LEARNING REFLECTIONS ON COURSE WORK AS A DOCTORAL SCHOLAR
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v10i1.4643کلمات کلیدی:
assessment of course work, DSc Program, supervisory practicesچکیده
In all fields of life science, research is a feeder system that provides essential knowledge, skill, and innovation. A six-month course of study that is required of all research scholars has been proposed and enacted due to research developments and quality improvements in doctoral research programs. The majority of difficulties were experienced during the thesis writing, viva, and correction phases of their research; nonetheless, better postgraduate centers and more accommodating financial aid policies are still required to foster inclusive learning environments for postgraduates. In order to meet the various requirements and expectations of full-time and distance-learning doctorate students, it is crucial for supervisors to be knowledgeable about a variety of postgraduate supervising methodologies. This research paper aims to study the scholar’s perception of the coursework and assessment during the first year of doctoral study.
Article visualizations:
مراجع
Airasian, P. W., & Madaus, G. F. (1972). Functional types of student evaluation. Measurement and Evaluation in Guidance, 4(4), 221-233.
Assessment. https://www.edglossary.org/assessment/2015.
Bell, C., & Harris, D. (2013). Evaluating and assessing for learning. Routledge.
Boud, D. (1986). Facilitating learning in continuing education: Some important sources. Studies in Higher Education, 11(3), 237-243.
Boud, D., & Brew, A. (1995). Developing a typology for learner self-assessment practices. Research and development in Higher Education, 18(1), 130-135.
Brew, A. (1999). Research and teaching: Changing relationships in a changing context. Studies in higher education, 24(3), 291-301.
Carver, S. M., Lehrer, R., Connell, T., & Erickson, J. (1992). Learning by hypermedia design: Issues of assessment and implementation. Educational Psychologist, 27(3), 385-404.
Galton, F. (1889). Natural inheritance. Macmillan and Company.
Katuu, S. (2019, June). The utility of visual methods in the research odyssey. In 18th European Conference on Research Methodology for Business and Management Studies (p. 164). University of Witwatersrand, South Africa: Academic Conferences and Publishing International.
Krauss, S. E., & Ismail, I. A. (2010). PhD Students' Experiences of Thesis Supervision in Malaysia: Managing Relationships in the Midst of Institutional Change. Qualitative Report, 15(4), 802-822.
Leach, L., Neutze, G., & Zepke, N. (2001). Assessment and empowerment: Some critical questions. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(4), 293-305.
Macfarlane, B. (2004). Teaching with integrity: The ethics of higher education practice. Routledge.
Messick, S. (1989). Meaning and values in test validation: The science and ethics of assessment. Educational researcher, 18(2), 5-11.
Moss, P. A. (1992). Shifting conceptions of validity in educational measurement: Implications for performance assessment. Review of educational research, 62(3), 229-258.
Moss, P. A. (1994). Can there be validity without reliability?. Educational researcher, 23(2), 5-12.
Shepard, L. A. (1993). Chapter 9: Evaluating test validity. Review of research in education, 19(1), 405-450.
Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. Y., & Yunus, F. W. (2013). Postgraduate supervision: Exploring Malaysian students’ experiences. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 133-141.
Sidhu, G. K., Kaur, S., Fook, C. Y., & Yunus, F. W. (2014). Postgraduate supervision: Comparing student perspectives from Malaysia and the United Kingdom. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 151-159.
Taylor, C. (1994). Assessment for measurement or standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 231-262.
Walton, H. (1997). Small group methods in medical teaching. Medical education, 31(6), 459-464.
Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity?. Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24-37.
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


