NON ENGLISH-MAJORED STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF USING L1 TRANSLATION IN VOCABULARY LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v10i2.6923Palavras-chave:
L1 translation, vocabulary learning, EFL learners, learner perceptionsResumo
This study investigates non-English-majored students’ perceptions of using L1 translation in vocabulary learning in an EFL context. A mixed-methods design was employed, involving a questionnaire administered to 374 students and semi-structured interviews with selected participants. The study explored four dimensions: perceived usefulness of L1 translation, its effectiveness compared to other vocabulary learning strategies, its cognitive and affective benefits, and its perceived limitations. The quantitative findings revealed that students held highly positive perceptions of L1 translation. Participants strongly agreed that translation facilitated vocabulary comprehension, improved retention, and supported more efficient learning. They also perceived it as more effective than strategies such as memorization and contextual guessing. In addition, students reported that L1 translation provided cognitive and affective benefits, including increased confidence, reduced anxiety, improved concentration, and greater classroom participation. However, moderate agreement was found regarding its limitations, particularly overdependence, reduced exposure to English input, and possible interference with communicative fluency. The qualitative findings supported these results, showing that students used translation to quickly understand unfamiliar vocabulary and link new words with prior knowledge, while also acknowledging potential drawbacks when it is overused. Overall, the study suggests that L1 translation is perceived as a valuable vocabulary learning strategy among non-English-majored students, functioning as both a cognitive and affective support. The findings highlight the importance of balanced use of translation alongside other vocabulary learning strategies in EFL instruction.Referências
Alharthi, M., Bown, A., & Pullen, D. (2020). The use of social media platforms to enhance vocabulary development in learning a new language: A review of the literature. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 6, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.21
Al-Malki, N. S. (2022). Integrating learning strategies for EFL learners’ vocabulary enrichment and retention. Linguistics and Culture Review, 6(S2), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.21744/lingcure.v6ns2.2218
Beinborn, L., Zesch, T., & Gurevych, I. (2014). Readability for foreign language learning: The importance of cognates. ITL: International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 165(2), 136–162. https://doi.org/10.1075/itl.165.2.02bei
Boers, F., Warren, P., Grimshaw, G., & Siyanova-Chanturia, A. (2017). On the benefits of multimodal annotations for vocabulary uptake from reading. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30(7), 709-725. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2017.1356335
Bogulski, C. A., Bice, K., & Kroll, J. F. (2019). Bilingualism as a desirable difficulty: Advantages in word learning depend on regulation of the dominant language. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 22(5), 1052–1067. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1366728918000858
Bosma, E., Bakker, A., Zenger, L., & Blom, E. (2023). Supporting the development of the bilingual lexicon through translanguaging: A realist review integrating psycholinguistics with educational sciences. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 38(1), 225–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-021-00586-6
Čarapić, D. (2022). Importance of translation in teaching and learning English for electrical and mechanical engineering: Case study. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 10(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.22190/jtesap2202261c
Chen, X., Zhao, K., & Dang, Q. (2023). Translanguaging in a French-medium CLIL course: An action research on a novice teacher’s course preparation. Porta Linguarum: revista internacional de didáctica de las lenguas extranjeras, (8), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.30827/portalin.viviii.29213
Chowdhury, T. A., & Ara, A. (2021). Pre-teaching vocabulary in teaching reading skill: A hindrance to learner autonomy. Indonesian TESOL Journal, 3(2), 123–132. https://doi.org/10.24256/itj.v3i2.1818
Dziemianko, A. (2022). The usefulness of graphic illustrations in online dictionaries. ReCALL, 34(2), 218-234. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344021000264
Fatimah, S., Susilo, S., & Sjamsir, H. (2017). The effect of using L1 in EFL teaching on secondary school students’ vocabulary achievement. In 2017 International Conference on Education and Technology (2017 ICEduTech) (pp. 148-153). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/icedutech-17.2018.29
Gaballa, H. E. M., & Al-Khayri, M. A. (2014). Testing collocational knowledge of Taif University English seniors. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19(11), 63–90. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-191136390
Goodrich, J. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2018). Language-minority children’s sensitivity to the semantic relations between words. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 167, 259–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.11.001
Gyllstad, H., Sundqvist, P., Sandlund, E., & Källkvist, M. (2023). Effects of word definitions on meaning recall: A multisite intervention in language-diverse second language English classrooms. Language Learning, 73(2), 403–444. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12527
Indriyani, A. (2019). The impact of vocabulary learning strategies on vocabulary acquisition to adult learners. In 3rd International Conference on Current Issues in Education (ICCIE 2018) (pp. 113-117). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/iccie-18.2019.20
Ismaiel, N. M., & Al Asmari, A. A. (2017). The Effectiveness of a Programme-Based Vocabulary Learning Strategies for Developing English Vocabulary for EFL Female Students at Taif University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8(3), 113-125. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.3p.113
Khodaparast, S. M., & Keshmirshekan, M. H. (2021). Task-induced Involvement Load, vocabulary learning and reading comprehension among Iranian intermediate English as a foreign language learners. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(11), 200-208. https://doi.org/10.32996/ijllt.2021.4.11.23
Khoshnood, A., & Kafipour, R. (2023). The effect of mother tongue translation on Iranian extroverted and introverted EFL learners’ vocabulary learning. Education Research International, 2023(1). https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/2255400
Kida, S. (2022). Secondary task type, exposure frequency, and their combined effects on second language vocabulary learning through reading. Second Language Research, 38(2), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0267658320931919
Krashen, S. (1989). We acquire vocabulary and spelling by reading: Additional evidence for the input hypothesis. The modern language journal, 73(4), 440-464. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1989.tb05325.x
Laufer, B., & Girsai, N. (2008). Form-focused instruction in second language vocabulary learning: A case for contrastive analysis and translation. Applied Linguistics, 29(4), 694–716. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amn018
Morata, M., & Coyle, Y. (2012). Teaching English through Spanish: A secondary school EFL teachers' language choices in the foreign language classroom. Porta Linguarum, 18, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.30827/Digibug.31968
Nation, I. S. (2022). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009093873
Neary-Sundquist, C. A. (2015). Aspects of vocabulary knowledge in German textbooks. Foreign Language Annals, 48(1), 68–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/flan.12126
Othman, A. S. (2024). Involvement load hypothesis: A new trend in EFL contexts. Journal of the Faculty of Education, Ismailia, 59(1), 182–199. https://doi.org/10.21608/jfes.2024.357366
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology/Revue canadienne de psychologie, 45(3), 255-287. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0084295
Phan, H. D. L. (2022). The effects of translation as a pedagogical tool in teaching non-English majored students. VNU Journal of Science: Education Research, 38(4). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1159/vnuer.4617
Qu, C. (2023). The correlated influence of semantic types, L1 translation equivalents and language proficiency on EFL learners’ production of polysemous words. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1162008
Rakab, M. B. (2021). The use of L1 metalanguage in L2 classrooms: The case for Arabic. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(7), 60–69. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.7.5
Rice, C. A., & Tokowicz, N. (2020). A review of laboratory studies of adult second language vocabulary training. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(2), 439-470. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263119000500
Rivera Pérez, J. F., Creaghead, N. A., Washington, K., Guo, Y., Raisor-Becker, L., & Combs, S. (2019). Using audio prompting to assist monolingual speech-language pathologists to teach English–Spanish vocabulary to English learners. Communication Disorders Quarterly, 41(1), 3-11. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525740118819659
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Vocabulary (pp. 143-171). Routledge.
Shi, M. (2024). A study of L2 incidental vocabulary acquisition through different translation tasks. In MATEC Web of Conferences (Vol. 395, p. 01045). EDP Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/202439501045
Somjai, S., & Soontornwipast, K. (2020). The integration of implicit and explicit vocabulary instruction, project-based learning, multimedia, and experiential learning to improve Thai EFL senior high school students’ vocabulary ability. Arab World English Journal (AWEJ) Special Issue on CALL, 6, 171–190. https://doi.org/10.24093/awej/call6.12
Tian, L., & Hennebry, M. (2016). Chinese learners’ perceptions towards teachers’ language use in lexical explanations: A comparison between Chinese-only and English-only instructions. System, 63, 77–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.08.005
Tormo, C. U., Deconinck, J., & Stengers, H. (2021). Assessing pedagogical approaches to foster the comprehension and retention of new L2 Spanish idioms. ELUA: Estudios de Lingüística, Universidad De Alicante, 35(35), 309–324. https://doi.org/10.14198/ELUA2021.35.15
Tran, D. K. (2024). Revisiting the utilization of mother tongue in L2 classroom: Implications for EAP classroom. EIKI Journal of Effective Teaching Methods, 2(1), 18-26. https://doi.org/10.59652/jetm.v2i1.98
Tran, T. T. L. (2024). Language choice in EFL classrooms: A case study on students' perspective. International Journal of Language and Education Research, 6(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.29329/ijler.2024.661.3
Wang, A., & Pellicer-Sánchez, A. (2022). Incidental vocabulary learning from bilingual subtitled viewing: An eye-tracking study. Language Learning, 72(3), 765–805. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12495
Yıldız, M. (2023). An investigation into EFL learners’ ability to guess grammatical class and meaning of unfamiliar words from contextual clues. International Journal of Language Academy, 11(Special Issue), 463–475. https://doi.org/10.29228/ijla.72367
Yu, J., & Liu, X. (2022). Text first or picture first? Evaluating two modes of multimodal input for EFL vocabulary meaning acquisition. SAGE Open, 12(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221119469
Zhang, C., Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2023). Effectiveness of multimedia condition on learning second-language vocabulary: A meta-analysis [Preprint]. OSF Preprints. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yge9n
Downloads
Publicado
Edição
Secção
Licença
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
