ANALYSIS OF THE SOURCES OF DIFFICULTIES EXPERIENCED BY UNIVERSITY STUDENTS IN LEARNING A FOREIGN LANGUAGE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i8.6992کلمات کلیدی:
difficulties in learning a foreign language, language learning anxiety, university students, psychometricsچکیده
Background and Objectives: In this study, the difficulties that 114 university students (Male n = 47, Female n = 67) enrolled in various departments experienced in learning a foreign language were examined using a four-factor scale. Materials and Methods: The data were collected through an online survey conducted via the Google Forms platform during the spring semester of the 2024–2025 academic year. All analyses were conducted using Python (scipy, pandas, numpy) and Microsoft Excel. Scale reliability was assessed using Cronbach’s alpha. Normality was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons of gender were conducted using an independent-samples t-test, while comparisons of department and income level were conducted using one-way ANOVA. Effect sizes were reported as Cohen’s d for the t-test and as η² for ANOVA. The level of statistical significance was set at α = .05. Results: Descriptive findings showed that participants experienced the greatest difficulty in the social and environmental subscale (Mean = 2.24, SD = 0.66); followed, respectively, by individual learning difficulties (Mean = 2.19, SD = 0.62), exam and material related difficulties (Mean = 1.98, SD = 0.70), and teacher-related difficulties (Mean = 1.88, SD = 0.65). Independent-samples t-test results showed no statistically significant difference with respect to the gender variable (all p > .05). One-way ANOVA analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in total difficulty scores in terms of the department variable (F(5, 108) = 2.754, p = .022, η² = .113); students in departments offering intensive foreign language instruction reported lower difficulty scores. Differences in income level did not yield significant results (all p > .80). Conclusion: Although the Pearson correlations between subscales were positive and statistically significant (ranging from r = .45 to .76), the social and environmental subscales showed relatively lower correlations with the other dimensions. The findings underscore the importance of holistic and student-centred pedagogical approaches to foreign language instruction.
مراجع
Bayır, M. & Yeşil, R. (2019). Yabancı Dil Öğrenme Zorlukları Ölçeğinin Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 8 (2): 1573-1590. https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.530574
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2. baskı). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Statistical_Power_Analysis_for_the_Behav.html?id=gA04ngAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference (4. baskı). Allyn & Bacon. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/SPSS_for_Windows_Step_by_Step.html?id=AghHAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125-132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327314
Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Principles_and_Practice_in_Second_Langua.html?id=p9toAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3. baskı). McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Psychometric_Theory_3E.html?id=_6R_f3G58JsC&redir_esc=y
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 426-437. https://doi.org/10.2307/329492
دانلودها
چاپ شده
شماره
نوع مقاله
مجوز
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


