EFL STUDENTS’ RECOGNITION OF FRICATIVE SOUNDS AT A UNIVERSITY IN THE SOUTH OF VIETNAM

Autor

  • Tạ Thị Hương Lan Trà Vinh University, Trà Vinh, Vietnam
  • Nguyễn Duy Khang Cần Thơ University, Cần Thơ, Vietnam

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i2.3407

Słowa kluczowe:

fricative sounds, student’s performance, sound recognition, capacity

Abstrakt

This research aims at investigating learners’ capacity to aurally and visually recognize and properly pronounce the fricative sounds. A descriptive study was conducted with 156 participants. Since research about pronunciation which has incidentally been assumed and framed to be extremely outdated in the research context, various tests and research tool for both qualitative and quantitative data were utilized for better triangulation of the evidence. The two listening tests focused on the learners’ ability of sound recognition for fricative sounds. Then, interviews were utilized to collect both teachers and learners’ strategies for learning pronunciation. Regarding the two tests, a minimal pair is designed for each question using a native speaker’s voice. In each pair of words in test #1, learners choose one that they can distinguish. Similarly, in test #2 one word of each pair would be pronounced incorrectly (e.g. most of pairs) and learners listen and determine the right or wrong sound(s). Afterwards, four teachers and eleven learners were interviewed about this matter. Finally, this study reveals several surprising findings. Learners cannot identify and recognize these sounds /f/-/v/, /f/-/θ/, /s/-/z/, /s/-/ʒ/, /s/-/ʃ/, /ʃ/-/θ/, /z/-/ʒ/, and /ʒ/-/ʃ/. The reasons for such dominated problems in identifying these fricative sounds include their mis-matched cognitive knowledge about different sounds and their psychology in uttering the sounds. From this study, several implications are drawn out to raise a proper awareness to learners’ practice of pronunciation with recommended methods so that teachers can help learners develop their abilities in distinguishing the sounds to pronounce accurately and improve their communicative efficiency.

Article visualizations:

Hit counter

Bibliografia

Ahmad, J., & Muhiburrahman, M. (2013). Teachers’ perspectives on errors in English consonant sounds by Saudi EFL learners. Asian Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences (AJHSS), 1(3), 150-163.

Bernhardt, B. M., Másdóttir, T., Stemberger, P. J., Leonhardt, L. & Ó. Hansson, G. (2015). Fricative acquisition in English- and Icelandic-speaking preschoolers with protracted phonological development, Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics, 29:8-10, 642-665.

Bui, T. S. (2016). Pronunciation of Consonants /ð/ and /θ/ by Adult Vietnamese EFL Learners. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 125-134.

Chen, C. H. & Han, W. Q. (2019). L3 phonology: contributions of L1 and L2 to L3 pronunciation learning by Hong Kong speakers, International Journal of Multilingualism, 16:4, 492-512.

Dalton, C., & Seidlhofer, B. (1994). Pronunciation. Oxford University Press.

Fauzi, F. (2014). Error Analysis of Sundanese English Pronunciation on Fricatives Sound. Journal Buletin Al-Turas, 20(1), 199-218.

Fouz-González, J. (2017). Pronunciation instruction through Twitter: the case of commonly mispronounced words, Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30:7, 631-663.

Georgios P. Georgiou (2019). EFL teachers’ cognitions about pronunciation in Cyprus, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 40:6, 538-550.

Herman S. (2016). Students’ difficulties in pronouncing the English labiodental sounds. Communication and Linguistics Studies, 2(1), 1-5.

Kelly, G. (2000). How to Teach Pronunciation. Malaysia: Pearson Education.

Keshavarz, M. H., and Khamis Abubakar, M. (2017). An investigation into pronunciation problems of Hausaspeaking learners of English. International Online Journal of Education and Teaching (IOJET), 4(1). 61-72.

Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36(3), 345–366.

Metruk, Rastislav (2017). Pronunciation of English Dental Fricatives by Slovak University EFL Students. International Journal of English Linguistics. 7. 11. 10.5539/ijel.v7n3p11.

Nguyen, D. K. (2018). New Application of Raymond Padilla’s Unfolding Matrix in Framing Qualitative Data and the Follow-up Activities for Educational Research. Journal of International Qualitative Methods. Retrieved from http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/metrics/10.1177/1609406918786820.

Nguyen, L. T., & Newton, J. (2020). Pronunciation Teaching in Tertiary EFL Classes: Vietnamese Teachers' Beliefs and Practices. TESL-EJ, 24(1), n1.

Nguyen, T. T. T. (2007). Difficulties for Vietnamese when pronouncing English: Final Consonants. Retrieved from http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:du-2915.

Nordquist, R. (2018). Phoneme vs Minimum Pair in English Phonetics. Glossary of Grammatical and Rhetorical Terms, [online]. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/minimal-pair-phonetics-1691392.

Rahimi, M. & Ruzrokh, S. (2016). The impact of teaching Lingua Franca Core on English as a foreign language learners’ intelligibility and attitudes towards English pronunciation. Asian Englishes. 18(2), 141-156.

Roach, P. (2009). English Phonetics and Phonology Paperback with Audio CDs (2): A Practical Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Shabani, K., & Ghasemian, A. (2017). Teacher’s personality type and techniques of teaching pronunciation. Cogent Education, 4.1-16. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1313560.

Pobrania

Opublikowane

2020-11-03

Numer

Tom 5 Nr 2 (2020)

Dział

Articles

Licencja

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).