these rural upgraded secondary schools lacked adequate teaching and learning materials coupled with inadequate and under-qualified teaching staff which contributed greatly to the poor performance of learners in these schools. The study revealed that the academic performance of pupils in the three years was below 50% pass rate. The study recommends that the Ministry of General Education and other stakeholders should build more infrastructure and improve the existing ones in these upgraded rural secondary schools. Apart from that, the Ministry of General Education should provide adequate and prescribed teaching and learning materials to these schools to avoid teaching learners using outdated materials which may be contributing to poor performance. Further, the Ministry of General Education should send more qualified teachers to these upgraded rural secondary schools. This would improve the performance of learners and hence meet the aspiration of the Ministry of General Education for all learners both in urban and rural secondary schools.
Article visualizations:
References
Amato, P. (1987). Children in Australian Families. The Growth of Competence. Sydney Prentice Hall.
Banerjee A., Glewwe P., Powers S., and Wasserman M. (2013). “Expanding Access and Increasing Student Learning in Post-Primary Education in Developing Countries: A Review of the Evidence“ Review Paper. Abdul Latif Jamaal Poverty Action Lab (J-PAL).
Bauch, P. A. (2001). School-community partnerships in rural schools: Leadership, renewal, and a sense of place. Peabody Journal of Education, 76(2), 204-221.
Checkland, P. (1981). Systems Thinking, Systems Practice, Chichester, John Wiley & Sons. UK.
Chipoma C. (2002). “Beyond Participation: Mapping the institutional dimensions of collective action in Zambia” Toronto: University of Toronto
Chipoma C. (2014). “Educational Assessment for Improved Learning Achievement”. Main Consultancy Report Ministry of Education Science Vocational Training and Early Education, (MESVTEE) 2014 Joint Annual Review. Lusaka: Ministry of Education
Department for International Development in Ministry of Education, Science, Vocational Training and Early Education [MESVTEE] (2015). “Education for All 2015 National Review Report: Zambia”. Revised version – originally published in 2014.
ECZ (2013a). “Grade 10 progression statistics – 2013”. Lusaka: ECZ.
ECZ (2013b). “Grade 12 examination statistics – 2013”. Lusaka: ECZ.
ECZ (2013c). “Examinations Performance Review General Performance Analysis – 2013”. Lusaka: ECZ Grouter C (1998) “Social Capital: The Missing Link?” Social Capital Initiative Working Paper No. 3 Washington, DC: The World Bank
Education for All (2015). National Review Report: Zambia.
Flood, R. L. and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Critical Systems Thinking, Chichester: John Wiley
Healey F. H. and De Stefano J. (1997). “Education Reform Support. Volume Three: A framework for making it happen.” Washington, DC: Office of Sustainable Development, Bureau for Africa, USAID.
Herzog, M. & Pittman, R. (2003). The nature of rural schools: Trends, perceptions, and values. Lanham, MD: The Scarecrow Press, Inc.
Horst, M. & Martin, B. (2007). A case study: Leadership and its effect on achievement of children from poverty in a rural setting. The Rural Educator, 28(3), 33-40.
Howley, A., Rhodes, M., & Beall, J. (2009). Challenges facing rural children: Implications for gifted children. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 32(4), 1 – 23
Kabeta et al. (2015). The Effects of Instructional Leadership on the Teaching & Learning Process: The Case of Basic School Head Teachers in Central Province- Zambia
Kasonde, et al. (2009). Impact of Guidance and Counselling Services on High School Pupils in Zambia. Lusaka, Zambia.
Kraft, R. (1998). Rural Educational Reform in the Nueva Escuela Unitaria of Guatemala. Washington, D.C.: Academy for Educational Development.
Lingam, G. I. (2012). Preparing teachers for rural schools: An empirical evidence from a Fiji case. Greener Journal of Educational Research, 2(2), 001-012
Maina, M. J. (2010) Strategies Employed by Secondary School Principals to Improve Academic Performance in Embu West District. Kenyatta University.
Malambo, B. (2012). Factors affecting Pupil Performance in Grant-Aided and Non-grant Aided Secondary Schools: A Case of selected Secondary Schools in the Western Province of Zambia. Lusaka, M.A: The University of Zambia Library.
Mbozi, E. M. (2008). Classroom Factors that affect the Quality of Education in selected Basic Schools in Livingstone and Kazungula Districts in Southern Province of Zambia: Doctorate Dissertation. Lusaka: University of Zambia Library.
Ministry of Education [MOE] (2007a). “National Annual Work Plan and Budget – 2007”. Lusaka: MOE (2007b) “National Implementation Framework 2008-2010”. Lusaka: MOE
Ministry of Education. (1992). Focus On Learning. Lusaka: MOE.
Ministry of Education (2013). Education Curriculum Framework. Lusaka: Curriculum Development Centre.
Ministry of General Education [MOGE] (1996). “Educating Our Future”. Lusaka: Ministry of Education MOGE.
MOGE (2015). “Education budget allocation by spending category”. Lusaka: MOE
Mourshed M., Chijioke C. and Barber M. (2010). “How the world’s most improved school systems keep getting better”. McKinsey
Moulton, J. (2001). Improving Education in Rural Areas: Guidance for Rural Development, Retrieved from http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.197.9341&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Sammons, P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Effective Schools: A Review of School Effectiveness Research. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED389826
Sanoff, H. (2000). Community Participation methods for Designing Responsive Schools. Washington, D.C, National Clearinghouse for Educational Facilities.
White, B. (2000). Dissertation skills for Business and Management Students. Great Britain: Martins the Printers Ltd.
Wiersma, W. (1995). Research methods in education: An introduction (Sixth edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wild L. and Harris D. (2011). “The political economy of community scorecards in Malawi” Overseas Development Institute, UK.
Wild L. and Wales J., with Chambers V. (2015). “CARE's experience with community score cards: what works and why?” London: Overseas Development Institute.
World Bank (1996). “Participation Source Book”. DC: The World Bank.
World Bank (2003). “World Development Report 2004: Making services work for poor people”. Washington, DC.
World Bank (2017). Zambia Education Enhancement Project.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


