CORRELATION OF PRIMARY SCHOOL STUDENTS’ MISCONCEPTIONS ABOUT CONCEPTS OF MECHANICS FROM THEIR MENTAL AGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i1.4619Keywords:
mental age, misconceptions, physics, primary schoolAbstract
This paper presents the results of empirical research conducted on students in the sixth grade of Primary School, misconceptions on concepts of mechanics of Physis, and their mental age. The mental age was determined by the WISC-III psychometric tool that is used to determine the Intelligence Quotient (IQ). The results of this study give a linear relationship between mental age and the number of correct answers given by a student. The meaning of this linear dependence is that the higher the mental age a student has, the more correctly he can perceive some physical phenomena related to concepts of force, weight, energy, work, etc. Also, the influence of the verbal and performance scale on the mental age of WISC-III is discussed in the results.
Article visualizations:
References
Brown, D. (1989). Students’ concept of force: the importance of understanding Newton’s third law, Physics Education, 24, 353.
Clement, J. (1982). Students’ preconceptions in introductory mechanics, American Journal of Physics, 50(1), 66-71
Georgas, D., Paraskevopoulos Ι., Mpezevegkis, H, & Giannitsas N. D. (1997). Ελληνικό WISC-III: Οδηγός εξεταστή, Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα, (Greek WISC-III: Examiner's Guide), (In Greek).
Driver, R. (1984). Cognitive psychology and pupil’s frameworks in mechanics, in Lijnse, P. (ed.), The many faces of teaching and learning mechanics in secondary end early tertiary education, Proceedings of the conference on physics education, August, Utrecht; GIPERS/SVO/UNESCO, WCC, Utrecht, 1985, 227.
Goldring, H., and Osborne, J. (1994). Students’ difficulties with energy and related concepts, Physics Education, 29, 26-32.
Halloun, I. A. and Hestenes, D. (1985b). Common sense concepts about motion, American Journal of Physics, 53(11), 1056-1065.
Kaufman, A. S. (1994). Intelligent testing with the WISC-III, New York: Wiley
Kotsis K. T. (2011), Ερευνητική Προσέγγιση του διαχρονικού χαρακτήρα των εναλλακτικών ιδεών στη διδακτική της φυσικής, Εκδόσεις Πανεπιστημίου Ιωαννίνων, Ιωάννινα. Empirical Research to the timeless character of alternative ideas in the Didactics of Physics, Book, University of Ioannina, (In Greek).
Kotsis K. T. and Kolovos C. (2002). Οι εναλλακτικές αντιλήψεις των παιδιών, η εννοιολογική αλλαγή και η διάρκεια γνώσης από την διδασκαλία στο ∆ηµοτικό στην έννοια της δύναμης, στο Μαργετουσάκη Αθ. &. Μιχαηλίδης Π.Γ (επ.) Πρακτικά 3ου Πανελλήνιου Συνεδρίου για την «Διδακτική των Φυσικών Επιστημών και των Νέων Τεχνολογιών στην Εκπαίδευση», Ρέθυμνο, 250-256. Children's alternative perceptions, conceptual change, and duration of knowledge from primary school teaching in the concept of power, Proceeding of the 3rd Conference for Didactics of Sciences and New Technologies in Education. (In Greek)
Kotsis K. T. and Vemis K. (2002). Οι εναλλακτικές αντιλήψεις των παιδιών, η εννοιολογική αλλαγή και η διάρκεια γνώσης από την διδασκαλία στο ∆ηµοτικό για φαινόμενα που στηρίζονται στον τρίτο νόμο του Νεύτωνα, στο Μαργετουσάκη Αθ. &. Μιχαηλίδης Π.Γ (επ.) Πρακτικά 3ου Πανελλήνιου Συνεδρίου για την «Διδακτική των Φυσικών Επιστημών και των Νέων Τεχνολογιών στην Εκπαίδευση», Ρέθυμνο, 257-262. Children's alternative perceptions, conceptual change, and duration of knowledge from primary school teaching about phenomena based on Newton's third law, Proceeding of the 3rd Conference for Didactics of Sciences and New Technologies in Education. (In Greek)
Lawson, R. A. and McDermott, L. C. (1987). Student understanding of the work-energy and impulse-momentum theorems, American Journal of Physics, 55(7), 811-817.
Lombardi, O. (1999). Aristotelian Physics in the Context of Teaching Science: A Historical-Philosophical Approach, Science and Education, 8(3), 217
Motti-Stefanidi F. (1999). Αξιολόγηση της Νοημοσύνης παιδιών σχολικής ηλικίας και εφήβων. Εγχειρίδιο για ψυχολόγους. Αθήνα: Ελληνικά Γράμματα. Assessment of the Intelligence of school children and adolescents. Handbook for psychologists. Book, Athens, (In Greek)
Mullet, E., and Gervais H. (1990). Distinction between the concepts of weight and mass in high school students, International Journal of Science Education, 12(2), 217-226
Neisser, U., Boodo, G., Bouchard, T. J., Jr., Boykin, A. W., Brody, N., Ceci, S. J., Halpern, D. F., Loehlin, J. C., Perloff, R., Sternberg, R. J. & Urbina, S. (1996). Νοημοσύνη: Τι είναι γνωστό και τι δεν είναι, (Επιμέλεια ελληνικής μετάφρασης, Α. Ευκλείδη 1997). Ψυχολογία, 4 (1), 48-93
Osborne, R. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (1979). Investigating Student Understanding of Basic Physics Concepts Using an Interview-About-Instances Technique, Research in Science Education, 9, 85-93.
Roggerio, S, Cartielli, A., Dupre, F. and Vicentini-Missoni, M. (1985). Weight, gravity and air pressure; mental representations by Italian middle-school pupils, European Journal of Science Education 7(2), 181–194.
Sjobery S. and Lie S. (1981). Ideas about force and movement among Norwegian pupils and students, Institute of Physics Report Series: Report 81-11, University of Oslo.
Stead K. and Osborne R. (1980). Gravity, LISP Working Paper 20, Science Education Research Unit, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
Tao, P. K., & Gunstone, R. F. (1999). A process of conceptual change in force and motion during computer-supported Physics instruction, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 859-882.
Watts D. M. (1982). Gravity – don’t take it for granted! Physics Education, 17, 116–121.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


