A TEST OF THE MEDIATING EFFECT OF PERSONALITY PREDICTORS ON THE SEXTING ATTITUDE AND VICTIMIZATION OF ADOLESCENTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v12i11.6319کلمات کلیدی:
criminal justice, personality predictors, sexting attitude victimization, adolescents, mediation analysisچکیده
Technology is positively aiding the world in its fast-paced thriving existence, but there is a negative side concerning technology, wherein malicious individuals are using it to draw emotions from others, including adolescents. The study intended to determine the mediating effect of personality predictors on the relationship between sexting attitude and victimization among adolescents. Adapted questionnaires were disseminated among the 500 adolescent respondents with consent from their respective parents. Data gathered was treated with statistical tools such as Mean, Pearson product-moment, Medgraph using the Sobel z-test, Regression, and Mediation Test Technique. The result of the study disclosed the following: The level of sexting attitude among adolescents is moderate; the level of victimization is low; while the level of personality predictors is high. There is also a significant relationship between the sexting attitude and personality predictors; there is no significant relationship between personality predictors and victimization; while there is a significant relationship between sexting attitude and victimization among adolescents. Results revealed no mediating effect of personality predictors on the relationship between sexting attitude and victimization among adolescents. This implies that personality predictors have nothing to do with victimization of adolescents, but sexting attitude does, which means the latter must be modified from among adolescents to prevent harm among the children.
Article visualizations:
مراجع
Afrouz, R. (2023). The nature, patterns, and consequences of technology-facilitated domestic abuse: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 24(2), 913–927. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380211046752
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50 (2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Allport, G.W. (1937). Personality: A psychological interpretation. Holt. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1938-01964-000
Amir, F., Naz, F., Shafeez, S.Q., Ashfaq, A. & Dogar, Y.H. (2014). Measuring the effect of five five-factor model of personality on team performance with moderating role of employee engagement. Journal of Psychology and Behavioral Science, 2(2), 221-255. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/354776610_Measureing_the_Effect_of_Five_Factor_Model_of_Personality_on_Team_Performance_with_Moderating_Role_of_employee_engagement
Buelga, S., Cava, M., Ruiz, D., & Ortega-Baron, J. (2022). Cyberbullying and suicidal behavior in adolescent students: A systematic review. Revista de Educación, 397(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.4438/1988-592X-RE-2022-397-539
Cattell, R.B. (1950) Personality: A systematic, theoretical and factual study, 1st ed. McGraw-Hill. https://doi.org/10.1037/10773-000
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://eli.johogo.com/Class/CCU/SEM/_Applied%20Multiple%20Regression-Correlation%20Analysis%20for%20the%20Behavioral%20Sciences_Cohen.pdf
Coyne, I. T. (1997). Sampling in qualitative research. Purposeful and theoretical sampling; merging or clear boundaries? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 26(1), 623-630. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1997.t01-25-00999.x
Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. London: Sage Publications, Inc
Cuadrado, D., Salgado, J. F., & Moscoso, S. (2020). Personality, intelligence, and counterproductive academic behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Advance online publication. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000285
Dennehy, R., Meaney, S., Cronin, M., & Arensman, E. (2020). The psychological impacts of cybervictimisation and barriers to seeking social support: Young people’s perspective. Children and Youth Services Review, 111(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.104872
Eysenck, H.J. (1953). The structure of human personality. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203753439
Finkelhor, D., Walsh, K., Jones, L., Mitchell, K., & Collier, A. (2021). Youth internet safety education: Aligning programs with the evidence base. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 22(5), 1233–1247. https://doi/org/10.1177/1524838020916257
Fissel, E. R. (2021). The reporting and help-seeking behaviors of cyberstalking victims. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(12), 5075–5100. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518801942
Gámez-Guadix, M,.Almendros, C., Borrajo, E., & Calvete, E. (2015). Prevalence and association of sexting and online sexual victimization among Spanish adults Sexuality Research and Social Policy, 12(1), 5-6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13178-015-0186-9
Gámez-Guadix, M. & Mateos-Pérez, E. (2019). Longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between sexting, online sexual solicitations, and cyberbullying among minors. Computers in Human Behavior. 94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004
Gámez-Guadix, M. Mateos-Pérez E. (2020). Longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between sexting, online sexual solicitations, and cyberbullying among minors. Computers in Human Behavior, 94 (2019), pp. 70-76, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.01.004
Gasso, A.M., Mueller-Johnson, K., & Montiel, I. (2020). Sexting, Online Sexual Victimization, and Psychopathology Correlates by Sex: Depression, Anxiety, and Global Psychopathology. International Journal of Environmental Research of Public Health, 17(1), 10-18. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17031018
Gottfredson, M.R. & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1990-97753-000
Kalaitzaki, A. (2020). Cyberstalking victimization and perpetration among young adults: Prevalence and correlates. In S. J. Thompson (Ed.), Advances in human and social aspects of technology (pp. 22–38). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-1063-6.ch002.
Kaur, P., Dhir, A., Tandon, A., Alzeiby, E., & Abohassen, A. (2021). A systematic literature review on cyberstalking: An analysis of past achievements and future promises. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 163(1). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120426
Kelland, M.D. (2020). Allport's psychology of personality. https://socialsci.libretexts.org/Bookshelves/Psychology/Boo%3A_Personality_Theory_in_a_Cultural_Context_(Kelland)/10%3A_Trait_Theories_of_Personality/10.03%3A_Allport's_Psychology_of_Personality
Lee, S. D., Kuncel, N. R., & Gau, J. (2020). Personality, attitude, and demographic correlated of academic dishonesty: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 146(11), 1042-1058. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000300
Longobardi, C., Fabris, M. A., Prino, L. E., & Settanni, M. (2021). The role of body image concerns in online sexual victimization among female adolescents: The mediating effect of risky online behaviors, Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma 14, 51–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40653-020-00301-5
MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to statistical mediation analysis. New York: Erlbaum. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809556
Setty, E. (2021). Frexting’: Exploring homosociality among girls who share intimate images. Journal of Youth Studies (2021), https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2021.1923675
Smith, K., & Dhillon, G. (2022). Re-framing the policy conversation for preventing cyberstalking. Internet Research, 33(1), 84–123. https://doi.org/10.1108/INTR-03-2021-0169
Stevens, F., Nurse, J., & Arief, B. (2021). Cyber stalking, cyber harassment, and adult mental health: A systematic review. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 24(6), 367–376. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2020.0253
Van Ouytsel, J. Van Ouytsel, N.M. Punyanunt-Carter, M. Walrave, K. Ponnet (2020). Sexting within young adults' dating and romantic relationships. Current Opinions in Psychology, 36, pp. 55-59, 10.1016/j.copsyc.2020.04.007
Westphal, A., Vock, M., & Lazarides, R. (2020). Are more conscientious seventh- and ninth graders less likely to be retained? Effects of Big Five personality traits on grade retention. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 66(1), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2019.101088
Wilson, C., Sheridan, L., & Garratt-Reed, D. (2023). Examining cyberstalking perpetration and victimization: A scoping review. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 24(3), 2019–2033. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221082937
York, L. York, A., MacKenzie, Purdy, N. (2021). Attitudes to sexting amongst post-primary pupils in Northern Ireland: A liberal feminist approach. Gender and Education, 33 (8) (2021), pp. 999-1016, 10.1080/09540253.2021.1884196
Zhu, C., Huang, S., Evans, R., & Zhang, W. (2021). Cyberbullying among adolescents and children: A comprehensive review of the global situation, risk factors, and prevalence measures. Frontiers in Public Health, 11(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2021.634909
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
