STEEEM MODEL: A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK TO ASSESS STEM-BASED LEARNING IN SCIENCE EDUCATION

Autori

  • Shaher R. Elayyan Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Oman orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-2301

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i2.6533

Parole chiave:

STEM Approach, STEEEM Model, performance-based assessment

Abstract

The current study aims to propose the STEEEM model for assessing students’ learning in science according to the STEM approach, bridging the gap between authentic assessment practices and traditional classroom methods. The study applied analytical and descriptive methodologies, gathering empirical data via a structured questionnaire and evaluating pertinent literature for the last ten years. The sample consisted of 89 female pre-service science teachers who were enrolled in Sohar University's Teacher Preparation Program during the 2024–2025 academic year. They were chosen based on their solid backgrounds in biology, chemistry, physics, and teaching procedures. A 30-item questionnaire to gather data covering six dimensions of assessment: Scientific skills, Technological skills, Engineering design processes, Entrepreneurial skills, Extended skills, and Mathematical skills. The significance of the study falls in line with the direct potential to guide science curriculum development and equip teachers with practical skills to implement performance-based assessments aligned with STEM philosophy and its educational aspects.

 

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Biografia autore

  • Shaher R. Elayyan, Faculty of Education and Arts, Sohar University, Oman orcid.org/0000-0003-0630-2301

    Shaher Elayyan holds a PhD in Curriculum and Instruction with a Science Education specialization, as well as a bachelor’s and master’s degree in physics. He has published books in physics and science education. He has 20 papers published in several areas, including STEM-Based learning and developing science in the digital transformation era, and has supervised approximately 30 master’s theses in science education. He has experience with the higher education systems of Saudi Arabia, Oman, and Jordan. In addition to memberships in reviewed journals and educational bodies, he has attended several academic events in Oman, Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Italy, the UK, and Singapore.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Akiri, E., Tor, H. M., & Dori, Y. J. (2021). Teaching and Assessment Methods: STEM Teachers’ Perceptions and Implementation. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(6). https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10882

Avery, Z.K. & Reeve, E.M. (2013). Developing Effective STEM Professional Development Programs. Journal of Technology Education, 25(1), 55-69. https://doi.org/10.21061/jte.v25i1.a.4

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Chaya, H. (2023). Investigating teachers’ perceptions of STEM education in private elementary schools in Abu Dhabi. Journal of Education and Learning, 12(2), 60–78. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v12n2p60

Christensen, R., Knezek, G. & Tyler-Wood, T. (2014). Student Perception of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM) Content and Careers. Computers in Human Behavior, 173-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.01.046

Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, Article 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z

Darling-Hammond, L., Flook, L., Cook-Harvey, C., Barron, B., & Osher, D. (2019). Implications for educational practice of the science of learning and development. Applied Developmental Science, 24(2), 97–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2018.1537791

Dewanti, B. A., Santoso, A., & Septaria, K. (2021). Assessment of critical thinking skills in STEM-based science learning through project assignments. In Proceedings of the 6th International Seminar on Science Education (ISSE 2020) (pp. 824–831). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210326.119

Dogra, B. (2015). Performance-based Assessment for Assessing Science Learning. The Primary Teacher, 40(2-3), p. 48-58. https://ejournals.ncert.gov.in/index.php/tpt/article/view/1225

Elayyan, S. (2021). The future of education according to the fourth industrial revolution. Journal of Educational Technology & Online Learning. 4(1): pp. 24-30. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.737193

English, L. D. (2016). STEM education K–12: Perspectives on integration. International Journal of STEM Education, 3(3), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-016-0036-1

English, L. D., King, D., & Smeed, J. (2017). Advancing integrated STEM learning through engineering design: Sixth-grade students’ design and construction of earthquake-resistant buildings. The Journal of Educational Research, 110(3), 255–271. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26586745

Fairhurst, N., Koul, R., & Sheffield, R. (2023). Students’ perceptions of their STEM learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 977–998. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984 023 09463 z

Fosnot, C. T. (2013). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (2nd ed.). Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Constructivism.html?id=-pIbAgAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Gao, X., Li, P., Shen, J., & Sun, H. (2020). Reviewing assessment of student learning in interdisciplinary STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 7(24). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00225-4

Gay, L., Mills, G. & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications. 10th edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Retrieved from https://www.pearson.com/en-us/subject-catalog/p/educational-research-competencies-for-analysis-and-applications/P200000001512/9780137534944

Green, S. L. (2014). STEM Education in a Competitive and Globalizing Word. Nova Science Publishers.

Guzey, S. S., Moore, T. J., Harwell, M., & Moreno, M. (2016). STEM integration in middle school life science: Student learning and attitudes. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(4), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-016-9612-x

Hacıoğlu, Y., Yamak, H., & Kavak, N. (2016). Pre-service science teachers’ cognitive structures regarding science, technology, engineering, mathematics (STEM) and science education. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 13(special), 88-102. Retrieved from https://www.tused.org/index.php/tused/article/view/625?articlesBySimilarityPage=27

Halawa, S., Lin, T.-C., & Hsu, Y.-S. (2024). Exploring instructional design in K-12 STEM education. International Journal of STEM Education, 11, 43. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00503-5

Honey, M., Pearson, G., & Schweingruber, H. (2014). STEM integration in K–12 education: Status, prospects, and an agenda for research. National Academies Press. Retrieved from https://www.middleweb.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/STEM-Integration-in-K12-Education.pdf

Ješková, Z., Lukáč, S., Šnajder, Ľ., Guniš, J., Klein, D., & Kireš, M. (2022). Active learning in STEM education with regard to the development of inquiry skills. Education Sciences, 12(10), 686. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12100686

Kearney, C. (2016). Efforts to increase students’ interest in pursuing science, technology, engineering and mathematics studies and careers: National measures taken by 30 countries (Report). European Schoolnet (EUN Partnership AISBL). Retrieved from http://www.eun.org/resources/detail?publicationID=783

Lynch, S. J., Peters-Burton, E., & Ford, M. R. (2014). Building STEM opportunities for all. Educational Leadership, 72(4), 54–60. Retrieved from https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/building-stem-opportunities-for-all

Margot, K.C. and Kettler, T. (2019). Teachers’ Perception of STEM Integration and Education: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of STEM Education, 6(1), 2-16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0151-2

Maric, D., Fore, G. A., & Nyarko, S. C. (2023). Measurement in STEM education research: A systematic literature review of trends in the psychometric evidence of scales. International Journal of STEM Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-023-00430-x.

Nabillah, T., Hamdu, G., & Ramadhani Putri, A. (2025). Elementary school teacher’s perceptions of STEM-based performance assessment across urban and rural contexts. EduStream: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 9(2), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.26740/eds.v9n2.p189-201

Osin, & Sahoo, M. (2022). Performance-based assessment in science at the elementary school level. International Journal of Advanced and Applied Research, 9(5), 646-650. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/363670572_PERFORMANCE-BASED_ASSESSMENT_IN_SCIENCE_AT_ELEMENTARY_SCHOOL_LEVEL

Park, H., Byun, S.-Y., Sim, J., Han, H.-S., & Baek, Y. S. (2016). Teachers’ Perceptions and Practices of STEAM Education in South Korea. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(7), 1739-1753. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2016.1531a

Permanasari, A., Rubini, B., & Nugroho, O. F. (2021). STEM education in Indonesia: Science teachers’ and students’ perspectives. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 2(1), 7–16. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.24

Rahman, S. M. M. (2021). Assessing and benchmarking learning outcomes of robotics-enabled STEM education. Education Sciences, 11(2), 84. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11020084

Stevens, R. (2012). Identifying 21st Century Capabilities. International Journal of Learning and Change, 6(3-4), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLC.2012.050857

Thibaut, L., Knipprath, H., Dehaene, W., & Depaepe, F. (2018). The influence of teachers’ attitudes and school context on instructional practices in integrated STEM education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 71, 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.12.014

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvjf9vz4

Walker, W. S., Moore, T. J., Guzey, S. S., & Sorge, B. H. (2018). Frameworks to Develop Integrated STEM Curricula. K-12 STEM Education, 4(2), 331–339. https://doi.org/10.14456/k12stemed.2018.5

Dowloads

Pubblicato

2026-02-13

Fascicolo

V. 13 N. 2 (2026)

Sezione

Articles

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).