TEACHING VIETNAMESE UNDERGRADUATES’ INTRODUCTION SECTION WRITING THROUGH PROCESS GENRE APPROACH

Yazarlar

  • Kim Thanh Tuyen Department of Social Science, Can Tho University of Technology, Vietnam
  • Thach Kim Bao Thi Department of Aviation Management, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v10i3.6945

Anahtar Kelimeler:

process genre approach- product approach- introduction writing strategies

Öz

The main objective of this study is to find out whether the process genre approach is better than the product approach to teach introduction writing to university students in Vietnam. A non-equivalent control group experimental design with pretest and posttest was used to determine the effects of the research writing program on students’ introduction writing ability in terms of content, organization, language use and mechanics between the control group and experimental group. In the experiment, 65 participants (third-year students majoring in English) were placed into one experimental group (20 students) and one control group (45 students). Two groups were instructed by the same lecturer during one semester of 10 periods (theory, practice and assessment). The experimental group was required to receive the proposed research writing program based on the proposed model, whereas the control group received the existing program through the product approach. After the treatment, the results revealed a significant difference in the means of posttest scores on content, organization, language use, and mechanics use skills in the introduction section. For this reason, we can conclude that the process genre approach positively affects content, organization, language use, and mechanics use skills in the introduction section compared to the product approach.

Yazar Biyografileri

  • Kim Thanh Tuyen, Department of Social Science, Can Tho University of Technology, Vietnam

    Kim Thanh Tuyen is a Doctor of Philosophy. She is currently a lecturer in the Social Science Department at Can Tho University of Technology, Vietnam. Her research interests include Research writing, Autonomy learning, Khmer Culture, Process Genre Approach (PGA) in Writing, Speaking, Teaching, Testing and Assessment, and Curriculum Development.

  • Thach Kim Bao Thi, Department of Aviation Management, Swinburne University of Technology, Australia

    Thach Kim Bao Thi got a BA in Aviation Management at Swinburne University in Australia. Now, she is studying Master program in the Higher Education Sector in Vitoria University, Melbourne, Australia. She is helping with manuscript preparation.

Referanslar

Badger, R. & G. White (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal 54(2): 153-160. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/54.2.153

Richards, J. C. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching (2nd ed.). Cambridge, U.K. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/Approaches_and_Methods_in_Language_Teach.html?id=9mQ9l3K73BoC&redir_esc=y

Brown, J. (2001). Part Two: Research Essays and Other Writing Assignments. Voices from the Classroom: Reflections on Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 282. Retrieved from https://www.scribd.com/document/541708096/BROWN-2001-Teaching-by-Principles-an-Interactive-Approach-to-Language-Pedagogy-Longman-New-Y

Chow, T. V. F. (2007). The effects of the process-genre approach to writing instruction on the expository essays of ESL students in a Malaysian secondary school. PhD diss., Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia. Retrieved from https://erepo.usm.my/items/7ec3c548-d4cd-475e-bca8-394ab763e952

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition & Communication, 32(4), 365-387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Flowerdew, J. (2014). Introduction: Approaches to the analysis of academic discourse in English. In Academic discourse (pp. 11-28). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.4324/9781315838069-7/introduction-approaches-analysis-academic-discourse-english-john-flowerdew

Hyland, K. (2003). Genre-based pedagogies: A social response to process. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12(1), 17-29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1060-3743(02)00124-8

Hyland, K., Britain, G., Education, P., & Brown, H. D. (2010). The General Concepts of Writing a. Definition of Writing. Retrieved from https://repository.uinbanten.ac.id/1555/4/CHAPTER%20II%20b5.pdf

Kim, Y. & Kim, J. 2005. Teaching Korean University Writing Class: Balancing the Process and Genre Approach. Asian EFL Journal, 2005, 7 (2), 1-15.

Lee, S. Y. (2005). Facilitating and inhibiting factors in English as a foreign language writing performance: A model testing with structural equation modeling. Language Learning, 55(2), 335-374. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0023-8333.2005.00306.x

Lillis, T., & Turner, J. (2001). Student writing in higher education: Contemporary confusion, traditional concerns. Teaching in Higher Education, 6(1), 57-68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510020029608

Matsumoto, K. (1995). Research paper writing strategies of professional Japanese EFL writers. TESL Canada Journal, 17-27. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v13i1.658

Myles, J. (2002). Second language writing and research: The writing process and error analysis in student texts. Tesl-ej, 6(2), 1-20. Retrieved from https://www.tesl-ej.org/ej22/a1.html

Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled ESL students do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(2), 229-258. https://doi.org/10.2307/3586828

Sharma, R. (2010). A Step-by-step Guide to Students: How to Avoid Plagiarism. Journal of Education Research, 4(2), 143. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/220004502_A_step_by_step_guide_to_students_How_to_avoid_plagiarism

Krashen, S. (1992). The input hypothesis: An update. Linguistics and language pedagogy: The state of the art, 12(3), 409-431.

Taylor, I., & Taylor, M. M. (2013). The psychology of reading. Academic Press. Retrieved from https://books.google.ro/books/about/The_Psychology_of_Reading.html?id=MvBFBQAAQBAJ&redir_esc=y

Uemlianin, I. A. (2000). Engaging text: Assessing paraphrase and understanding. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 347-358. https://doi.org/10.1080/713696160

Yi, J. Y. (2009). Defining Writing Ability for Classroom Writing Assessment in High Schools. Journal of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 53-69. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ921024

İndir

Yayınlanmış

2026-08-18

Sayı

Cilt 10 Sayı 3 (2026)

Bölüm

Articles

Lisans

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

 

  1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.

 

  1. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).