NEGATIVE FEELINGS OF TURKISH STUDENTS IN EFL LEARNING PROCESS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v0i0.2029Cuvinte cheie:
foreign language learning, affective domain, sources of negative feelingsRezumat
The students might have either negative or positive feelings for different components of foreign language process. While positive feelings and emotions support the language acquisition process and push the students to learn the language, negative feelings block the process as they cause the learner to erect barriers to learning a foreign language. In case this process is directed by a teacher who is aware of the barriers of the students and sensitive to them, it is possible to replace negative feelings with the positive ones. The purpose of the current study is to reveal the sources of the negative feelings which hinder EFL learning process of the students in English language preparatory program in Eskişehir Osmangazi University Foreign Languages Department. Case study research design was used in order to examine the phenomenon of underlying reasons of negative feelings students associate with language learning process. Self-reports of the participants constituted the data source of the study. The data of the study was gathered through the interviews conducted with 31 students and 20 English instructors and the data gathered was analyzed inductively. The findings revealed four categories that represent the sources of students’ negative feelings: teacher-oriented negative feelings, classroom oriented negative feelings, and system oriented negative feelings and student-oriented negative feelings. The results imply a need for instructional design studies targeting to incorporate affective domain variables into teacher education programs and in-service training programs. Also, suggestions for future research are presented.
Article visualizations:
Referințe
Anderson, L. W., & Bourke, S. F. 2000. Assessing affective characteristics in the schools. Routledge.
Badri, A., Badri, A., & Badri, G. 2015. The effects of peripheral teaching on Iranian EFL vocabulary improvement. International Journal of Educational Investigation, 2(1), 10-18.
Buissink-Smith, N., Mann, S., & Shephard, K. 2011. How do we measure affective learning in higher education? Journal of Education for Sustainable Development, 5(1), 101-114.
Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. 1994. Motivation, self‐confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language learning, 44(3), 417-448.
Cohen, Y., &Norst, M. J. 1989. Fear, dependence and loss of self-esteem: Affective barriers in second language learning among adults. RELC Journal, 20(2), 61-77.
Creswell, J. W. 2014. Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Dörnyei, Z. 2001. Motivational Strategies in Language Classroom. Cambridge University Press. UK. Ss.28.
Dörnyei, Z. 2014. Researching complex dynamic systems: Retrodictive qualitative modelling’in the language classroom. Language Teaching, 47(1), 80-91.
Dörnyei, Z., & Malderez, A. 1997. Group dynamics and foreign language teaching. System, 25(1), 65-81.
Dörnyei, Z. and Skehan, P. 2008. Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition (eds C. J. Doughty and M. H. Long).
English First, 2017. English Proficiency Index. http://www.ef.com.tr/epi/. Accessed 15 September 2018
Evans, C. R., & Dion, K. L. 1991. Group cohesion and performance: A meta-analysis. Small group research, 22(2), 175-186.
Gillies, H. 2014. Researching complex dynamic systems: Retrodictive qualitative modelling in the Japanese EFL classroom (Doctoral dissertation, Ph. D. dissertation, University of Nottingham).
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. 1986. Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern language journal, 70(2), 125-132.
Krashen, S. 1982. Principles and practice in second language acquisition. ISO 690
Lozanov, G. 1978. Suggestology and suggetopedy. http://www.lozanov.org/index.php?option=com_content. Accessed 10 October 2018.
McCoach, D. B., Gable, R. K., & Madura, J. P. 2013. Instrument development in the affective domain. New York, NY: Springer.
McHugh, R. M., Horner, C. G., Colditz, J. B., & Wallace, T. L. 2013. Bridges and barriers: Adolescent perceptions of student–teacher relationships. Urban Education, 48(1), 9-43.
Mercer, S. 2008. Learner self-beliefs. ELT journal, 62(2), 182-183.
Mertens, D. M. 2014. Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.
Ozer, E. J., Wolf, J. P., & Kong, C. 2008. Sources of perceived school connection among ethnically-diverse urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Research, 23(4), 438- 470.
Rokni, S. J. A. 2014. Does peripheral learning improve EFL learners’ spelling? International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(2), 62-67.
Tepav Project Team 2013. Turkey National Needs Assessment of State School Language Teaching of Report. Ankara: Mattek Matbaa.
Thomas, D. R. 2006. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American journal of evaluation, 27(2), 237-246.
Williams, M., & Burden, R. 1999. Students' developing conceptions of themselves as language learners. The Modern Language Journal, 83(2), 193-201.
Wimberly, G. L. 2002. School Relationships Foster Success for African American Students. ACT Policy Report.
Descărcări
Publicat
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
