LEARNING THEORIES, NEUROPHYSIOLOGICAL FOUNDATIONS AND STRATEGY-BASED SUPPORT FOR LEARNERS WITH LEARNING DIFFICULTIES: A LITERATURE REVIEW
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i9.6959Parole chiave:
learning theories, cognitive psychology, sociocultural theory, instructional models, mnemonic strategies, learning difficulties, literature reviewAbstract
Learning is a lifelong, experience-driven process that transforms knowledge and behavior and reflects adaptation to environmental regularities. Learning may occur without immediately observable behavioral change, making conceptual clarity essential for research. The review synthesizes major learning theories: behaviorism (reinforcement/contiguity), connectionism (stimulus–response bonds via trial and error), and classical conditioning; cognitive and constructivist accounts emphasizing perception, memory and active knowledge construction (Piaget, Vygotsky, Bruner); social learning through observation and intrinsic reinforcement; sociocultural views of learning as participation in communities of knowledge; and humanistic perspectives highlighting learner agency and the teacher as facilitator. It also contrasts teacher-centered and learner-centered instructional models, noting the contemporary shift toward learner-centered practice to address individual differences in aptitude, motivation, and prior experience. Finally, it refers to neurophysiological foundations, memory processes and age-related changes, mnemonic strategies, and implications for supporting learners with learning difficulties through individualized and adaptive instruction to improve memorization and educational outcomes.Riferimenti bibliografici
Behrens, T., Muller, T., Whittington, J., Mark, S., Baram, A., Stachenfeld, K., & Kurth-Nelson, Z. (2018). What Is a Cognitive Map? Organizing Knowledge for Flexible Behavior. Neuron, 100(2), 490-509. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.002
Bjorklund, D. (2018). A Metatheory for Cognitive Development (or “Piaget is Dead” Revisited). Child Development, 89(6), 2288-2302. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13019
Boyle, J., Forchelli, G., & Cariss, K. (2015). Note-Taking Interventions to Assist Students with Disabilities in Content Area Classes. Preventing School Failure: Alternative Education for Children and Youth, 59(3), 186-195. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2014.903463
Broström, S., Sandberg, A., Johansson, I., Margetts, K., Nyland, B., Frøkjær, T., & Kieferle, C. (2014). Preschool Teachers’ Views on Children’s Learning: An International Perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 185(5), 824-847. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2014.958483
Cook, D., & Artino, A. (2016). Motivation to learn: an overview of contemporary theories. Medical Education, 50(10), 997-1014. https://doi.org/10.1111/medu.13074
Crockett, J., Filippi, E., & Morgan, C. (2012). Included, but Underserved. Learning About Learning Disabilities, 405-436. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-388409-1.00015-1
Dorgu, T. (2015). Different Teaching Methods: A Panacea for Effective Curriculum Implementation in the Classroom. International Journal of Secondary Education, 3(6), 77-87. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.s.2015030601.13
Durkin, K., Mok, P., & Conti‐Ramsden, G. (2014). Core subjects at the end of primary school: identifying and explaining relative strengths of children with specific language impairment (SLI). International Journal of Language & Communication Disorders, 50(2), 226-240. https://doi.org/10.1111/1460-6984.12137
Ehsan, H., Rispoli, M., Lory, C., & Gregori, E. (2018). A Systematic Review of STEM Instruction with Students with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 5(4), 327-348. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40489-018-0142-8
Fernando, S., & Marikar, F. (2017). Constructivist Teaching/Learning Theory and Participatory Teaching Methods. Journal of Curriculum and Teaching, 6(1), 110-122. https://doi.org/10.5430/jct.v6n1p110
Friston, K., FitzGerald, T., Rigoli, F., Schwartenbeck, P., Doherty, J., & Pezzulo, G. (2016). Active inference and learning. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 68, 862-879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.06.022
Garbacz, L., Zychinski, K., Feuer, R., Carter, J., & Budd, K. (2014). Effects of Teacher-Child Interaction Training (TCIT) on teacher ratings of behavior change. Psychology in the Schools, 51(8), 850-865. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.21788
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change.
Gupta, P., & Sharma, V. (2017). Working Memory and Learning Disabilities: A Review. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 4(4), 111-121. https://bit.ly/2xgDnBY
Hedden, T., Lautenschlager, G., & Park, D. (2005). Contributions of processing ability and knowledge to verbal memory tasks across the adult life-span. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58(1), 169-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724980443000179
Iwamoto, D., Hargis, J., Bordner, R., & Chandler, P. (2017). Self-Regulated Learning as a Critical Attribute for Successful Teaching and Learning. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 11(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.20429/ijsotl.2017.110207
Kaliampos, G., Saregar, A., Fadillah, M. A., & Ravanis, K. (2025). An exploration of Physics teachers’ lesson plans within the IBSE framework: the case of teaching Mechanics in autistic students. Education Sciences, 15(11), 1535. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci15111535
Kaliampos, G., Ravanis, K., & Vavougios, D. (2021). A comparison study of alternative conceptions on impetus theory and projectile motion of adolescents with typical development and high functioning autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Science Education, 43(1), 128-156. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1859156
Klein, H., Moses, N., & Jean-Baptiste, R. (2010). Influence of Context on the Production of Complex Sentences by Typically Developing Children. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 41(3), 289-302. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161-1461(2009/08-0080
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015). Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553), 436-444. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
Lerkkanen, M., Kiuru, N., Pakarinen, E., Poikkeus, A., Rasku-Puttonen, M., Siekkinen, M., & Nurmi, J. (2016). Child-centered versus teacher-directed teaching practices: Associations with the development of academic skills in the first grade at school. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 145-156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2015.12.023
Lourenço, O. (2016). Developmental stages, Piagetian stages in particular: A critical review. New Ideas in Psychology, 40(B), 123-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2015.08.002
Lovibond, P., & Shanks, D. (2002). The role of awareness in Pavlovian conditioning: Empirical evidence and theoretical implications. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 28(1), 3-26. https://doi.org/10.1037/0097-7403.28.1.3
McGrath, A., & Hughes, M. (2017). Students with Learning Disabilities in Inquiry-Based Science Classrooms: A Cross-Case Analysis. Learning Disability Quarterly, 41(3), 131-143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0731948717736007
McLeskey, J., & Waldron, N. (2004). Three conceptions of teacher learning: Exploring the relationship between knowledge and the practice of teaching. Teacher Education and Special Education, 27(1), 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1177/088840640402700102
Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., & Bäckman, L. (2012). Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(5), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
Perry, N., Vandekamp, K., Mercer, L., & Nordby, C. (2002). Investigating teacher-student interactions that foster self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 37(1), 5-15. https://doi.org/10.1207/00461520252828519
Plasman, J., & Gottfried, M. (2016). Applied STEM Coursework, High School Dropout Rates, and Students with Learning Disabilities. Educational Policy, 32(5), 664-696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904816673738
Rimm-Kaufman, S., Curby, T., Grimm, K., Nathanson, L., & Brock, L. (2009). The contribution of children’s self-regulation and classroom quality to children’s adaptive behaviors in the kindergarten classroom. Developmental Psychology, 45(4), 958-972. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015861
Ryan, R., & Deci, E. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sormunen, K., Juuti, K., & Lavonen, J. (2020). Maker-Centered Project-Based Learning in Inclusive Classes: Supporting Students’ Active Participation with Teacher-Directed Reflective Discussions. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 18, 691-712. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09998-9
Spektor-Levy, O., & Yifrach, M. (2017). If Science Teachers Are Positively Inclined Toward Inclusive Education, Why Is It So Difficult? Research in Science Education, 49(3), 737-766. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9636-0
Tohidi, H., & Jabbari, M. (2012). The effects of motivation in education. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 820-824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.148
Tsesmeli, S. N., & Skarmoutsou, I. (2023). Implementing a scientifically based educational intervention in mainstream primary schools before and during COVID-19 era: Evidence from Greek-speaking children. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 139, 104563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2023.104563
Vygotsky, L. (2004). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42(1), 7-97. https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2004.11059210
Dowloads
Pubblicato
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


