ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN MOROCCO: THE STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v11i11.5615Keywords:
assessment practices, formative assessment, higher education, student-centered learningAbstract
Assessment for learning has been a topic of study for decades, with a focus on how learners can benefit from the tests they take. The major issue with this type of assessment is its implementation. This article investigates the benefits of assessment for Moroccan university learners. 1148 of these learners filled out a questionnaire that included questions about the fundamentals of assessment and how it can serve learning purposes. The findings show that although the majority of the learners report that their tests meet the requirements of good tests, some students still doubt this. They also show some good practices of alternative assessment and feedback. However, there is still room for improvement as some students do not benefit from the assessments they take.
Article visualizations:
References
Allal, L. (2016). The co-regulation of student learning in an assessment for learning culture. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 259–273). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_15
Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2016). The role of classroom assessment in supporting self-regulated learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 293–309). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_17
Baghit, R., Erguig, R., & Boudlal, A. (2024). Moroccan graduate EFL students’ perceptions of online assessment: Benefits and challenges. Journal of Applied Language and Culture Studies, 7(2), 23–40. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382360777_Moroccan_Graduate_EFL_Students'_Perceptions_of_Online_Assessment_Benefits_and_Challenges
Birenbaum, M. (2016). Assessment culture versus testing culture: The impact on assessment for learning. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 275–292). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_16
Bouziane, A. (2017). Why should the assessment of literacy in Morocco be revisited? In S. Hidri & C. Coombe (Eds.), Evaluation in Foreign Language Education in the Middle East and North Africa (pp. 305–314). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-43234-2_18
Gulikers, J. T. M., Bastiaens, T. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2004). A five-dimensional framework for authentic assessment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 52(3), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02504676
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hayward, L., Higgins, S., Livingston, K., Wyse, D., & Spencer, E. (2014). Special issue on assessment for learning. The Curriculum Journal, 25(4), 465–469. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2014.981381
Kasmi, H., & Anasse, K. (2023). The status of alternative assessment in Morocco: Teachers’ attitudes and obstacles. International Journal of Language and Literary Studies, 5(1), 300–311. https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v5i1.1189
Laveault, D., & Allal, L. (2016). Implementing assessment for learning: Theoretical and practical issues. In D. Laveault & L. Allal (Eds.), Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation (Vol. 4, pp. 1–18). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_1
MoHE. (2023). L’enseignement supérieur en chiffres: 2022-2023. Direction des Stratégies et des Systèmes d’Information.
National Assessment Panel. (2018). Higher education in Morocco: Effectiveness, efficiency, and challenges of the open access university system [Sector Report]. https://www.csefrs.ma/publications/lenseignement-superieur-au-maroc/?lang=fr
Popham, W. J. (2011). Assessment literacy overlooked: A teacher educator’s confession. The Teacher Educator, 46(4), 265–273. https://doi.org/10.1080/08878730.2011.605048
Popham, W. J. (2018). Assessment literacy for educators in a hurry. ASCD. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED586055
Rahhou, J. (2022, October 24). High-stakes exams ‘do little’ to improve education in Morocco. https://www.moroccoworldnews.com/2022/10/352016/high-stakes-exams-do-little-to-improve-education-in-morocco
St-Amand, J., Rasmy, A., Nabil, A., & Courdi, C. (2022). Improving the effectiveness of teacher assessment in higher education: A case study of professors’ perceptions in Morocco. Discover Education, 1(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44217-022-00021-y
The Manitoba project. (2006). Rethinking classroom assessment with purpose in mind: Assessment for learning, assessment as learning, assessment of learning (Manitoba Education, Citizenship and Youth). https://www.edu.gov.mb.ca/k12/assess/wncp/full_doc.pdf
Wiggins, G. (1990). The case for authentic assessment. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.7275/FFB1-MM19
Wiliam, D. (2018). Assessment for learning: Meeting the challenge of implementation. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 25(6), 682–685. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1401526
Yazidi, R. E. (2023). Investigating the influence of formative assessment on the learning process in the English language classroom. Asian Journal of Education and Training, 9(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.20448/edu.v9i1.4540
Zaibout, N., Laafou, M., & Madrane, M. (2024). Assessment practices of learning outcomes in digital learning environments. 16(2), 82–89. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/382689753_ASSESSMENT_PRACTICES_OF_LEARNING_OUTCOMES_IN_DIGITAL_LEARNING_ENVIRONMENTS
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


