EVALUATING THE RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY OF THE BURNOUT ASSESSMENT TOOL (BAT) TO TEACHERS IN CREECE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i12.6442Keywords:
Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), validity, reliability, burnout, teachers, GreeceAbstract
This study examines the validity and reliability of the Greek adaptation of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT), the most recently developed and updated burnout measurement tool (2019-20), in primary and secondary school teachers. Burnout has been a serious issue in the field of education in recent years, and especially after the COVID-19 pandemic, as teachers face high demands and limited support resources, resulting in symptoms such as physical and mental exhaustion, distancing, cognitive and emotional impairment. The survey involved 1,044 teachers from all over Greece, who responded electronically to BAT. Data analysis was performed by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA, CFA) using SPSS 29 and SmartPLS 4 software, in the context of PLS-SEM and CB-SEM. The results showed that BAT maintains its original six-factor structure (exhaustion, mental distance, cognitive impairment, emotional impairment, psychological and psychosomatic complaints) with high loads (>0.615) and very good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha of 0.794 to 0.934). Convergent and discrete validity were confirmed, while the model showed good fit (SRMR=0.06). The consistency of the results between the PLS-SEM analysis and the CB-SEM confirmation significantly enhances the validity of the Greek adaptation of the BAT. The tool proves to be reliable, stable and theoretically consistent, as its exgenerative structure remains unchanged and clearly conveys the real experience of burnout in the field of education. At the same time, the existence of the general factor G-BAT provides the possibility to calculate an overall burnout index, which can be useful for comparative or longitudinal studies. The findings support that BAT is a reliable and valid tool for measuring burnout in Greek teachers, offering the possibility of targeted prevention and support interventions. At the same time, research limitations are recognized, such as the self-selection of the sample and the absence of repeat measurement control, which indicate the need for further research.
Article visualizations:
References
Agyapong, B. O., Obuobi Donkor, G., Burback, L., & Wei, Y. (2022). Stress, burnout, anxiety and depression among teachers: A scoping review. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191710706
Aloe, A. M., Amo, L. C., & Shanahan, M. E. (2014). Classroom management self efficacy and burnout: A multivariate meta analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 101–126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-013-9244-0
Androulakis, G. S., Georgiou, D. A., Lainidi, O., Montgomery, A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2023). The Greek Burnout Assessment Tool: Examining its adaptation and validity. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 20(10), 5827. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20105827
Angelini, G., Buonomo, I., Benevene, P., Consiglio, P., Romano, L., & Fiorilli, C. (2021). The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): A contribution to Italian validation with teachers. Sustainability, 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169065
Antoniou, A. S., Polychroni, F., & Vlachakis, A. N. (2006). Gender and age differences in occupational stress and professional burnout among primary and high-school teachers in Greece. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 682–690. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940610690213
Babbie, E. R. (2013). The Practice of Social Research (13th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Practice_of_Social_Research.html?id=af9OpwAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Basinska, B. A., Gruszczynska, E., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Polish adaptation of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-PL) by Schaufeli et al. [in Polish]. Psychiatria Polska, 55(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/141563
Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186–3191. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200012150-00014
Bonett, D. G. (2002). Sample size requirements for testing and estimating coefficient alpha. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27(4), 335–340. https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986027004335
Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/135910457000100301
Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Social_Research_Methods.html?id=vCq5m2hPkOMC&redir_esc=y
Cho, S. H. (2020). Preliminary study for the validation of the Korean version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (K-BAT). Korean Journal of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 33(4), 461–499. https://doi.org/10.24230/kjiop.v33i4.461-499
Chryssouli, E., & Koutroukis, T. (2023). A comparative study of burnout among several teachers’ specializations in secondary schools of Thessaloniki. Merits, 3(3), 478–493. https://doi.org/10.3390/merits3030028
Consiglio, C., Mazzetti, G., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(18). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18189469
Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/A_First_Course_in_Factor_Analysis.html?id=RSsVAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Costello, A. B., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 10(1), 7. https://doi.org/10.7275/jyj1-4868
de Beer, L. T., Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., Hakanen, J. J., Shimazu, A., Glaser, J., Seubert, C., Bosak, J., Sinval, J., & Rudnev, M. (2020). Measurement invariance of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) across seven cross-national representative samples. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5604. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155604
De Beer, L. T., Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., Hakanen, J. J., Kaltiainen, J., Glaser, J., Seubert, C., Shimazu, A., Bosak, J., Procházka, J., Kajzar, A., & Christensen, M. (2024). Revisiting a global burnout score with the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) across nine country samples. European Journal of Psychological Assessment. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000839
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Nachreiner, F., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2001). The job demands-resources model of burnout. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 499–512. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.499
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027//1015-5759.19.1.12
Demerouti, E., & Bakker, A. B. (2008). The Oldenburg Burnout Inventory: A Good Alternative to Measure Burnout and Engagement. In Handbook of Stress and Burnout in Health Care (pp. 65-78). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/46704152_The_Oldenburg_Burnout_Inventory_A_good_alternative_to_measure_burnout_and_engagement
Ederio, N. T., Inocian, E. P., Calaca, N. I., & Espiritu, J. G. M. (2023). Ethical research practices in educational institutions: A literature review. International Journal of Current Science Research and Review, 6(5), 2709–2724. https://doi.org/10.47191/ijcsrr/V6-i5-02
ELSTAT. (2025a, February 7). Surveys on pre-primary and primary education (kindergartens and primary schools) – End of school year 2022/2023. Piraeus: Hellenic Republic.
ELSTAT. (2025b, February 7). Surveys on Secondary Education (Gymnasia and Lykeia) – End of school year 2022/2023 [Statistical report]. Hellenic Statistical Authority. https://www.statistics.gr/documents/20181/18539672/DT_gymnasia_lykeia_2022-2023_gr.pdf
Field, A. P. (2018) Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. 5th Edition, Sage, Newbury Park.
Flook, L., Goldberg, S. B., Pinger, L., Bonus, K., & Davidson, R. J. (2013). Mindfulness for teachers: A pilot study to assess effects on stress, burnout, and teaching efficacy. Mind, Brain, and Education, 7(3), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12026
Franke, G., & Sarstedt, M. (2019). Heuristics versus statistics in discriminant validity testing: a comparison of four procedures. Internet Research, 29(3), 430–457. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-12-2017-0515
Hadžibajramović, E., Schaufeli, W. B., & De Witte, H. (2024). The ultra-short version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT4): Development, validation, and measurement invariance across countries, age, and gender. PLOS ONE, 19(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297843
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Education. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Multivariate_Data_Analysis.html?id=0R9ZswEACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2021). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/A_Primer_on_Partial_Least_Squares_Struct.html?hl=id&id=AVMzEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Hakanen, J. J., Bakker, A. B., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2006). Burnout and work engagement among teachers. Journal of School Psychology, 43(6), 495–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.11.001
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Demerouti, E. (2005). The construct validity of an alternative measure of burnout: Investigating the English translation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 19(3), 208–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500340728
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30(2), 179–185. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02289447
Gaire, B. R. (2024). Sources of teachers’ occupational stress and effects on their self-efficacy. Vox Batauli, 9, 11–23. https://doi.org/10.3126/vb.v9i01.70396
Gkontelos, A., Vaiopoulou, J., & Stamovlasis, D. (2023). Burnout of Greek teachers: Measurement invariance and differences across individual characteristics. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13(6), 1029–1042. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13060079
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Kang, E., & Hwang, H.-J. (2023). The importance of anonymity and confidentiality for conducting survey research. Journal of Research and Publication Ethics, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.15722/jrpe.4.1.202303.1
Kantas, A., & Vassilaki, E. (1997). Research note: Burnout in Greek teachers: Main findings and validity of the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Work & Stress, 11(1), 94–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678379708256826
Kaschka, W. P., Korczak, D., & Broich, K. (2011). Burnout: A fashionable diagnosis. Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, 108(46), 781–787. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2011.0781
Kisaakye, V., Njora, H., & Wodon, Q. (2024). Teacher burnout and the importance of mental health and psycho-social support in Africa. UNESCO IICBA
Klassen, R. M. (2010). Teacher stress: The mediating role of collective efficacy beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research, 103(5), 342–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903383069
Koçak, Ö. E., Gençay, O., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2022). BAT-TR: Tükenmişlik Ölçme Aracı’nın (BAT) Türkçeye uyarlanması [BAT-TR: Turkish adaptation of Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)]. Psikoloji Çalışmaları - Studies in Psychology, 42(3), 509–549. https://doi.org/10.26650/SP2020-799817
Kokkinos, C. M. (2006). Factor Structure and Psychometric Properties of the Maslach Burnout Inventory-Educators Survey among Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in Cyprus. Stress and Health, 22, 25-33. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.1079
Kristensen, T. S., Borritz, M., Villadsen, E., & Christensen, K. B. (2005). The Copenhagen Burnout Inventory: A new tool for the assessment of burnout. Work & Stress, 19(3), 192–207 https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500297720
Kyriacou, C. (1987). Teacher Stress and Burnout: An International Review. Educational Research, 29, 146-152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0013188870290207
Lazauskaitė-Zabielskė, J., Žiedelis, A., Jakštienė, R., Urbanavičiūtė, I., & De Witte, H. (2023). The Lithuanian version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT-LT): Psychometric characteristics of the primary and secondary symptoms scales. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1287368
Leiter, M. P., & Maslach, C. (2016). Latent burnout profiles: A new approach to understanding the burnout experience. Burnout Research, 3(4), 89–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2016.09.001
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., & Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36(4), 611–637. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr3604_06
Mahadi, N. F., Chin, R. W. A., Chua, Y. Y., Chu, M. N., Wong, M. S., Yusoff, M. S. B., & Lee, Y. Y. (2018). Malay language translation and validation of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory measuring burnout. Education in Medicine Journal, 10(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.21315/eimj2018.10.2.4
Márquez Lugo, I., Mosquera-Quiñónez, M., Ochoa-Granados, C., Pacavita-Sánchez, D., Palencia-Sánchez, F., & Riaño-Casallas, M. (2021). Revisión de los instrumentos de medición del síndrome de burnout - Documento de trabajo (Instruments for Measuring Burnout Syndrome: A Review - Working Paper). SSRN. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3841093
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981). The measurement of experienced burnout. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2(2), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030020205
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1996). Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual (3rd ed.). Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/277816643_The_Maslach_Burnout_Inventory_Manual
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001). Job burnout. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 397-422. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
Meimeti, E., & Moisoglou, I. (2019). Burnout syndrome in professionals employed in special education schools. Hellenic Journal of Nursing Science, 12(3), 44–52. https://doi.org/10.24283/hjns.2019.3.5
Nguyen, C. H. (2007). Email surveys in educational research: Ethical surveys in educational research. Essays in Education, 21(1), Article 2. https://openriver.winona.edu/eie/vol21/iss1/2
Nithavrianaki, A., & Papadouris, P. (2020). Relationship between self-efficacy and professional burnout in special education staff. Epistimes Agogis [Educational Sciences], (3), 93–112.
Ntavlamanou, M. J. (2024). Occupational burnout of Greek primary education teachers. European Journal of Education and Pedagogy, 5(6), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.24018/ejedu.2024.5.6.893
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Piperac, P., Todorovic, J., Terzic-Supic, Z., Maksimovic, A., Karic, S., Pilipovic, F., & Soldatovic, I. (2021). The Validity and Reliability of the Copenhagen Burnout Inventory for Examination of Burnout among Preschool Teachers in Serbia. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(13), 6805. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136805
Platsidou, M. (2010). Trait Emotional Intelligence of Greek Special Education Teachers in Relation to Burnout and Job Satisfaction. School Psychology International, 31(1), 60-76. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034309360436
Platsidou, M., & Daniilidou, A. (2016a). Teacher burnout and job satisfaction: The mediating role of emotional intelligence. European Journal of Counselling Psychology, 5(1), 31–50. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejcop.v5i1.93
Platsidou, M., & Daniilidou, A. (2016b). Three scales to measure burnout of primary school teachers: Empirical evidence on their adequacy. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 5(2), 164–186. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2016.1810
Ramírez Angel, L. M. (2025). Cultural adaptation and validation into Spanish of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) in university professors in Colombia. International Journal of Psychological Research, 18(1), 39–49. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.7043
Redelinghuys, K., & Morgan, B. (2023). Psychometric properties of the Burnout Assessment Tool across four countries. BMC Public Health, 23(1), 824. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-023-15604-z
Reis, D., Xanthopoulou, D., & Tsaousis, I. (2015). Measuring job and academic burnout with the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI): Factorial invariance across samples and countries. Burnout Research, 2(1), 8–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.burn.2014.11.001
Sakakibara, K., Shimazu, A., Toyama, H., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2020). Validation of the Japanese version of the Burnout Assessment Tool. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1819. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01819
Sarstedt, M., Hair, J. F., Ringle, C. M., Thiele, K. O., & Gudergan, S. P. (2014). Estimation issues with PLS and CBSEM: where the bias lies! Journal of Business Research, 67(9), 1795–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.06.007
Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., & Desart, S. (2020a). User Manual – Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT) – Version 2.0. KU Leuven, Belgium: Internal report. Retrieved from https://burnoutassessmenttool.be/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/User-Manual-BAT-version-2.0.pdf
Schaufeli, W. B., Desart, S., & De Witte, H. (2020b). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT)—Development, validity, and reliability. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9495. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249495
Schaufeli, W. B., & De Witte, H. (2023). A fresh look at burnout: The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT). In C. U. Krägeloh et al. (eds), International Handbook of Behavioral Health Assessment (cap. 54). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89738-3_54-1
Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., Desart, S., De Cuyper, N., Gülova, A. A., Hakanen, J. J., Kubicek, B., Mauno, S., Salanova, M., Shimazu, A., Van den Broeck, A., & Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M. (2023). The Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Cross-national measurement invariance across seven countries and implications for its use in international research. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 39(2), 120–134. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759/a000757
Schaufeli, W. B., & Taris, T. W. (2005). The conceptualization and measurement of burnout: Common ground and worlds apart. Work & Stress, 19(3), 256–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678370500385913
Scherzinger, M., & Wettstein, A. (2019). Classroom disruptions, the teacher–student relationship and classroom management from the perspective of teachers, students and external observers: A multimethod approach. Learning Environments Research, 22(1), 101–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-018-9269-x
Sinval, J., Vazquez, A. C. S., Hutz, C. S., Schaufeli, W. B., & Silva, S. (2022). Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Validity evidence from Brazil and Portugal. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(3), 1344. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19031344
Skaalvik, E.M. and Skaalvik, S. (2020) Teacher Burnout: Relations between Dimensions of Burnout, Perceived School Context, Job Satisfaction and Motivation for Teaching. A Longitudinal Study. Teachers and Teaching, 26, 602-616. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2021.1913404
Sourlou, E. (2024). Teacher burnout in Greece: An investigation using the OLBI scale [Master’s thesis, University of Patras].
Stevens, J. P. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences (4th ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2001-18534-000
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2
Van Royen, A., Wante, L., & Braet, C. (2024). A validation of the Flemish School Burnout Assessment Tool for students between 17 and 21 years old (FS-BAT). Mental Health & Prevention. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mhp.2024.200374
Vinueza-Solórzano, A. M., Portalanza-Chavarría, C. A., de Freitas, C. P. P., Schaufeli, W. B., De Witte, H., Hutz, C. S., & Souza Vazquez, A. C. (2021). The Ecuadorian version of the Burnout Assessment Tool (BAT): Adaptation and validation. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 7121. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18137121
von der Embse, N., Ryan, S. V., Gibbs, T., & Mankin, A. (2019). Teacher stress interventions: A systematic review. Psychology in the Schools, 56(8), 1328–1343. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.22279
Wheeler, D. L., Vassar, M., Worley, J. A., & Barnes, L. L. B. (2011). A reliability generalization meta-analysis of coefficient alpha for the Maslach Burnout Inventory. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 71(1), 231–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410391579
WHO. (2018). Process of translation and adaptation of instruments. Geneva: World Health Organization 2016.
WHO. (2019). Burn-out an occupational phenomenon: International Classification of Diseases. WHO. https://www.who.int/mental_health/evidence/burn-out/en/
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample size requirements for structural equation models. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Zogopoulos, K., & Mpantouna, M. (2020). Evaluation of the factorial structure of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory (OLBI) research tool in the field of education in Greece. Educational Circle, 8(3), 303–325. Retrieved from https://educircle.gr/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/teyxos_8_3_19.pdf
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


