TEACHING VIETNAMESE UNDERGRADUATES’ METHOD SECTION WRITING THROUGH PROCESS GENRE APPROACH
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v10i2.6794Klíčová slova:
process genre approach, product approach, method section, quasi-experiment designAbstrakt
The main objective of this study is to find out whether the process genre approach is better than the product approach to teach method writing to university students in Vietnam. A non-equivalent control group experimental design with pretest and posttest was used to determine the effects of the research writing program on students’ method writing ability in terms of the content, organization, language use, and mechanics use between the control group and experimental group. In the experiment, 65 participants (the third-year students, majoring in English) were placed into one experimental group (20 students) and one control group (45 students). Two groups were instructed by the same lecturer during one semester of 10 periods (theory, practice and assessment). The experimental group was required to receive the proposed research writing program based on the proposed model, whereas the control group received the existing program through the product approach. After the treatment, the results revealed a significant difference in the means of posttest scores on language use and mechanics use skills, except for content and organization in the method section. For this reason, we can conclude that the process genre approach positively affects language use and mechanics use skills, except for content and organization in the method section, compared to the product approach.Reference
Badger, R., & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT journal, 54(2), 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153
Canseco, G., & Byrd, P. (1989). Writing required in graduate courses in business administration. TESOL Quarterly, 23(2), 305-316. https://doi.org/10.2307/3587338
Chow, T. V. F. (2007). The effects of the process-genre approach to writing instruction on the expository essays of ESL students in a Malaysian secondary school. PhD diss., Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://erepo.usm.my/items/7ec3c548-d4cd-475e-bca8-394ab763e952
Clarke, D. F. (1989). Materials adaptation: why leave it all to the teacher?. ELT Journal, 43(2), 133-141. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/43.2.133
Carter-Thomas, A. Rowley-Jolivet E. (2003). Analysing the scientific conference presentation (CP), A methodological overview of a multimodal genre. https://doi.org/10.4000/asp.1295
Cooper, A., & Bikowski, D. (2007). Writing at the graduate level: What tasks do professors actually require?. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(3), 206-221.
Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M. L., & Hanson, W. E. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research, 209(240), 209-240. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/235700625_Advance_Mixed_methods_Research_Designs
Cunningsworth, A., Tomlinson, B. (1984). Evaluating and Selecting EFL Teaching Materials. 1st edition. London: Biddles Ltd, Guildford and King's Lynn. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Evaluating_and_Selecting_EFL_Teaching_Ma.html?id=NpNtQgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Dudley-Evans, T. (1997). Five questions for LSP teacher training. Teacher education for LSP, 58-67.
Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (2005). Second language listening: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Second_Language_Listening.html?id=P1CpYhp0nZMC&redir_esc=y
Gatbonton, E. (2000). Investigating experienced ESL teachers' pedagogical knowledge. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(4), 585-616. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/330405
Grant, N. (1987). Making the most of your textbook. London: Longman. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Making_the_Most_of_Your_Textbook.html?id=pM14AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Graves, K. (1996). CH 2 A framework of course. Teachers as course developers, 12. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/550508390/Graves-K-1996-Ch-2-A-Framework-for-curriculum-design
Horowitz, D. M. (1986). What professors actually require: Academic tasks for the ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 445-462. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2307/3586294
Hutchinson, T. (1987). English for Specific Purposes. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/English_for_Specific_Purposes.html?id=s2FIpUv7gaoC&redir_esc=y
Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2005). Teaching a Korean university writing class. Asian EFL, 7(2), 1-15. Retrieved from https://www.sciepub.com/reference/115094
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. P. (2019). Language curriculum design. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763
Madsen, H., & Bowen, T. (1978). Materials for English language teaching. Oxford University Press.
McMillan, J.H. & Schumacher, S. (1993). Research in education a conceptual introduction. New York: Harper Collins. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Research_in_Education.html?id=Whg6PgAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Martin, J. R. (2009). Genre and language learning: A social semiotic perspective. Linguistics and Education, 20, 10–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2009.01.003
Navaitienė, J., Račelytė, D., & Rimkevičienė, V. (2015). Adaptation of handbook for development of intercultural competence: The experiences. Pedagogika, 119(3), 33-44. https://doi.org/10.15823/p.2015.021
Pessoa, S., Mitchell, T. D., & Miller, R. T. (2018). Scaffolding the argument genre in a multilingual university history classroom: Tracking the writing development of novice and experienced writers. English for Specific Purposes, 50, 81-96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2017.12.002
Pujianto et al., (2014). A process-genre approach to teaching writing report text to senior high school students. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 99-110. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v4i1.603
Rakedzon, T., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). Assessing and improving L2 graduate students’ popular science and academic writing in an academic writing course. Educational Psychology, 37(1), 48-66. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2016.1192108
Richards, J. C. (1998). Beyond training: Perspectives on language teacher education. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Beyond_Training.html?id=luNE6oI05V0C&redir_esc=y
Rogers, R. R. (2001). Reflection in higher education: A concept analysis. Innovative higher education, 26(1), 37-57. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010986404527
Saper, C. B. (2014). Academic publishing, part III: how to write a research paper (so that it will be accepted) in a high-quality journal. Annals of Neurology, 77(1), 8–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.24317
Sharadgah, T. A. (2013). Writing in an Internet-based environment: Improving EFL students’ writing performance through text-based chat. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(14), 258-266.
Shim, E. (2005). Introductions in research papers: Genre analysis of academic writing. 영어교육, 60(4). Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Introductions-in-Research-Papers%3A-Genre-Analysis-of-Shim/b0fc03bb67c6ac1d227ec63e48085f4d1c391f09
Sikorova, Z. (2011). The role of textbooks in lower secondary schools in the Czech Republic. IARTEM e-Journal, 4(2), 1-22. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332080640_The_role_of_textbooks_in_lower_secondary_schools_in_the_Czech_Republic_IARTEM_e-Journal_ISSN_1837-2104
Swales, J; Feak, C. (2004). Academic Writing for Graduate Students: Essential Tasks and Skills. (2nd Edition). The University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Academic_Writing_for_Graduate_Students.html?id=g1dnvtygKKwC&redir_esc=y
Utami, M. M. W. (2015). The effectiveness of the process-genre approach in teaching writing viewed from students’self-esteem an Experimental Research on the Grade Eleven Students of SMA Regina Pacis Surakarta in the Academic Year of 2013/2014 (Doctoral dissertation, fakultas keguruan dan ilmu pendidikan). Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/THE-EFFECTIVENESS-OF-PROCESS-GENRE-APPROACH-IN-FROM-Utami/fd99d12220c75a1d6fb3764c325c0bb079ed1999
Yan, G. (2005). A process genre model for teaching writing. In English Teaching Forum, 43(3), 18-26.
Van Waes, L., & Schellens, P. J. (2003). Writing profiles: The effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers. Journal of Pragmatics, 35(6), 829-853. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(02)00121-2
Zhu, W. (2004). Writing in business courses: An analysis of assignment types, their characteristics, and required skills. English for Specific Purposes, 23(2), 111-135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0889-4906(02)00046-7
Stažení
Publikováno
Číslo
Sekce
Licence
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).


