THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS' CREATIVE PERSONALITY TRAITS AND MOTIVATION LEVELS

Autori

  • Selçuk Şimşek Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli, Turkey
  • Ali Rıza Erdem Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli, Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v13i9.7080

Parole chiave:

pre-service teachers, creative personality traits, motivation, predictive power, relationship

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between creative personality traits and motivation levels among pre-service teachers in Turkish public universities and to investigate the predictive effects of gender, university, department, academic program, and grade level on these variables. A correlational survey design was employed. The sample consisted of 756 pre-service teachers enrolled in faculties of education at eight public universities representing the seven geographical regions of Türkiye. Data were collected using the Creative Personality Traits Scale developed by Şahin and Danışman (2017), the Adult Motivation Scale developed by Tulunay Ateş and İhtiyaroğlu (2019), and a personal information form. Multiple regression and Spearman correlation analyses were used to analyze the data. The findings revealed that gender, university, department, academic program, and grade level jointly predicted both creative personality traits and motivation levels. University and academic program were significant predictors of creative personality traits, whereas university emerged as the only significant predictor of motivation. However, the explanatory power of the regression models was relatively low (R² = .022). The most notable finding of the study was the existence of a positive, moderate, and statistically significant relationship between creative personality traits and motivation levels among pre-service teachers (r = .536, p < .01). This result suggests that motivational processes play an important role in the development of creative personality characteristics. The findings highlight the importance of incorporating practices that foster intrinsic motivation and creative thinking into teacher education programs. Such practices may contribute to the development of more innovative, adaptable, and professionally competent future teachers.

Biografie autore

  • Selçuk Şimşek, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli, Turkey

    Assoc. Prof. Dr. Selçuk Şimşek serves as a faculty member in the Department of Primary Education at Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education. His academic research focuses on primary education, life sciences and social studies instruction, values education, and teacher training. His studies explore areas such as creative personality traits and motivation levels of prospective teachers, educational history, character education, and contemporary instructional models in these fields. He has published numerous articles, book chapters, and scientific studies in peer-reviewed national and international journals.

  • Ali Rıza Erdem, Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Denizli, Turkey

    Assoc. Prof. Dr. Ali Rıza Erdem serves as a faculty member in the Department of Educational Sciences at Pamukkale University, Faculty of Education. His academic research focuses on educational management, inspection, planning, and economics, as well as teacher training. His studies explore areas such as school administration, leadership, educational policies, and teacher education. He has published numerous articles, book chapters, and scientific studies in peer-reviewed national and international journals.

Riferimenti bibliografici

Amabile, T. M. (2018). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity (1.baskı). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429501234

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Self_Efficacy.html?id=eJ-PN9g_o-EC&redir_esc=y

Craft, A. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8527.t01-1-00229

Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful teacher education: Lessons from Exemplary programs. Jossey-Bass. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Powerful_Teacher_Education.html?id=_ETQd-zD8RUC&redir_esc=y

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum Press. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7

Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0204_5

Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (7th ed.). McGraw-Hill. Retrieved from https://saochhengpheng.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/jack_fraenkel_norman_wallen_helen_hyun-how_to_design_and_evaluate_research_in_education_8th_edition_-mcgraw-hill_humanities_social_sciences_languages2011.pdf

Gray, C. J. (2026). Prepared to perceive: Teacher preparation programs, teacher professional learning, and desirability of creativity in the classroom. Journal of Advanced Academics 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/1932202X261445971

Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0063487

Gürkan, S. N., & Ramazan, O. (2026). Okul öncesi öğretmenliği öğrencilerinin yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri ile oyunseverlik eğilimleri ilişkisi. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 26(1), 555–579. https://doi.org/10.17240/aibuefd.2026..-1677088

Hirsh, J. B., & Peterson, J. B. (2008). Predicting creativity and academic success with a brief measure of the Big Five. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science / Revue canadienne des sciences du comportement, 40(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1037/0008-400X.40.2.129

Karasar, N. (2019). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemi: Kavramlar, ilkeler, teknikler (34. bs.). Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Retrieved from https://www.nobelyayin.com/bilimsel-arastirma-yontemi-kavramlar-ilkeler-teknikler_1755.html

Kılıç, K., & Kuşcu, Ö. (2024). An analysis of the relationship between creative personality traits and shyness levels among teacher candidates. Çukurova Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 53(3), 1354–1383. https://doi.org/10.14812/cuefd.1469916

Leylak, D., & Say, S. (2021). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri ile yaratıcılığı destekleme becerileri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilgilerde Yeni Yaklaşımlar Dergisi, 5(1), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.38015/sbyy.911805

Makhabbat, A., Çoklar, A. N., & Gündüz, Ş. (2018). Eğitim araştırmasına yönelik tutum ile akademik güdülenme ve akademik özyeterlik arasındaki ilişki. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 19(1), 786-801. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/kefad/article/850539

O'Connell, B. (1973). Aspects of learning. George Allen & Unwin. Retrieved from https://ttl.run.edu.ng/bib/7650

Onol, M. (2025). Öğretmen adaylarında yaratıcı düşünmenin gelişimine yönelik SCAMPER temelli uygulama ve Torrance yaratıcılık boyutlarına göre analizi. International Journal of Innovative Approaches in Social Sciences, 9 (3), 86–121. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijiasos.2025.1353.1

Mark A. Runco & Garrett J. Jaeger (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 24(1) 92-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092

Richardson, P. W., & Watt, H. M. G. (2006). Who chooses teaching and why? Profiling characteristics and motivations across three Australian universities. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 34(1), 27–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/13598660500480224

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1020

Schreglmann, S. ve Kazancı, A. (2016). Öğretmen adaylarının bilişim teknolojileri Kullanım durumlarının çeşitli değişkenler açısından incelenmesi. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 6(1), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.17949/etku.07474

Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: theory, research, and applications (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Motivation_in_Education.html?id=taMvAAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Simonton, D. K. (2000). Creativity: Cognitive, personal, developmental, and social aspects. American Psychologist, 55(1), 151–158. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.151

Sternberg,R.J. (2006). The Nature of Creativity, Creativity Research Journal, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_10

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1998-08125-001

Şahin, Ç. (2021). Öğretmen adaylarının yaratıcı düşünme eğilimleri ile problem çözme becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 17(2), 145–158.

Şahin, F., & Danışman, Ş. (2017). Yaratıcı kişilik özellikleri ölçeği: Güvenilirlik ve geçerlik çalışması. Karabük Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 7 (2), 747–760. Retrieved from https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/article-file/374284

Torrance, E. P. (1974). Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Norms-technical manual. Scholastic Testing Service. Retrieved from https://fullpdfword.com/look-up/mL1A78/600783/5020536-torrance-tests-of-creative-thinking-norms-technical-manual

Tulunay Ateş, Ö., & İhtiyaroğlu, N. (2019). Yetişkin motivasyon ölçeği: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(2), 611–620. https://doi.org/10.24106/kefdergi.2612

Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Senécal, C., & Vallières, E. F. (1992). The Academic Motivation Scale: A measure of intrinsic, extrinsic, and motivation in education. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 52(4), 1003–1017. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164492052004025

Yılmaz, A. (2023). Öğretmen adaylarının akademik motivasyon düzeyleri ile mesleki kaygıları arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 65(2), 112–128.

Dowloads

Pubblicato

2026-09-29

Fascicolo

V. 13 N. 9 (2026)

Sezione

Articles

Licenza

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).