EFFECTS OF EFL STUDENTS’ USE OF METACOGNITIVE STRATEGIES IN EXTENSIVE READING TASKS ON THEIR READING PERFORMANCE AND ATTITUDES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v6i3.4440Ключові слова:
reading comprehension, metacognitive strategies, extensive readingАнотація
Reading plays important role in teaching and learning a second language as in reading, information is acquired and processed before learners can reach the final goal of English learning – communication. Extensive reading is a helpful way to develop students’ reading habits. A quasi-experimental study with one group pretest-posttest design was conducted in the Vietnamese educational context to investigate the effects of students’ use of metacognitive strategies on intermediate learners’ reading performance and attitudes. The results indicated positive changes in learners’ performance and attitudes, especially in higher-order thinking ability. Thirty-two participants from the convenient sampling method attended a 10-week reading course with metacognitive strategies embedded in extensive reading tasks. The scores from tests showed an improvement in reading comprehension ability and higher-order thinking application. The data from the questionnaire and semi-structured interview contributes to the positive attitudes toward students towards reading activities. This study has discovered the significant effects on the awareness of learners and afterwards cognition thinking. Learners have achieved a higher level of cognitive reading, critical reading and positive attitudes towards reading activity.
Article visualizations:
Посилання
Aka, N. (2019). Reading Performance of Japanese High School Learners Following a One-Year Extensive Reading Program. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31(1), 1-18. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1212809
Alebel, A. (2020). The practice of teaching reading skills: Preparatory school in focus. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences and Humanities, 10(2), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.37648/ijrssh.v10i02.004
Alexander, P. (2008). Why this and why now? Introduction to the special issue on metacognition, self-regulation, and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 20(4), 369–372. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-008-9089-0
Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom's taxonomy of educational objectives. Longman
Artelt, C., & Schneider, W. (2015). Cross-country generalizability of the role of metacognitive knowledge in students’ strategy use and reading competence. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F016146811511700104
Barnes, E. M., & Stephens, S. J. (2019). Supporting mathematics vocabulary instruction through mathematics curricula. The Curriculum Journal, 30(3), 322-341. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1614470
Chang, A. C., & Renandya, W. A. (2017). Current practice of extensive reading in Asia: Teachers’ perceptions. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 17(1), 40-58. https://bit.ly/3QulBhL
Cunningham, P., Matusovich, H., Blackowski, S., McCord, R., & Carrico, C. (2018). Teaching metacognition: Helping students own and improve their learning. In Workshop presented at the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition. https://bit.ly/3Qg11BZ
Dang, T. N. Y. (2020). The potential for learning specialized vocabulary of university lectures and seminars through watching discipline‐related tv programs: insights from medical corpora. Tesol Quarterly, 54(2), 436-459. https://doi.org/10.1002/tesq.552
De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of educational psychology, 104(4), 1006. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1701514
DePasque, S., & Tricomi, E. (2015). Effects of intrinsic motivation on feedback processing during learning. NeuroImage, 119, 175-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.06.046
Douglas, H. (2010). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. Longman.
Eckerth, J., & Tavakoli, P. (2012). The effects of word exposure frequency and elaboration of word processing on incidental L2 vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Teaching Research, 16(2), 227-252. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168811431377
Evans, M. D., Kelley, J., & Sikora, J. (2014). Scholarly culture and academic performance in 42 nations. Social Forces, 92(4), 1573-1605. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/sou030
Floris, F. D., & Divina, M. (2015). A study on the reading skills of EFL university students. Teflin Journal, 20(1), 37-47. https://bit.ly/3SAvPyX
Ghaith, G. M., & El-Sanyoura, H. (2019). Reading comprehension: The mediating role of metacognitive strategies. Reading in a Foreign Language, 31, 19–43. https://nflrc.hawaii.edu/rfl/April2019/April2019/articles/ghaith.pdf
Grabe, W. P., & Stoller, F. L. (2013). Teaching and researching: Reading. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315833743
Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282-313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
Gutierrez, A. P., & Schraw, G. (2015). Effects of strategy training and incentives on students’ performance, confidence, and calibration. The Journal of Experimental Education, 83(3), 386-404. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.2014.907230
Hebbecker, K., Förster, N., & Souvignier, E. (2019). Reciprocal effects between reading achievement and intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(5), 419-436. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2019.1598413
Kasper, M., Uibu, K., & Mikk, J. (2018). Language teaching strategies’ impact on third-grade students’ reading outcomes and reading interest. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 10(5), 601-610. https://www.iejee.com/index.php/IEJEE/article/view/509
Lee, J., Schallert, D. L., & Kim, E. (2015). Effects of extensive reading and translation activities on grammar knowledge and attitudes for EFL adolescents. System, 52, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2015.04.016
Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596-632. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0002831209355469
Loh, C. E., & Sun, B. (2019). “I'd Still Prefer to Read the Hard Copy”: Adolescents’ Print and Digital Reading Habits. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 62(6), 663-672. https://doi.org/10.1002/jaal.904
Mathewson, G. C. (1994). Model of Attitude Influence upon Reading and Learning to Read. In R. B. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (3rd ed., pp. 1131-1161). Newark, DE: International Reading Association. https://www.literacyworldwide.org/docs/default-source/bonus-materials/front-matter-710.pdf
McLean, S., & Rouault, G. (2017). The effectiveness and efficiency of extensive reading at developing reading rates. System, 70, 92-106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2017.09.003
McQuillan, J. (2019). Where do we get our academic vocabulary? Comparing the efficiency of direct instruction and free voluntary reading. The Reading Matrix: An International Online Journal, 19(1), 129-138. https://bit.ly/3BZTfYu
Nation, I. S. P., & Waring, R. (2019). Teaching extensive reading in another language. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780367809256
OECD (2022). Reading performance (PISA) (indicator). doi: 10.1787/79913c69-en (Accessed on 11 August 2022)
Park, J., Stoel, L., & Lennon, S. J. (2008). Cognitive, affective and conative responses to visual simulation: The effects of rotation in online product presentation. Journal of Consumer Behaviour: An International Research Review, 7(1), 72-87. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.237
Reedy, A., & De Carvalho, R. (2021). Children’s perspectives on reading, agency and their environment: what can we learn about reading for pleasure from an East London primary school?. Education 3-13, 49(2), 134-147. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2019.1701514
Sikora, J., Evans, M. D., & Kelley, J. (2019). Scholarly culture: How books in adolescence enhance adult literacy, numeracy and technology skills in 31 societies. Social science research, 77, 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2018.10.003
Suk, N. (2017). The effects of extensive reading on reading comprehension, reading rate, and vocabulary acquisition. Reading Research Quarterly, 52, 73e89.
https://doi.org/10.1002/rrq.152
Tanaka, M. (2017). Factors affecting motivation for short in-class extensive reading. Journal of Asia TEFL, 14(1), 98. https://bit.ly/3A9Ai4C
Toste, J. R., Didion, L., Peng, P., Filderman, M. J., & McClelland, A. M. (2020). A meta-analytic review of the relations between motivation and reading achievement for K–12 students. Review of Educational Research, 90(3), 420-456. https://doi.org/10.3102%2F0034654320919352
Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: A conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197-1218. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9
Weir, C., and H. Khalifa. “[PDF] a Cognitive Processing Approach towards Defining Reading Comprehension: Semantic Scholar.” Undefined, 1 Jan. 1970, https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-cognitive-processing-approach-towards-defining-Weir-Khalifa/1f16c4434bcecceaf4081b478ef0334f5362dc93.
Yang, X. (2016). Study on factors affecting learning strategies in reading comprehension. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7(3), 586. https://bit.ly/3vOdjJu
Zare, M. (2018). Contributory role of critical thinking in enhancing reading comprehension ability of Iranian ESP students. International Journal of Research in English Education, 3(3), 21-28. http://dx.doi.org/10.29252/ijree.3.3.21
Завантаження
Опубліковано
Номер
Розділ
Ліцензія
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
