LINGUISTIC ERROR PATTERNS IN IELTS ACADEMIC WRITING: A CASE STUDY OF VIETNAMESE EFL LEARNERS AT THE B2 LEVEL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v10i2.6808Cuvinte cheie:
error analysis, IELTS Academic Writing, Vietnamese EFL learners, case study, writing errors, task complexityRezumat
This case study investigates linguistic error profiles and discourse-level performance of 20 Vietnamese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners (level B2/CEFR; target band 6.5+) in IELTS Academic Writing Tasks 1 and 2. Guided by Error Analysis (EA) and the official IELTS Writing Assessment Criteria, a descriptive mixed-methods design was employed to categorise errors at the word level (mechanical, morphological, lexical, and grammatical) and sentence level (syntactic, agreement, omission, and addition), complemented by qualitative discourse analysis. The findings reveal a task-contingent shift in the distribution of errors: Task 1 was associated primarily with word-level difficulties (81%), whereas Task 2 generated a substantially higher proportion of sentence-level errors (44%), particularly in modal verb complementation, passive structures, and subject-verb agreement. Discourse-level analysis further revealed a reliance on prefabricated cohesive patterns in Task 2, which constrained performance at the band 6-7 threshold. These findings suggest that the plateau many Vietnamese IELTS candidates experience is not simply a vocabulary or grammar problem but reflects a processing gap: learners lack the capacity to sustain grammatical control under the cognitive demands of extended argumentation. Task-specific instructional directions for learners targeting band 7 are discussed.Referințe
Arefsadr, S., & Babaii, E. (2023). Let their voices be heard: IELTS candidates’ problems with the IELTS Academic Writing test. Teaching English as a Second Language Electronic Journal (TESL-EJ), 26(4). https://doi.org/10.55593/ej.26104a3
Bock, K., & Miller, C. A. (1991). Broken agreement. Cognitive Psychology, 23(1), 45–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(91)90003-7
British Council, IDP: IELTS Australia, & Cambridge Assessment English. (2023). IELTS Writing Band Descriptors (Task 1 and Task 2, public version). Cambridge Assessment English. Retrieved from https://takeielts.britishcouncil.org/sites/default/files/ielts_writing_band_descriptors.pdf
Bui, H.-H. (2021). An analysis of written grammatical errors of Vietnamese learners of English. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 9(1), 66–74. Retrieved from https://www.questjournals.org/jrhss/papers/vol9-issue1/Ser-3/J0901036674.pdf
Bui, H. P. (2022). Vietnamese EFL students’ use and misconceptions of cohesive devices in writing. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440221126993
Celce-Murcia, M., & Larsen-Freeman, D. (1999). The grammar book: An ESL/EFL teacher’s course (2nd ed.). Heinle & Heinle. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Grammar_Book.html?id=5hAbAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
Corder, S. P. (1967). The significance of learners’ errors. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 5(1–4), 161–170. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1967.5.1-4.161
Crossley, S. A., Kyle, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2016). The development and use of cohesive devices in L2 writing and their relations to judgments of essay quality. Journal of Second Language Writing, 32, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.003
Ellis, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Study_of_Second_Language_Acquisition.html?hl=id&id=sKR7AQAACAAJ&redir_esc=y
Ferris, D. R. (2002). Treatment of error in second language student writing. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Treatment_of_Error_in_Second_Language_St.html?id=ml15AAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2014). Teaching L2 composition: Purpose, process, and practice (3rd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203813003
Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836010
Hyland, K., & Hamp-Lyons, L. (2002). EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 1(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1475-1585(02)00002-4
James, C. (1998). Errors in language learning and use: Exploring error analysis. Longman. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Errors_in_Language_Learning_and_Use.html?id=DLBoAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures: Applied linguistics for language teachers. University of Michigan Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/LINGUISTICS_ACROSS_CULTURES.html?id=oGKqKok3KtsC&redir_esc=y
Laufer, B., & Waldman, T. (2011). Verb-noun collocations in second language writing: A corpus analysis of learners’ English. Language Learning, 61(2), 647–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00621.x
Master, P. (1997). The English article system: Acquisition, function, and pedagogy. System, 25(2), 215–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(97)00010-9
O'Loughlin, K., & Wigglesworth, G. (2003). Task design in IELTS Academic Writing Task 1: The effect of quantity and manner of presentation of information on candidate writing. IELTS Research Reports, 4, 89–130. Retrieved from https://ielts.org/cdn/Research/task-design-in-ielts-academic-writing-task-1-oloughlin-et-al-2003.pdf
Richards, J. C. (Ed.). (1974). Error analysis: Perspectives on second language acquisition. Longman. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315836003
Robinson, P. (2001). Task complexity, task difficulty, and task production: Exploring interactions in a componential framework. Applied Linguistics, 22(1), 27–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/22.1.27
Selinker, L. (1972). Interlanguage. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 10(1–4), 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1515/iral.1972.10.1-4.209
Shaw, S. D., & Weir, C. J. (2007). Examining writing: Research and practice in assessing second language writing. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books?id=QVL_t2sKocoC&printsec=copyright&hl=sv&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false
Skehan, P. (1998). A cognitive approach to language learning. Oxford University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/A_Cognitive_Approach_to_Language_Learnin.html?hl=es&id=Yzdl3pW0Yf4C&redir_esc=y
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The uses of argument. Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Uses_of_Argument.html?id=8UYgegaB1S0C&redir_esc=y
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Case_Study_Research_and_Applications.html?hl=it&id=6DwmDwAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y
Descărcări
Publicat
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
