STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF CONSTRUCTIVE ALIGNMENT IN THE GENERAL ENGLISH 3 COURSE TOWARD ACHIEVING THE FOREIGN LANGUAGE PROFICIENCY OUTCOME AT LEVEL 3
DOI :
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v9i3.6196Mots-clés :
constructive alignment, language proficiency at level 3, English language education, student perceptionRésumé
This study investigates the extent to which students perceive constructive alignment among educational components in the General English 3 course at Nam Can Tho University, and how such alignment supports achievement of the English proficiency at level 3, as defined by Vietnam’s 6-level Foreign Language Proficiency Framework. Drawing on Biggs’ (2003) Constructive Alignment theory, the research adopts a sequential mixed-methods design, comprising a quantitative survey of 1128 non-English-major students and qualitative interviews with 25 students. The findings indicate moderate to positive perceptions of alignment across key domains, including intended learning outcomes (ILOs), course content, teaching methods, and assessment-feedback approaches. However, gaps persist in students' understanding of ILOs, active engagement in class, and clarity in assessment criteria. The study concludes by offering pedagogical recommendations for improving curriculum design, enhancing alignment, and supporting students in achieving the required foreign language learning outcomes.
Article visualizations:
Références
Ali, L. (2018). The Design of Curriculum, Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education with Constructive Alignment. Journal of Education and e-learning Research, 5(1), 72-78. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1173088.pdf
Berry, R. (2011). Assessment reforms around the world. Assessment reform in education (pp. 89-102): Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0729-0_7
Biggs, B. J. (2003a). Aligning teaching for constructing learning. Hong Kong: the Higher Education Academy. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/255583992_Aligning_Teaching_for_Constructing_Learning
Biggs, B. J. (2003b). Teaching for quality learning at university (2nd edition). Buckingham: Open University Press/Society for Research into Higher Education. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215915395_Teaching_for_Quality_Learning_at_University
Biggs, J. (1993). From theory to practice: A cognitive systems approach. Higher education research and development, 12(1), 73-85. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/From-Theory-to-Practice%3A-A-Cognitive-Systems-Biggs/c6c650b92212cb394e2d02db02e3dfda2ebe5c19
Biggs, J. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment. Higher education, 32(3), 347-364. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138871
Biggs, J., & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university: McGraw-Hill education (UK). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/215915395_Teaching_for_Quality_Learning_at_University
Biggs, J., Tang, C., & Kennedy, G. (2022). Teaching for quality learning at university 5e. McGraw-Hill Education (UK). Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Teaching_for_Quality_Learning_at_Univers.html?id=pseVEAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Biggs, J. (1999). Teaching for quality learning at university. The UK: Buckingham: SRHE/OU Press.
Braun, S. (2005). From pedagogically relevant corpora to authentic language learning contents. ReCALL, 17(1), 47-64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000510
Brindley, G. (1989). The role of needs analysis in adult ESL programme design. The second language curriculum, 63, 78. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/abs/second-language-curriculum/role-of-needs-analysis-in-adult-esl-programme-design/2C0EE1E8CE896012238CA7C107A4D0C2
Brown, D. J. (2001). Using surveys in a language program. NY: Cambrige University Press. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=952374
Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of Language Learning and Teaching (5th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman. Retrieved from https://gustavorubinoernesto.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/H-Douglas-Brown-Principles-of-Language-Learning-and-Teaching.pdf
Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development: ERIC. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED397672
Carless, D. (2015). Excellence in University Assessment: Learning from Award-winning Practice. Routledge. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315740621
Cohen, M. L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research Methods in Education (6th Ed). New York: Taylor & Francis e - Library publishers. Retrieved from https://islmblogblog.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/rme-edu-helpline-blogspot-com.pdf
Council of Europe. (2011). Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int/en/web/common-european-framework-reference-languages
Edwards, J. (1991). Evaluation in adult and further education: a practical handbook for teachers and organizers: Workers' Educational Association. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000193933
Freeman, D. (2000). Designing Language Courses: A Guide for Teachers. Boston: Heinle & Heinle. Retrieved from https://www.library.brawnblog.com/Designing%20Language%20Courses-A%20guide%20for%20teachers-p320.pdf
Fullan, M. (2007). The New Meaning of Educational Change 4th. New York: Teachers College Press. Retrieved from https://michaelfullan.ca/books/new-meaning-educational-change/
Gallagher, G. (2017). Aligning for learning: Including feedback in the Constructive Alignment model. All Ireland Journal of Higher Education, 9(1).
Genon, L. J. D., & Torres, C. B. P. (2020). Constructive Alignment of Assessment Practices in English Language Classrooms. English Language Teaching Educational Journal, 3(3), 211-228. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1283061.pdf
Guide to AUN-QA Assessment at Programme Level version 4.0 (2020), Bangkok: Thailand.
Gillham, B. (2008). Developing a questionnaire. London: A&C Black. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Developing_a_Questionnaire.html?id=EpKvAwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Hailikari, T., Virtanen, V., Vesalainen, M., & Postareff, L. (2021). Student perspectives on how different elements of constructive alignment support active learning. Active Learning in Higher Education. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787421989160
Hall, D., & Hewings, A. (2001). Innovation in English language teaching: A reader: Psychology Press. Retrieved from https://www.routledge.com/Innovation-in-English-Language-Teaching-A-Reader/Hall-Hewings/p/book/9780415241243?srsltid=AfmBOoqwQaIy-XaCOvcBhJqQZa4VzHHopQb5MUfb2tuHW0HGEjVV4RYS
Hussain, A., Dogar, A. H., Azeem, M., & Shakoor, A. (2011). Evaluation of the curriculum development process. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(14), 263-271. Retrieved from https://vulms.vu.edu.pk/Courses/EDU402/Downloads/Evaluation_of_Curriculum_Development_Pro.pdf
Jaiswal, P. (2019). Using Constructive Alignment to Foster Teaching and Learning Processes. English Language Teaching, 12(6), 10-23. Retrieved from https://vulms.vu.edu.pk/Courses/EDU402/Downloads/Evaluation_of_Curriculum_Development_Pro.pdf
Jani, M. D. B. M., Latif, A. B. A., Talib, R. B., & Is, N. B. M. (2020). The implementation of constructive alignment at the teachers' education institute using Rasch analysis. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 659-665. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.11.120
Kozulin, A. (2004). Vygotsky's theory in the classroom: Introduction. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 3-7. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2004-21115-001
Lợi, N. V., & Hằng, C. T. T. (2014). Các Yếu Tố Ảnh Hưởng Năng Lực Tiếng Anh Của Sinh Viên Sư Phạm Tiếng Anh, Trường Đại Học Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Khoa học Đại học Cần Thơ, (32), 67-74.
Macaro, E. (2001). Learning strategies in foreign and second language classrooms: The role of learner strategies: A&C Black. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbury.com/uk/learning-strategies-in-foreign-and-second-language-classrooms-9780826451354/
Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah: NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2005-02697-000
Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273120013_Managing_Curricular_Innovation
McCombs, B. L. (2001). What do we know about learners and learning? The learner-centered framework: Bringing the educational system into balance. Educational Horizons, 182-193. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234626800_What_Do_We_Know_about_Learners_and_Learning_The_Learner-Centered_Framework_Bringing_the_Educational_System_into_Balance
McKay, P., & Graves, K. (2006). Planning and Teaching Creatively within a Required Curriculum for School-Age Learners: ERIC. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/234568757_Planning_and_Teaching_Creatively_within_a_Required_Curriculum_for_School-Age_Learners
MoET (2014). Khung năng lực ngoại ngữ 6 bậc dùng cho Việt Nam. Bộ Giáo dục và Đào tạo.
MoET. (2016a). The Circular promulgates regulations on standards for assessing the quality of training programs at higher education levels. 04/2016/TT-BGDĐT.
MoET. (2016b). General guidance on the use of standards for assessing the quality of training programs at higher education levels. Documentary No. 1074/KTKĐCLGD-KĐĐH/ BGDĐT.
MoET. (2018). General Education Program - Master Program. Circulars No. 32/2018/TT-BGDĐT.
Morrison, M. (2007). What do we mean by educational research? Research methods in educational leadership and management, 2, 13-36. Retrieved from https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/What-do-we-mean-by-educational-research-Morrison/3b7dc68de1f061001ded99c41bccd6f1046c837e
Mukhtar, U., Ahmed, U., Anwar, S., & Baloch, M. A. (2015). Factors affecting the service quality of public and private sector universities comparatively: an empirical investigation. Journal of Arts, Science & Commerce, 3(1), 132-142. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/317328880_FACTORS_EFFECTING_THE_SERVICE_QUALITY_OF_PUBLIC_AND_PRIVATE_SECTOR_UNIVERSITIES_COMPARATIVELY_AN_EMPIRICAL_INVESTIGATION
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in higher education, 31(2), 199-218.
Nunan, D. (1988). Syllabus Design. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Syllabus_Design.html?id=xp7h2xT907kC&redir_esc=y
Nguyen, T. M. (2020). Constructive alignment in teaching English at the tertiary level: an insight into an AUN-designed course. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 8th OpenTESOL International Conference 2020, Ho Chi Minh City Open University. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/342976992_CONSTRUCTIVE_ALIGNMENT_IN_TEACHING_ENGLISH_AT_TERTIARY_LEVEL_AN_INSIGHT_INTO_AN_AUN-DESIGNED_COURSE
Nguyen, T. V. S., & Laws, K. (2019). Changes in higher education teachers’ perceptions of curriculum. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 11(1). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-06-2018-0097
Oliva, P. F., & Gordon II, W. R. (2012). Developing the curriculum: Pearson Higher Ed. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Developing_the_Curriculum.html?id=wW8vAAAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies. New York, 3. Retrieved from https://archive.org/details/languagelearning0000oxfo
Print, M. (1993). Curriculum development and design: Allen & Unwin. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003115328
Reid, N. (2003). Getting started in pedagogical research in the physical sciences. LTSN: Physical Sciences Centre. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242482113_Getting_Started_in_Pedagogical_Research_in_the_Physical_Sciences_written_by
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. the USA: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/curriculum-development-in-language-teaching/CF5B24C0ADF73DE76BC6638B892661AF
Richards, J. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2002). Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667190
Saberton, S. (1985). Learning partnerships. Herdsa News, 7(1), 3-5. Retrieved from https://search.informit.org/doi/10.3316/aeipt.23740
Weerasinghe, I. M. S., & Fernando, R. L. S. (2018). Critical factors affecting students’ satisfaction with higher education in Sri Lanka. Quality Assurance in Education, 26(1), 115-130. doi: https://doi.org/10.1108/QAE-04-2017-0014
Williams, E. N., Soeprapto, E., Like, K., Touradji, P., Hess, S., & Hill, C. E. (1998). Perceptions of secrendipity: Career paths of prominent academic women in counseling psychology. Journal of counseling psychology, 45(4), 379. Retrieved from https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1037/0022-0167.45.4.379
Worthen, B. R. (1990). Program Evaluation. In H. Walberg & G. Haertel (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of educational evaluation. Toronto: ON: Pergammon Press. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000170217
Zineldin, M., Akdag, H. C., & Vasicheva, V. (2011). Assessing quality in higher education: new criteria for evaluating students’ satisfaction. Quality in Higher Education, 17(2), 231-243. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ935665
Téléchargements
Publié
Numéro
Rubrique
Licence
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
